Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can you sue God's publishers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:32 PM
Original message
Can you sue God's publishers?
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/religion_theseeker/2008/07/can-you-sue-the.html

If you can't sue the Lord for libel, what are your options? A Michigan man is about to find out. Bradley LaShawn Fowler, 39, has filed lawsuits in a Michigan federal court against Zondervan Publishing and Thomas Nelson Publishing, claiming some editions of the Bibles those companies put out call homosexuality sinful, which has led him to suffer discrimination, emotional pain and mental instability.

"Defendant willfully caused me to endure acts of hate, discrimination, and loss of sleep, appetite, by structuring their New King James Bible to reflect God’s distaste of homosexuals," Fowler wrote in his complaint against Thomas Nelson filed this week.

"By designing this product to promote hate and violence toward homosexuality, because such product is promoted as being the ‘authentic word of God,’ it is a design defect," says Fowler’s lawsuit.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. This will most likely be thrown out as a frivilous lawsuit nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Gotta love the irony: the lawsuit is frivolous; the bible is not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope not. If God is infallible, then homosexual people are part of
his great plan. I hope he wins. If he does, then God does too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who's going to represent God in court?
I thought all lawyers went to Hell? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. "some editions"? Is there some other edition?
I too hope he wins. Then sue Gideons and all major religions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The phrase homosexual
does not appear in many editions of the Bible or in Jewish scripture.

In some it says, "It's an abomination in the eyes of God for a may to lay down in bed with a man, like he would a woman."

That can be taken a variety of ways -- One such would be "Sodomy is ok with a man, but not a woman."

I have a friend who is a Rabbi and he says that in Jewish scriptures it says, "It is an abomination in the eyes of God for a man to lay in his bed with a man the way he does with his wife."

Using that quote, it can mean That having sex with a man in the same bed that you do your wife is an abomination.

So, there are many editions of the Bible that omit the word homosexual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's an interesting idea.
>>>>The suit against Zondervan claims 1982 and 1987 editions of the publisher’s Bible declare homosexuality to be wrong in 1 Corinthians 6:9:"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders."

Fowler claims the term was edited out of the 1989 and 1994 editions, but consumers were not informed.>>>>

What's not clear is whether the publisher altered a previous edition to *add* "homosexual offenders" where the "original" version left it out. In which case it's hate speech dressed up in religious garb.

But it seems the basis of the suit ( as I read the article) is that Zondervan *deleted* the term in the later editions ( perhaps evidencing conciousness of guilt? It's not clear.) and is being sued for that reason..... which doesn't make a lot of sense.

Anyway, the bible is in its essence a mishmosh of various prejudices and irrationalities and it's kind of fun as well as instructive to watch the drop-add process go on in fron of us.

Interesting and creative use of the court system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC