Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Antonin Scalia: Al Gore to blame for 2000 US election mess

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
halliburtonsux Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:02 AM
Original message
Justice Antonin Scalia: Al Gore to blame for 2000 US election mess
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 03:27 AM by halliburtonsux
Justice Antonin Scalia: Al Gore to blame for 2000 US election mess 27 Jun 2008 The 2000 presidential election debacle was the fault of Al Gore, who should have followed Richard Nixon's 1960 example and conceded without legal action, according to the Supreme Court's leading conservative 'judge.' The 2000 election (coup d'etat), in which Mr Bush eventually prevailed in pivotal Florida by just 537 votes (was selected), remains a potent source of discontent for Democrats. Last month, Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, said that the election had been stolen by "five intellectually bankrupt judges".
<snip>

:grr:

Found at Citizens For Legitimate Government. Here is a comment posted by the editor on that website:

In the *first* place, someone should tell this sociopath that the case is actually Bush v. Gore - *Bush* filed the legal action. Eight days earlier, the United States Supreme Court had decided the case of Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board. Again, the legal action was instigated by *Bush.* Moreover, George W. Bush had a fleet of lawyers poised to overturn the 2000 election if Al Gore had won the electoral vote but lost the popular vote - a fact the mainstream media whores buried. In the second place, the only fault of Gore was that he didn't call for the second American Revolution to overthrow the occupiers after the *first* coup d'etat. If Bush was prevented from stealing the presidency in 2000, the 9/11 attacks, Iraq invasion, countless war crimes and millions of environmental acts of terror would never have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. This guy does not belong on the Supreme Court.
Fucking partisan asshole. Certainly NOT a legal scholar, judging by his decisions. But then neither are Alito, Roberts or Thomas (especially him).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's a lunatic....this scalia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Jeebus Christ, just when I think he can't get any crazier,
he proves me wrong.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. He's not crazy. Don't allow him that excuse.
He was perfectly sane when he betrayed his country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Point taken.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 03:30 AM by SeattleGirl
But I didn't mean legally or psychotically crazy; I meant "doesn't give a shit about most of us" crazy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. In his gated community, that's called "normal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Howard Dean is a sharp cookie.
Antonin Scalia is a treasonous POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halliburtonsux Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yup, why couldn't Cheney have spent more time hunting w. Scalia?
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 03:33 AM by halliburtonsux
Hope springs eternal. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Okay, you've touched on a favorite fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Does anyone else think that Scalia is going insane?
I mean, the guy's always been a crank, but he's starting to embarrass himself.

Alzheimers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Going?
I think he is there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Seriously, he's been an asshole for years. But this is getting scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. What needs to happen to impeach that nutcase?
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 04:10 AM by Cronus Protagonist
There must be a way.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Doubt it.
Sex with an intern is the only impeachable offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. To quote Mandy Rice-Davies: "Well, he would, wouldn't he?"
NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Obviously this man should be removed from the bench immediately.
He has no concept of what the *FACTS* are, which means he's unfit to make decisions.

Blame it on Gore...yet Bush was the one who filed the law suits first.

Not only is this type of comment inappropriate coming from a Supreme Court Justice, it shows he's partisan in his decisions, which makes him unfit to remain on the bench.

All this of course ignoring the fact that the Supreme Court had no business sticking its nose in what was a state issue in the first place.

Scalia is a great example of why the United States is so f*cked up right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Fat Tony is nothing if not proud. He's embarrassing himself now, and there's something wrong.
Not that I care, but this seems to be more than just general assholery. The Scalia of 10 years ago would know enough to keep his mouth shut about his more insane ideas.

Hopefully, this is something fatal that really kicks in after January 2009. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halliburtonsux Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
26.  'this man should be removed from the bench immediately' --And then,
tried for treason, along with Bush bin Laden and Cheney Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. How DARE Gore win and actually expect to take office..
:grr:

Scalia is an ASS!!

It always pisses me off when people like George Carlin die, and Scalia lives on..and on..and on..

Evil people seem to live a very long life.. no wonder the saying is.."only the good die young":cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not a very impartial, even-handed jurist, is he
He should confine his assessment to the facts before him, not assign blame to either side for exercising their rights to seek legal recourse. It's evident that his mind was made up before he ever heard the case, and that it was based upon political concerns, not the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is total bullshit.
Bush stole the 2000 election and we all know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halliburtonsux Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yup, and Bush stole 2004, as well.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Everyone outside the US, most here have no idea at all.
We have become a disgrace...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halliburtonsux Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. In Mexico, people revolted against their stolen election. But, in the
US, we sign useless petitions and pray that Democrats will put Bush-Cheney impeachment on the table.
It's a farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. He almost make me feel ashamed to be born in Trenton, NJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. This isn't new
Scalia said it on "60 Minutes" two months ago:



Moreover, he says it was not the court that made this a judicial question.

"It was Al Gore who made it a judicial question. It was he who brought it into the Florida courts. We didn't go looking for trouble. It was he who said, 'I want this to be decided by the courts.' What are we supposed to say? 'Oh, not important enough,'" Scalia jokes.

"It ended up being a political decision" Stahl points out.

"Well you say that. I don't say that," Scalia replies.

"You don’t think it handed the election to George Bush?" Stahl asks.

"Well how does that make it a political decision?" Scalia asks.

"It decided the election," Stahl says.

"If that’s all you mean by it, yes," Scalia says.




http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/24/60minutes/main4040290_page4.shtml



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC