Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blogger Fired After Criticizing US Attorney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 07:34 AM
Original message
Blogger Fired After Criticizing US Attorney
Edited on Sat Jul-12-08 07:35 AM by marmar
from AlterNet's PEEK:




Blogger Fired After Criticizing US Attorney

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Raw Story at 3:00 PM on July 11, 2008.

Alabama US Attorney denies any involvement in university editor's termination.



This 'case is definitely about the first amendment,' says Harper's journalist

The abrupt dismissal of a veteran University of Alabama employee who blogged about the firing of seven US Attorneys has added a bizarre new twist to allegations that the state's US Attorneys targeted political opponents for prosecution.

Roger Shuler -- a high-profile blogger and leading critic of Alabama's judicial system -- has written extensively about alleged corruption among U.S. Attorneys for over a year. In particular, Shuler focused on two US Attorneys from his home state: Alice H. Martin of the Northern District and Leura G. Canary of the Middle District.

An editor in the University of Alabama Birmingham publications office for the last 12 years and a university employee for 19, Shuler was placed on administrative leave May 7 and formally fired May 19.

(Read the rest at Raw Story.)


http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/91241/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. So long, First Amendment.
It's the one that had to do with freedom from religion, freedom of religion, speech, assembly, the right to petition government for a redress of greivances. I won't ask where's the outrage in Congress... or the press.

BTW: I heard Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thom Hartmann's AAR show Friday. A caller asked Sanders about the Siegelman prosecution and he had to take a moment to remind himself what the case was about before responding. I know the Senator is a busy man with many demands on his time, but I find it interesting that the issue of a political prosecution wasn't on the top of his mind.

Thank Goodness for Scott Horton and Harper's. Thanks for the heads-up, marmar.

OT: What's with the Tigers and Minnesota? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, no. that is the Legal Schnauzer blog.
I love that blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Legal Schnauzer link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kick for this important story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Big K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. All of the career advice sites
warn people that their employer can use information on the internet to fire them in an "at will" state. At the same time, it is supposedly illegal to fire someone for their political orientation. But these things NEVER work out well for the employee. They will make up another reason if they need to, and you're out of a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Are You Talking About Using The University's Computers, Or..
just publishing anything at all on the Internet ???

Because...

* The evidence is overwhelming that my termination was a "political hit." Specifically, clear evidence shows that I was fired simply because I write a blog that has to do with Don Siegelman. I feel certain that my original reporting on the Paul Minor case in Mississippi--and my own experiences with corrupt judges in Alabama--made certain folks in our state's Republican power structure unhappy. But I have irrefutable evidence that simply blogging about the Siegelman case was the driving factor behind my firing.

* Some might ask, "Schnauzer, sounds like you were blogging on UAB equipment and time. Isn't that why you were fired?" Nope. At a grievance hearing on my firing, the IT rep who conducted UAB's "investigation" stated that I had not written the first word on my blog using UAB resources. The university claims that I was "researching" my blog on UAB equipment. But part of my job description is to keep up with current events and issues that could become story ideas for university publications. The Siegelman case was the biggest story in Alabama for a two-year period, and Siegelman's codefendant (Richard Scrushy) is without question UAB's most famous alumnus. If I had ignored the Siegelman story, I would have been neglecting my duty. But in Karl Rove's Alabama, you can get fired at a public university for doing your job. I know because it happened to me.

* A word about my supervisor, Pam Powell: I've known Pam for almost the entire 19 years I've been at UAB. In my first seven years at the university, she sought me out to write for her publications, which I did (without compensation, I might add). In 1996, she hired me as an editor in her office. When I joined the group, we had four people (counting Pam) and five or six publications. When I was fired, we had 12 full-time people and about 20 publications. Doesn't sound like my performance was hurting the department does it? I'm 51 years old, and Pam has a clear pattern of preferring younger people in the positions that work closest with her. I've come to accept that and never thought it would have a major impact on my job status. But the fact is this: Pam has not been easy on folks who are in or near their 50s. During my time in the group, we've had three people who fit that description. Two of us were fired, and one almost had to be hospitalized when her blood pressure spiked due to job-related stress. In spite of that, I would describe my relationship with Pam as good--at least until her behavior took a turn toward the bizarre in December 2007. While I have serious concerns about my supervisor's behavior in this saga, evidence strongly suggests that her actions were not necessarily all of her own doing. In fact, evidence indicates that my termination was driven by political forces external to UAB. I have a real good idea about the path those forces followed, and who was driving them. Much more information will be coming about that.


Link: http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2008/07/blog-about-siegelman-lose-your-job.html

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm talking about what anyone can find using Google.
Whether its done on company time and network or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. How Does The Company Have Any Say In It ???
Not being obstinate here, truly wondering by what right they have anything to say about it at all.

I could see that if you were a public face of the company, and you disparaged your place of employment or what it produces, they might have a claim. But if I post that I voted for Kerry in 2004, and my Republican GW Bush supporting boss finds out... I can be fired???

How does this jive with the 1st Amendment?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. In an "at will" state they can fire you for any reason
or no reason at all, legally speaking. You don't fit in. Usually companies make up a reason that is related to work, as they don't like to be so honest about it. But a person usually knows when they are offending a manager. They aren't stopping you from speaking, just from working at their company. CORPORATIONS CAN DO ANYTHING THEY WANT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Being fired for exposing corruption should be something to be proud of~
well even if you're broke, at least you can look yourself in the mirror. Hopefully he will be hired by an honest joint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's the way I felt whenever my Dad grounded me for pointing out his hypocrisy
"Sorry DAD if you can drink, so can I! I don't care how young I am!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC