Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

just heard on Thom Hartmann, if Bush is being impeached he cannot pardon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:28 PM
Original message
just heard on Thom Hartmann, if Bush is being impeached he cannot pardon
people (crooks)!
I was unaware of that, but it is one more reason to DO IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, so more power to Congress to support impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does that mean if it's in process?
Because Clinton was impeached, and was reamed for his pardon of Marc Rich (which slays me, after Bush1 pardoned all the Iran-Contra traitors....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. a side note ... during the impeachment of BC, the economy was going well
and Rush Limbaugh, in an unintentional jab at Republicans, said that the Congress was doing nothing and the economy was booming ...

In other words, keeping the Republicans from doing any legislation was making for a good economy ...

Now, you have a U.S. congress which is handcuffed ... 49 Dems, 49 Repukes, and 2 "independents" (okay, Lieberman is actually a Republican now, but claimed he would caucus with the Dems) ... and the economy is going sour. Stalled "Dem-controlled" Congress, and the economy is going to hell. Bush vetoes anything that didn't have a Repuke as an original author ...

Of course, the Repukes try to say that this "Dem-controlled" Congress are causing the bad economy ... how? They can't get anything done - Repuke filibuster, Bush veto, Repuke refusing to override the veto ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. And Impeachment Hearings are immune to "executive privilege" claims.
It is the only way to stop the war criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Actually any criminal investigation is immune to executive privilege claims.
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 12:58 PM by Wizard777
It's just that Congress has not officially called their oversight a criminal investigation. The second they do. EP goes out the window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. But Nanc has not put it on the table
Doubt she ever will. Even in light of the evidence of guilt with Rove fleeing, she will keep it out of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is he being impeached?
Or is Congress merely looking into it?

And if Bush pardons someone after impeachment starts, who's going to reverse him? Nancy?

I wonder how long it will take him to pardon Rove.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, he cannot pardon anyone UNDER impeachment.
An ongoing impeachment does not change his executive powers under the constitution. However, if say, justice Roberts were being impeached for a miscarriage of justice, Bush could never pardon him.

"he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment" -Article 2 Section 2 US Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The wording seems ambiguous here...
his own impeachment or someone else's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exothermic Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's not really ambiguous: if Bush were "under" impeachment, his Executive powers are not affected.
If he should be -convicted- of articles of impeachment, they would obviously cease as he would no longer -be- the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The constitution doesn't say "under impeachment"
and that's not what I'm saying about its ambiguity. I mean that it's unclear to which party "in Cases of Impeachment" refers -- the president's impeachment or (for example) the chief justice's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exothermic Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Well, "cases of impeachment" makes it pretty clear they were not talking about the President.
If they were, they would have said so. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. If they had intended to exempt the president,
I think they would have said so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exothermic Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. No doubt. When you're nominated to the Supreme Court, I promise to support you 100%
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. If it's unspecified, couldn't it mean ANY cases of impeachment? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. I would interpret that to mean that a president could not pardon
a government official for an offense for which the official is being impeached -- not until the impeachment is completed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. that is what I thought.

God, I wish it were true though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's what I've been hollering for at least a year... trying to get through to the anti impeachment
crowd. This is why impeachment is SO important... it takes away pardon power so the asshole can't issue a blanket pardon on his way out the door...

K&R!


Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exothermic Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm 99.72% certain that's not true.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Well reading the Constitution should help then...
Article II, Section 2:
"..., and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."

Thus any pardon related to an act that was included in a successful impeachment proceeding negates the pardon.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exothermic Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Can we look at that sentence...
"Thus any pardon related to an act that was included in a successful impeachment proceeding negates the pardon."

How does a pardon negate -itself-? How much of itself can a snake swallow?

Sorry but your "thus" is way premature and illogical. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Replace the "negates the pardon" with "is rendered null."
You are correct in that I mis-spoke. I doubt the premature applies though.

Sheesh, English is my first language too. :P

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. that means he can't pardon people who have been Impeached
but he can pardon them before they are impeached and he can still pardon them criminally but just can't prevent their, or his, Impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I agree with your reading....
If Bush is impeached he can still pardon any of his gang -- he just can't reverse their impeachment (or his own).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoris Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. If both Cheney and bush are impeached and convicted, wouldn't that make Pelosi POTUS? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. That's correct. The president cannot pardon anyone from impeachment.
Impeachment has only one remedy: Upon conviction by the senate, the impeached person is removed from office.

The president can pardon criminal matters. Impeachment is a POLITICAL action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. This is the correct answer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thom Hartman just mention our DUer Dave Swanson
as one the patriots that has worked so hard on impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. This and many other reasons,
mainly that will keep BushCo from doing any more damage to this country and the Constitution while he is being impeached during the rest of his term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
29. that is not true
Now they can Impeach him for doing the pardons but his pardon power is absolute until he leaves office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. No it just means he cannot reverse an impeachment (or subsequent conviction in the Senate)
by means of a pardon.

He can still pardon them for the crimes that led to the impeachment (so that they won't be arrested, indicted and tried when they leave office).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC