Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court, long quiet, ends term with a growl

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:11 AM
Original message
Supreme Court, long quiet, ends term with a growl
WASHINGTON — For most of the term, Supreme Court justices showed remarkable restraint. They displayed broad agreement even in some volatile areas and refrained from angry dissents.

Then they decided the tough cases.

The court, in its three most important cases, declared a constitutional right to have guns at home for self-defense, granted some constitutional protections to foreign prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and outlawed the death penalty for people who rape children.

Not only did the familiar ideological divisions return in these cases and several others, but the justices took turns hurling charges of "judicial activism" and worse at each other.

Giving rights to the detainees "will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed," Justice Antonin Scalia said in a scathing dissent he read from the bench.

No one threw that line back at Scalia in the guns case. But Justice John Paul Stevens, also summarizing his dissent in court, said of Scalia's majority opinion on gun rights that "adherence to a policy of judicial restraint by this court is far wiser than the bold decision it announced today."

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20080628/Scotus.Unrestrained.Finish/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Which one can we push out? I would love to see scalia and thomas harrassed out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. scalia would be my first choice.
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 11:49 AM by unapatriciated
unfortunately both he (72) and thomas(60) are not the oldest on the court. We need this election just to keep what little balance we have.

edited to correct ages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Super Soaker Sniper Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Really think that would happen?
To what end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We couldn't do worse than Scalia or Thomas if we selected
names out of the phone book at random.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. To be honest (and to go against my self-interest as a progressive/liberal)
I favor a 4-4, conservative-liberal split with a moderate ninth justice. This seems to be what we have, even if the identity of the relative members is not always the same for every case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC