KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-08-08 07:15 AM
Original message |
C-SPIN: Mike Allen - Stenographer Extraordinaire |
|
Sheesh, this POS was just gushing after watching a Gramps soundbite...saying how this was showing the "navy man" in him.
This dude has been one of this regime's biggest enablers and continues to carry the water.
Discuss...
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-08-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. He's a 100% GOP asset. I'll bet they have his ass branded "GOP Property." |
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-08-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message |
2. He's a narcissistic ass.... |
|
One of the worst, yet the MSM gushes over him at POlitico because he used to wrote for WAPO... One of the worst...
|
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-08-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. That's Why They Call It "The Village" |
|
This tool has worked his way up on the backs of stabbing Democrats and playing PR agent for all things Repugnican. Listening to him attempt to play up Gramps and knock down Obama shows just how over the edge this goon has gone.
He's on Joe Allibritton's payroll...no friend of Democrats.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-08-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He's salivating over McSame.
|
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-08-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. He's Not Even Hiding It |
|
It's like he's a spokesperson for the damn campaign. Count how many times he attempt to say "this is what he really meant"...as though he's channelling Gramps.
And there he is astroturfing how Obama will "raise taxes"...BULLSHIT. Those tax breaks to the rich will SUNSET in 2010...Obama has no control on that and wasn't even in the Senate to vote on them in the first place. Thus the framing that if he doesn't make them "permanent" then it's obviously a "tax hike"
:hi:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:50 PM
Response to Original message |