Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEC. 103. SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS OF CERTAIN COURT ORDERS UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:18 PM
Original message
SEC. 103. SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS OF CERTAIN COURT ORDERS UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE
(a) Inclusion of Certain Orders in Semiannual Reports of Attorney General- Subsection (a)(5) of section 601 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1871) is amended by striking `(not including orders)' and inserting `, orders,'.

(b) Reports by Attorney General on Certain Other Orders- Such section 601 is further amended by adding at the end the following:

`(c) Submissions to Congress- The Attorney General shall submit to the committees of Congress referred to in subsection (a)--

`(1) a copy of any decision, order, or opinion issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review that includes significant construction or interpretation of any provision of this Act, and any pleadings, applications, or memoranda of law associated with such decision, order, or opinion, not later than 45 days after such decision, order, or opinion is issued; and

`(2) a copy of each such decision, order, or opinion, and any pleadings, applications, or memoranda of law associated with such decision, order, or opinion, that was issued during the 5-year period ending on the date of the enactment of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 and not previously submitted in a report under subsection (a).

`(d) Protection of National Security- The Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, may authorize redactions of materials described in subsection (c) that are provided to the committees of Congress referred to in subsection (a), if such redactions are necessary to protect the national security of the United States and are limited to sensitive sources and methods information or the identities of targets.'.

(c) Definitions- Such section 601, as amended by subsections (a) and (b), is further amended by adding at the end the following:

`(e) Definitions- In this section:

`(1) FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT- The term `Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court' means the court established under section 103(a).

`(2) FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW- The term `Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review' means the court established under section 103(b).'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. golly gosh, and we believe the administration will obey these reporting requirements because..?
:eyes:

they have *such* a good track record of honesty and openess....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. it looks pretty clearly like the AG by law must submit any FISA request to Congress
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 05:27 PM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No.
Key words: "significant construction or interpretation of any provision of this Act". In the following section, "such" refers back to, well, any decision/order/etc. containing a "significant construction or interpretation of any provision of this Act".

It's Congress saying that it was caught with its pants down last time and they didn't like their collective ass hanging out in the breeze. Any new interpretation has to go to Congress; then they can change the law, or at least know how the law's being understood by the FIS court.

Most warrants and most of the FISA activity will not include "significant construction or interpretation". Trivial construction/interpretation, or mere approval of warrants and other requests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if Congress will send them a strongly worded letter if they
don't turn over the information.






A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.
- Edward R. Murrow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It will be... vociferous! With much finger-wagging!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Protection of National Security"
Why do I see a stack of black paper being delivered to the Intelligence and Judiciary committies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Because what they're interested in isn't likely to be excised.
They want to know how the FIS court rules on interpretation and understanding of the law. Most of that will be in relation to a specific instance, but the instance itself is often just fodder (from this perspective) for hanging a construction or interpretation on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Only one rec? Shame on you DUers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC