Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NRA lays its cards on the table... Morton Grove folds.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:06 AM
Original message
NRA lays its cards on the table... Morton Grove folds.
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 12:24 AM by D__S
Wise, prudent and proper move.

Now if only the other communities would follow suit...



NRA Eyes More Targets After D.C. Gun-Ban Win

by Libby Lewis

Weekend Edition Sunday, June 29, 2008 · Five cities and suburbs are facing lawsuits challenging their bans on handguns. When the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark June 26 decision, rejecting Washington, D.C.'s ban on handguns, gun-rights lawyers swung into action.

As a result, the legal landscape for gun laws could face dramatic changes.

The village of Morton Grove, Ill., just north of Chicago, has one of the oldest handgun bans in the nation on its books. It's also the target of one of the five lawsuits filed by the National Rifle Association.

Village Manager Joe Wade says Morton Grove isn't going to wait for a court battle. It's going to act.

"The village of Morton Grove has every intention to comply with the Supreme Court ruling," Wade says. "We're going to propose an ordinance that would eliminate the possession-of-handgun ban within the village."


:smoke:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92008363

(edit... fix link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I want you on my team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm all in!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. OUTSTANDING!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, D_S..
You seen "klashnikitty's" new freind yet??



(from a post Beevul made earlier today)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. there's an i.r.s field office in morton grove...
they might want to rethink that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Law Was Never Really Enforced
I grew up near Morton Grove and was in the area when this ban came down. I knew several people in the town who had guns prior to the ban and kept them in their homes afterwards. It was a don't ask, don't tell policy. As long as a gun owner kept the guns outta sight the local police would not make a stink about it. The ones who benefitted from the "ban" were the politicians and realtors...the prices of homes in the area went up in the years ahead in some part due to that ban and the yuppie families it brought to the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. A law that is never really enforced
does not belong on the books. Who gets to make the decision whether to enforce a law or not. It could be to silence/embarras a political opponents, deter racially undesirables from relocating to the other side of the tracks,or against a citizen that a cop has it in for. If it is not evenly applied on a regular basis, it should be removed from the books. JMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. I look forward to a similar post about Daley and Chicago.


Oh happy day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I really enjoyed watching Richie's face turn red as he went into
another one of his tirades! Anything that raises Daley's blood pressure seems to lower mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. CONTRIBUTE TO THE BRADY CAMPAIGN TO FIGHT THESE LAWSUITS HERE:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I s'pose that's a good idea, if you like pissing away your money.
I'm sure the Brady's (who are Republicans, as you are well aware) would appreciate your hard-earned cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And I'm sure you're well aware that the Brady Campaign is non-partisan WHILE THE NRA...
Openly tilts towards the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Please see re #12, below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Repeating a cynical half-truth doesn't make it true...
Jim and Sarah Brady are Republicans.

The Brady Campaign is a non-partisan organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. Former Indiana mayor, republican paul helmke...
Former Indiana republican mayor paul helmke...just a coincidence jim and sara picked him to be president of the brady group, nothing to see here folks :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. "Openly tilts towards the Republican Party"
And just WHY do you supposes that is? It couldn't be the fact that DEMOCRATIC pols in the northeast, great lakes and west coast have been behind almost all of the gun control in the last few decades, could it? The NRA-ILA is a single issue organization, they support those who support the RKBA. If you don't, then no matter what party you belong to, they will oppose you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Heston moved the NRA from the "pretense of neutrality"...
...

Heston campaigned tirelessly for President Bush during the most tightly fought election in U.S. history. Targeting three key swing-states, the NRA consistently drew crowds of over 8,000 cheering supporters to hear Heston speak. Sometimes the Heston rally out-drew a Gore rally when the two appeared simultaneously.

Frustrated that the NRA was "misleading" the public, the Gore campaign called LaPierre and pleaded with him to tell Heston that Gore does not want to take away people's guns.

Heston did exactly as instructed, telling the crowd that Gore had called to remind everyone he is not against guns. The crowd roared with laughter.

The 2000 presidential election was also significant for the NRA because it marked the first national election in which the NRA finally dispensed with any pretense of neutrality between the Democrats and the Republicans. Previously, the NRA had backed candidates from either party who had a strong progun record. This time the NRA opened its coffers primarily to the Republican Party.

...


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BTT/is_153_25/ai_75211999

And this is an American Handgunner article....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Three words
Assault Weapons Ban.

Gore supported the Schumer-Feinstein-Metzenbaum-Clinton (hint, hint, ALL Democrats) AWB, that is trying to take people's guns away, period. He had chances to denounce it, but did he, no? Gore (and Clinton) made the same foolish mistake many other pols have made. They equated gun ownership only with hunting. They like many other advocates of gun control have long misrepresented that gun ownership is only about hunting, which it isn't. And they have always claimed they aren't trying to take hunters guns away. But, there are 80,000,000 gun owners in the US and only 15,000,000 registered hunters. In other words 4 out of 5 of Americans do not hunt. The Second Amendment is not about hunting, or target shooting or gun collecting. It's about self-defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. So you're telling me WHY the NRA is Republican. Good to see some honesty....
The NRA wants Assault Weapons...

Most rank-and-file Democrats don't...

Republicans jumped for the NRA money first and they got the lion's share.

Democrats then figured out the anti-gun stance of it's membership was soft, so they too went for the NRA money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Do you even know WHAT the AWB banned?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. "Most rank-and-file Democrats don't..."
What (other than projection) are you basing that on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. So let them claw at each other
I don't see how throwing money into the Litigation Wishing Well is going to trump a SCOTUS decision.

It's a done-deal. Fait accompli. This cherry's been plucked.

Before the (non-republican) gun-guys celebrate too much, though, remember: This decision isn't about guns. Not even a little bit.

This is probably the most evenly matched issue of each party's cherished platforms but it breaks down in the population to about

20% = HATE guns

20% = LOVE guns

60% = DON'T give a rat's ass.

(before some straw-clutching, pugnacious PostWarrior demands a citation, I made those figures up. it's probably more like 10-10-80, but it doesn't matter if it's 45-45-10).

I propose about the same ratio within our party, as well as the population here at DU.


HERE'S WHAT IT'S REALLY ABOUT!

This is the pre-election demonstration to the "hard right" that stuffing the Supreme Court has finally been accomplished. If they can end the controversy on this issue (which most American's don't care about, hence; no big commotion) they can prove to their gun-supporting members (the uber-right, BTW. We have gun-enthusiasts, they have gun-nuts) (OK, we have gun-nuts, too, but I like ours better) they:

$$$$$ demonstrate their ability to define the constitution in any way their constituents wish. $$$$$

They can redefine the separation of church/state. They can define marriage without losing an attempt to ratify an amendment. They can outlaw abortion. They can demand equalk time for Creation Theory/ID.

They have demonstrated the ability to hand this country over to the extreme right-wing.



This decision isn't going to change anything much about gun use. The same folks who owned guns before will own them now. Do you think that 85% of the DC population went out saturday morning to purchase guns?

The same people who carried guns before will carry them now. For you non-gunners, those cool rigs you see on TV detectives, that lump on the traffic cops hip; those chafe like a bear. Those willing to put up with it in today's society, which is *not* old-west dangerous, are the same folks who always have.

The only thing that's changed is HOPE. The religious zealots, the xenophobes, the racists, the homophobes, the misogynists; they'll all see a new ray of hope beaming from the clouds; "NOE WE WILL PWNED YOU!!1! SERIESLY!"


George W. bush is a tool, as is McCaine. Our real rulers are *not* stupid and they *do* know how to whip up a mob.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. NRA gives endorsement to (DEMOCRAT) Schweitzer
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 11:42 AM by beevul
NRA gives endorsement to Schweitzer
By CHARLES S. JOHNSON
Gazette State Bureau

HELENA - The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund on Tuesday endorsed Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer's re-election, citing his strong support of the rights of gun owners, hunters and sportsmen.

"He's just done a great job defending the Second Amendment, hunting, fishing (and) access on the part of the public to public lands," NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said in a phone interview after a press conference in Billings.

"He also had legislation that secured $10 million for public access. He ended the moratorium on the buffalo hunt after 16 years."

Schweitzer, a lifetime NRA member, received an A rating from the NRA.

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2008/05/28/news...




Seems like an organization that "Openly tilts towards the Republican Party" wouldn't be endorsing Democrats, at least to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
30. Brady campaign lawyers need new boats!! Donate TODAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spouting Horn Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The Brady's are Republican
and they have been contributing to Democratic losses since they began their "campaign."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
20.  I come here to hang with my progressive freinds...
I don't want to be bombarded with Republican fundraisers...

Take that shit over to FREEPER land, where it belongs..

This forum is for Progressives, and Democrats, NOT RETHUGS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. How very Rovian of you....
The NRA tilts openly toward Republicans...

The Brady Campaign is non-partisan...

So, the pro-NRA posters accuse the Brady Campaign of being Republican. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. It is not an accusation, if it is TRUE...
Just so you know...The NRA has contributed FAR MORE MONEY, to Democrats, than the Brady Campaign has..

Take your rolling, freeper road show, somewhere else please. This is a forum where we support the Bill of Rights....not where Republicans meet, to make strategy and raise money.

Don't make me hit the "ALERT" button....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Because the Brady Campaign is non-partisan....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. BULLSHIT...
Why is it that when Democrats, listen to them, We loose ELECTIONS??

I tell you why, Sara Brady, REPUBLICAN...Paul Helmke, REPUBLICAN, Mike Bloomberg, REPUBLICAN...

Why are we surprised, when we loose, when we are taking orders from these likes of THOSE??

Ask yourself one thing...

Why would Sara Brady, and Paul Helmke, who are Republicans, want DEMOCRATS, to take politically self-destructive positions??

Have you forgot 1994, and our massive losses? Took us 12 years to regain the congress, and the #1 reason for those losses was because too many Democrats was taking election advice from Sara Brady, who IS, a Republican.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. They probably donate more to repubs because of people like those here on the left
that want to ban guns.

I hear people on the right want to control a woman's body - but some people here on the left want to control everyone's body, from smoking to guns to seat belts to what others eat - I don't like control freaks at all, no matter what party they try to hide behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. A voice of reason...
"I don't like control freaks at all, no matter what party they try to hide behind."

The voice of the mainstream, right there.


Well said, thank you TSS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Excellent point, thank you.
I'm sick and tired of authoritarians of all stripes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
17. yep, gun nuts are everywhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
29. good ol' NRA
the country is going down the toilet (thanks in no small part to whackjob politicians they have helped elect on no other virtue than their 'gun-friendliness'), but at least the good people of Morton Grove (pop. 22451) can legally arm themselves...

FFS...if the NRA only came out against the war, bush would pull everyone out by the end of the week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-01-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
36. and in other news, our 'friends' at the NRA are shelling out $40 mil to smear Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC