Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could telecom immunity lead to charges against this administration?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:29 PM
Original message
Could telecom immunity lead to charges against this administration?
:shrug:

Now, those companies can't be held accountable for what the administration demanded they do (for national security reasons, of course). So, NOW, only the Bushite/Neocon actors must take the heat.

Right?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Senator Leahy, just a few minutes ago on Air America,
doesn't think that will be possible with a new provision that was added to this "compromise". A get out of jail free card, he said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That card is for the telecoms, not the administration,...right?
Every member of the administration who authorized unconstitutional invasions ARE STILL SUBJECT to the laws of this land.

Correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No -- for the administration.
He said that people who said "it's okay to break the law" would get off scott free.

When the host (in for Rachel on AA) said that John Dean felt there would be some wiggle room through which to indict, Leahy felt it would be very difficult to do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Okay. Fuck it. I give up.
I've invested all I have into notions of "democracy" (e.g. equality FOR ALL).

I quit, now.

Why invest in a fiction,...especially one that always leads to oppression?

I quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Don't --
because don't you believe that Obama won't be pulling any of this shit when he's in office?

Our rights and protections will begin to be restored. America and its people will become important again. We'll be learning from our mistakes and making the best future we can.

I'm furious about the vote today, but I truly believe we're in for a turn back to what we want and need (and who we are as a nation) when Obama gets in the WH.

Even though I could wring his neck right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He's certainly better than what we've had,...
,...and I know he's not in this fight for merely his own self-interests or circle.

Besides, I never demanded perfection,...just a smidgen of hope toward a more equal existence. That's all it takes,...a smidgen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I just heard (again on AA)
that both Feingold and Leahy have confidence in Obama. As the host said, they've earned our trust, so he trusts their feelings on this.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. "Our rights and protections will begin to be restored."
We're going to need to make a list...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Much easier to convict in a civil court than a criminal court.
This is really what the telecoms were afraid to face. No one will ever be convicted in a criminal court for all the laws broken and the lies that have brought us to where we are today. If believing that justice will ever be served to these people helps one get through the day, I say go for it. I see no reason to believe that but to each their own. As for Obama going after them when he is President, not going to happen. He will simply let bygones be bygones and in the interest of unity let the past be the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. But can it happen under a GOP administration? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. that'll be happening right after Fitzmas /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't buy the spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, here's a photo of Bush "taking the heat"

FUCK YOU, American people...
FUCK YOU, US Constitution...
FUCK YOU, FUCK YOU, FUCK YOU...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. telecom immunity does not change the exposure to criminal charges of administration officials
I still expect Bush to issue blanket pardons to everyone involved in all his administration's illegal activities, including pardoning Cheney and himself.

But unless Bush does so, Obama's new Justice can and should pursue criminal investigations regarding the misuse of the telecoms by Bush. I'd start with Qwest, which alone should take down many Bushies. They went after the Qwest for refusing to go along, so that cannot be affected by the telecom immunity bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I think it lessens their exposure
... no more worry about unpleasant facts coming out in civil suits

If Bush issues a blanket pardon to people involved in the warrantless wiretap they can't be touched.
Civil suits are already off the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. yeah! and maybe, just maybe,
it will make monkeys fly out of my butt when I fart too!

Won't that be cool?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC