Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Obama Will Support Filibuster Of Any Bill Containing Telecom Immunity"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:32 PM
Original message
"Obama Will Support Filibuster Of Any Bill Containing Telecom Immunity"
By Greg Sargent - October 24, 2007

t's official: Obama will back a filibuster of any Senate FISA legislation containing telecom immunity, his campaign has just told Election Central. The Obama campaign has just sent over the following statement from spokesman Bill Burton:

"To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies."

As we reported here yesterday, MoveOn and a dozen top liberal bloggers were preparing to wage an aggressive campaign today to pressure Obama and Hillary to say that they'll support Chris Dodd's vow to filibuster any Senate FISA bill containing telecom immunity. And late yesterday both Obama and Hillary put out statements saying that they'd back Dodd's threatened filibuster of the current legislation that's just come out of the Senate intel committee.

Those statements, however, lacked the clarity that immunity opponents have been looking for, so today the MoveOn and lib blogger campaign has been in full swing. MoveOn emailed members this morning urging them to call Obama and Hillary and...

Tell him/her the public is counting on him/her to filibuster any bill that gives immunity to phone companies that broke the law.

Now we have Obama's answer: He'll support a filibuster of any such bill.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/10/obama_camp_says_it_hell_support_filibuster_of_any_bill_containing_telecom_immunity.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hannity?
So, basically, you're posting this to tell everyone "Obama was against it before he was for it." Bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wow
No shame and lots of excuses from people who insisted he was to be our great hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. What's your take on the vote, jefferson dem, are we keeping our powder dry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. My take, in one word...
Prudent.

There was absolutely no reason for Obama to fall on his sword in the name of a doomed vote to filibuster FISA legislation. I'm as much of a civil libertarian as anyone on this board but I also appreciate the political realities we confront. Thankfully, so does our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Well, my take is "disappointing"
Really, I am naive enough to think that these pledges and stances mean something, and that they shouldn't be waving around like reeds in the wind in the name of political expediency.

You'll not like this link but:

http://baltimorechronicle.com/2008/070708Miller.shtml

"Obama's recent rightward moves—concerning BushCo's faith-based programs, and the FISA bill—have both been loudly justified by commentators who would certainly deplore them if it weren't Obama who had made them.

The thinking goes like this: "Obama's our guy, and he's really cool, the candidate of 'change,' so we should cut him all the slack he needs, so he can get elected president. In any case, this recent stuff is not so bad. So let's all lighten up—or else. Because he has to make such moves, or he will lose; and those who criticize him now are only helping the Republicans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Prudent?
You have got to be kidding. This is a 180 degree turn around. This not something to play politics with. This is the Constitution, something that Obama claimed to believe in. Our nominee seems to be trying to prove that he's just like all the other politicians. Every day it looks more and more like there will be no change.

I have been an avid Obama supporter but I find his sudden rush to the right, and this vote especially , to be very troubling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. Fine.
I know about the Constitution and all. Just like the outcome of the vote was pre-decided, the constitutonality of the statute will be sorted out by the courts, regardless of whatever position Obama took.

Feel troubled if you must. I don't. The sky is not falling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama had an ex-gay preacher! I will work for his downfall forever!!!
Signed,

Bluebear (one-issue voter)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm not a one-issue voter, you jagoff. Freedom and the Constitution are not 'gay'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyCamus Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. What are you talking about?
You have a problem with gays?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I had a problem with Obama using ex-gays to perform at his events.
This was last October, and as you can see, some idiots didn't like me for speaking up then and they don't like it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyCamus Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Well, we disagree on his vote, but agree on that homophobic gospel singer.
I think Obama was reaching out to the wrong sort of people with that fundraiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I certainly will vote for Obama. make no mistake.
And thank you for your views on that fundraiser :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. Seems like someone can't let go of primary infighting...
Not like Bluebear wasn't justified in her outrage. Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. Bluebear is not a one-issue voter-Bluebear is awesome.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KMC Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. What Happened, Barack?
We need to hold Obama's feet to the fire...Stick to our Democratic core values, Barack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. LOL! Blah blah blah...concern...blah blah blah.
Who do you support for President? Be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
45. troll much? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedShoes Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. we are all painfully aware that he did the wrong thing.
but since this is a new bill, his camp can use that as the reason for his change of heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Please. See threads for "I agree with FISA". We are not all aware it was wrong.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedShoes Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. I did and they are unfortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyCamus Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Not "all" - I support our nominee.
He certainly knows more about this than some bunch of webheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. Oh horseshit
Your congresscritter doesn't sit up there on Capitol Hill poring over reams of classified information that you don't have access to. In fact I bet I could name 50 DU'ers that are more informed on most bills than that lot is. Most of the time they don't even bother to read the fucking thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
40. That's the kind of thinking that got us into Iraq.
'If he's pushing for it, he must know something I don't'.

Judge them by their actions, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Im really getting tired of these threads by former strong Hillary supporters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Then put me on ignore, newbie, as I told you earlier. I voted for Edwards.
Go visit some adoration thread where your candidate can do no wrong, because I happen to think our candidates work for us, not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. too bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Too bad...
Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. BB is an Edwards supporter, and a damned good guy -- and liberal
LIVE FREE OR DIE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Thank you very many. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. *rainbow hugs and kisses*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyCamus Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. His opinion has evolved. That's what thinking does for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. devolved would be more accurate. That's what pandering does for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. Damn, I don't like snacking this late
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. You know, I didn't think about that. Just go easy on the butter. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I popped one of those Orville 100-calorie bags
Kettle corn. Or is it "Kettle Korn"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. Another post meant to bash Obama from you?? I'm shocked!!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Aw, shut up and put me on ignore already.
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 11:18 PM by Bluebear
I don't need to hear how much you dislike me every other day so please just ignore me and go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hillary said she would as well?
Wow. And neither did.

Things that make you go hmmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
38. Please take a few minutes to read these threads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
39. Yeah, it's too bad the filibuster wouldn't have had enough votes to sustain it
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. There's not ONE democratic Senator
that Obama could sway? I've been told he's now the leader of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Welcome back.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. it would have - if the democratic leadership believed in it & enforced
party discipline, ala sam rayburn & lbj.

but neither is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC