Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fear & Loathing for Tim Russert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:01 AM
Original message
Fear & Loathing for Tim Russert
From the NY Magazine this weekend. http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/48333/

Fear & Loathing for Tim Russert
Lapham speaks ill.

* By Jada Yuan
* Published Jul 6, 2008

Lewis Lapham isn’t happy with political journalism today. “There was a time in America when the press and the government were on opposite sides of the field,” he said at a premiere party for Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson on June 25. “The press was supposed to speak on behalf of the people. The new tradition is that the press speaks on behalf of the government.” An example? “Tim Russert was a spokesman for power, wealth, and privilege,” Lapham said. “That’s why 1,000 people came to his memorial service. Because essentially he was a shill for the government. It didn’t matter whether it was Democratic or Republican. It was for the status quo.” What about Russert’s rep for catching pols in lies? “That was bullshit,” he said. “Thompson and Russert were two opposite poles.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wondered what Hunter would have to say
about St Tim.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm sure he could have written a book about what he thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Before or after he stopped laughing
I'm sure Hunter would have some interesting, and spot on, comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. What would Hunter say about Lapham - probably nothing, but give him
an approving smile and slap on the back.

You can use fewer words when leaders are telling the truth. Truth is expected. Lies are thieves and killers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good on Lewis Lapham! With one pithy remark, he cuts through all the bullshit
and zeroes in on what Tim Russert really represented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. The press in the 19th century were shills for the Republican Party
I don't think there were any "golden days" of a crusading press. It was a big deal for the editor of the Washington Post to skewer Nixon over Watergate, but examples of righteous journalism are few.

During Watergate, the TV networks cowed when Nixon threatened to use the FCC against them and pull their "licenses".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I have to agree with you
Newspapers have often been run by people who have helped set the agenda. They decide how to allocate resources. This means they decide which story gets covered and how much attention it will get. They decide how much to go after someone and which information isn't fit to print and what is. That's why the press is so important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Our idea of crusading newspapers
bent on the public good, probably goes back to the muckrakers of the late 19TH and early 20TH century. Independent magazines and papers set out to expose public and private corruption and right social wrongs. TR is alleged to have coined the term Muckraker. There's a good Wikipedia entry on the subject. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muckraker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Right on.
Didn't Russert even say that he valued access above all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cheney's camp thought Russert's show was "our best format"
for Cheney to spew his crap without actually being called on it in any real way, i.e. they knew Russert would be lobbing softballs.

That's speaks volumes about Russert.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC