Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Most Important Event In US Economics In Almost 80 Years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:04 PM
Original message
The Most Important Event In US Economics In Almost 80 Years
Edited on Sun Jul-13-08 10:17 PM by MannyGoldstein
Happened tonight: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/washington/14fannie.html?hp">Treasury Acts to Save Mortgage Giants: Billions in Support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

"While senior Democratic and Republican officials in successive administrations have for many years repeatedly denied that the trillions of dollars of debt Fannie and Freddie issued is guaranteed, the package, if adopted, would bring the Treasury closer than ever to exposing taxpayers to potentially huge new liabilities. The two companies could face significant new losses this year as the wave of housing foreclosures continues. Officials seemed to suggest, however, that they had little choice but to intervene.

Our financial system is in full-throttle meltdown, and BushCo wants to take the government out along with it.

But did you see that &$#ing New Yorker cover? That makes me really, really, really, really, really, really, angry.

(Priorities, folks.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah, it's nuts. can you post a paragraph & headline for those who
don't want to register? thx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Done. Thanks For The Suggestion
I think that very few people really understand what a colossal problem this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act is never mentioned
and the major players that made it happened in the vast majority
of all articles or news reported.


http://www.progressivehistorians.com/2007/11/bill-clintons-role-in-mortgage-crisis.html


The next two weeks will be really rocky, watch the banks
and the FDIC.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Some folks here still put Bill Clinton on a pedestal.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. Crazy, ain't it ?
:crazy:

Almost like we've all been set up like bowling pins the last 25 years or so.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
57. Bill Clinton gave the pen he used to destroy Glass-Steagall to Billionaire Sanford Weill
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 09:29 PM by bushmeat
Billionaire Sanford I. Weill, who according to Louis Uchitelle made "Citigroup into the most powerful financial institution since the House of Morgan a century ago," has what I call the Wall of Me leading to his office, which he has decorated with tributes to him, including a dozen framed magazine covers. A major trophy is the pen Bill Clinton used to sign the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, a move which allowed Weill to create Citigroup. Fittingly, Citigroup is a major contributor to guess which current Democratic Presidential candidate?

Hillary Clinton (D) Top Contributors in the 2008 election cycle Citigroup Inc PAC $439,567

Just days after the administration (including the Treasury Department) agrees to support the repeal, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, the former co-chairman of a major Wall Street investment bank, Goldman Sachs, raises eyebrows by accepting a top job at Citigroup as Weill's chief lieutenant.



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/wallstreet/weill/demise.html
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?id=N00000019&cycle=2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Interesting. Weill gives gobs of money to Cornell
and keeps getting more and more buildings and colleges named after him. Including the medical school in Qatar. hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #61
72. ANN COULTER Went To Cornell!!! Coincidence?
She was my classmate.

(Oh, OK, Keith Olbermann also went there... there goes that hypothesis...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. so did Bill Maher.
and so did I. I was most pleased to learn about KO a few weeks ago

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Damn good school
and a recruiting ground for the CIA!

Just kidding, I have friends that went their too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. I Had Two Frat Buddies Who Went To The CIA From Cornell
And another that tried, but kept failing the lie detector test on "are you a homosexual".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. I know it was a well known school for recruitment
It had an excellent geo-political department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Actually, These Guys Were All Engineers
The two that went were geologists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. The Colorado School of Mines is or was
used as a recruitment area. I know that as a fact.
It makes for great cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. I Was Engineering 1985-ish. What About You?
And when was Maher?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #75
81. oh, just remembered - Janet Reno, Paul Wolfowitz, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 11:43 PM by JoeIsOneOfUs
...do we have a mixed bag or what.

1990s, Aggie!

edit - Maher 1978
http://www.cornell.edu/search/index.cfm?tab=facts&q=&id=1312
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. They Forgot Kurt Vonnegut and Huey Lewis
Just because they flunked out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. That is now well documented
I mentioned the dangers of this before the subprime
market went to hell.

In August of last year when the feds starting to loan to banks
I started adding it up.

I reached trillions and not one report of them paying it back.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. Ah, a Bob Dole fan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. You gotta be kidding me, Billy is up to his eyeballs in guilt on the housing crisis
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 09:30 PM by bushmeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. Another Bob Dole fan?
Jeez, how the hell did Clinton ever get elected in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #64
78. I Voted For Dole - What Of It? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #78
84. It's the gratutitous shots at Bill Clinton defenders that I would challenge.
Bill Clinton has to be among the least likely leaders to be on anyone's "pedestal". Most of his flaws are well known, well documented, and well publicized. People who still defend him just may do so out of the understanding that the alternative may have been worse and a lot of good came out of that era, despite the flaws.
Clinton has to bear some of the responsibility, but other countries allow similar banking relationships without the problems we are having. In fact, some European countries allow even more flexibility in what banks can own. That doesn't make it right, but it might have made some people think that it could be done in a responsible way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. everything happens by accident; just the magic workings of the market.
just coincidence ordinary folks lose their houses, buying power & jobs, while boa & their ilk concentrate further power & capital.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Notice that Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and other of the big players
that pushed this through are now also the ones that are in trouble?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. what do you make of that?
(personally, i'll only believe gs is really in trouble when i see all their assets sold off for pennies on the dollar & their execs in the poorhouse)

....but convince me.... :>)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. The shareholders and taxpayers are in trouble not the players and directors.
I have to say it was the largest grifter game
in the history of the world and the citizens and shareholders
were and are still the mark and we know who to thank for this

I don't see justice happening until a radical restructure of
the whole international system is evaluated for what it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. that i buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. Obviously they tried to screw us, but...
Part of the problem is the myopia of greed. The fund managers, CEO's etc. all focus no further than the end of the quarter, because the quarterly earnings determine the future of the stock price, and whether or not they get to keep their jobs. Who cares if all hell breaks loose a couple years down the line, we can't think more than three weeks ahead! This is a recipe for disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Capitalism is crisis yet again
Yawn.

IT. DOESN'T. FUCKING. WORK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
54. You said it for me. And note how the Free Marketeers run for the
Fed's to bail THEM out - while the rest of us are expected to bootstrap it alone when we fall on hard times.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlacivita Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. didn't you get your stimulus check? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. Karl Marx: "Give capitalists enough rope
and they'll hang themselves."

The problem is, they're dragging us onto the gallows while they run away with all the resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nationalize both Freddie and Fannie and distribute the assets equallly among the US citizenry.
That will solve your problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It Would Certainly Suck Less
This is going to be very ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. no, the citizenry just has to pay for the mess. the assets? fuggidabout it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. They are insolvent
after the assets were liquidated there wouldn't even be enough money to pay the creditors-- which likely include bunches and bunches of public pension funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Wow, that is serious. Well, never mind then. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetJaguar Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Stronger Regulatory Structure
"Therefore we must take steps to address the current situation as we move to a stronger regulatory structure.”
-Henry M. Paulson Jr. July 14, 2008

Sending out an S.R.S.

Sending out an S.R.S.

Sending out an S.R.S.

Sending out an S.R.S.....


Too late asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. If a Bush is in office, expect a banking crisis
they make so much money off of this crap and we taxpayers end up subsidizing their crimes. They can't allow these two to fail b/c it would be the beginning of complete meltdown of the real estate sector of the economy.

Sometimes I fantasize about pulling the rich jerk offs who have benefited from all this out of their offices and homes, tar and feathering them, and hanging them by their thumbs until they return their ill-gotten gains to the U.S. treasury. That would include, of course, Cheney, Erik wazzisname at Blackwater, ALL the Bush family, hedge fund managers...

the reason things got so bad during the French Revolution is because finances were so bad.

The filthy rich always seem to forget this. (and I do mean flithy, as in disgusting.) As Balzac noted, behind every great fortune is a great crime. I cannot think of anyone offhand that doesn't meet that criteria. I hope there are some, but I'm doubtful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. and "finances were so bad" in France because WHY? Because
the wealthy upper classes simply refused to pay taxes.

Hmmm. Sound familiar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Profits? Privatized. Risks? Socialized.
And if you're not in the income stream for those profits? Well, you're just a whiner, that's all. Now, pay your taxes, because Uncle Phil needs another hundred grand!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Excellent way to put it!
I'll be using this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XRubicon Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
43. I want that on a bumper sticker
It says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Meanwhile as Bernanke's young ward Paulson lights up a cigar with a C note...
"That was close boss!"

"Yes, my evil imp, it was, and they will never know what hit them until we are out of here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EbenezerMcIntosh Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Do you really need those dollars (worth a dime each) in your pocket?
Bow down to your corporate masters and hand it over. Fuck eating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. WTF?
"Officials said that after talking to senior lawmakers through the weekend, they expected that Congress would attach the proposals to a housing bill that could be completed and sent to the White House for approval as early as this week."


"While senior Democratic and Republican officials in successive administrations have for many years repeatedly denied that the trillions of dollars of debt Fannie and Freddie issued is guaranteed, the package, if adopted, would bring the Treasury closer than ever to exposing taxpayers to potentially huge new liabilities."


Why is Congress in such a hurry to stick it to the taxpayers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Pelosi and remoras will be waiting at the door to welcome this wonderfull legislation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Do You Have Any Idea Of How Much The Pelosis And Reids Would Be Out?
Look, fair is fair: they are better than we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Taxpayers easy to fool. Corporations control the big purse.
my .02 anyhow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. and if a D gets into office, he will clean up the mess and the Republicans will
learn nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. This ain't no ONE MAN job!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Thanks for the thread Manny I forgot to nominate it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 03:25 AM by TheWatcher
This is definitely that, and hardly anyone is paying attention to it.

Looking at the Futures right now, Wall Street seems to be stroking themselves to climax over it.

http://money.cnn.com/data/premarket/

Look for a Huge up day in the Markets tomorrow, and a neverending parade of jawboning, happy-talk, Orwellian Bots that will be storming the The Great Meadow, soothing all the sheep about how "The Worst Of The Credit Crisis Is Over.....No Really, Seriously This Time!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
29. some of us can be angry at more than one thing
the colossal fuckup of the economy has been in full-steam mode for some time now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
30. and the REPUBLICAN ECONOMIC DISASTER continues. . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
49. It will be called the Second Great Republican Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
33. I am equally worried about the government getting its hands on
Fannie and Freddie. Than going ahead and draining that institution dry.

The two financial experts on Lehrer report seemed to think that the panic about Freddie and Fannie was bizarre and mostly just that - a panic. Neither institution is in as much trouble as the fears surrounding them seems to indicate. What it reminds me of is the many fears that the Repugs continually point to regarding the solvency of the SDocial Security - and most of us know how badly the Repugs have wanted to help "manage" our Social Security funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Amen on the social security point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
59. like Carlin said
they will go after your Social Security too, and they will get it.

When is enough enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. is it facism yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drexel dave Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
55. It's been facism for a long time now
jus' keepin' it real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. One might argue that advent of voodoo economics (Reaganomics)
ranks right up there with the national debt spiraling from about $1 trillion to about $9 trillion in little more than a quarter century, so what's a few trillion dollars more other than another giant slide in the value of the dollar? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
37. Priorities indeed. K&R!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. And just how is Bill Clinton responsible for this? The Republicons in
Congress, especially "morans" like Phil Gramm, passed the deregulation bills. They were totally in control except for two years of Clinton's terms. I am tired of the Clintons being maimed here. We had a glowing economy under Clinton. He added 22 million new jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. he signed the repeal of the last act that was put in place
during the great depression....it set the stage for everything that is happening now.

google the glass-steagal bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Next You'll Be Telling Us That Clinton's NAFTA Cost Us Jobs!
And that Clinton's almost-free trade with China has hurt American manufacturing!

Ah jeez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. manny please do`t bring up rwanda
i mean poor susan got fired cause she said clinton was a monster(or something like that) but was she talking about hillary or bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlacivita Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
65. the bill passed with like 90 votes, less than 50 were repubs
the repubs alone didn't have enough to overturn a veto, so Clinton and the congressional democrats are equally responsible.

To be honest, even if the repubs had a veto-proof majority (which they didn't) i would still expect a democrat president to veto that bill just to be on record that it was a horrible idea.

I mean it basically comes down to allowing banks to replace ordinary peoples money with imaginary money (stocks) and hope their value doesn't go down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
77. He was the leader......... he pushed it, signed it and helped make it happen
You are living in a delusion if you think that
all your political leaders on either side are on your side.

Look at the other Bills that have passed lately.
No one is fooled anymore, except the fool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
41. if you missed the past lifetime.... WE ARE IN CLASS WARFARE... and ReaganOmics was the opening shot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. total warfare, but one side didn't know it or bother to show up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
44. K & R cringing. .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. The Treasury bailout makes U.S. Taxpayers responsible for over $5.0 trillion
...in debt now to pay-off hedge fund speculators while millions of homeowners loose their homes. This will be a scam bigger than anything witnessed in modern financial history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
47. Quite a legacy dumbfuck
and his handlers(rove&cheney)have foisted on the American People with their greedy ineptitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radhika Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. Renters with no tax breaks now subsidizing homeowners....
NO one has mentioned this on the various blogs. If the US taxpayers bail out Fred and Fannie, they essentially bolster homeowners and developers using funds from the total population. That means taxpayers who do not receive the tax benefits of an interest-deductible mortgage (as in renters, homeowners with no mortgages, or workers that are living in cars on a friends sofa) are taking on this huge debt to fund those who enjoy those privileges - not to mention house appreciation if the economy rebounds. Now, I am not suggesting the people of America lose their homes. I propose the bailout be funded by the mortgage and banking firms, tax increases on billionaires -- and to a lesser degree, average Americans.

I am also suggesting that this neo-socialistic era we are entering include 1) universal single-payer healthcare 2) rental deductions on income taxes and 3)regulations on developers that requires them to do green and low-income housing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Return To Taxing The Rich
Under Eisenhower, the wealthiest Americans paid about 50% in taxes, while the median American paid far less than today. And the economy was great.

Today, the wealthiest Americans only pay 17% in taxes, while the median American pays more than 30%. That's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
56. really angry, angry,angry
Krugman wrote a column on Fannie/Freddie today...http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/opinion/14krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Don't think this date will go down in history. Taxpayers being on the hook for Freddie/Fannie has been the market's operating assumption for years. The Treasury plan does signal a high-level surrender to the reality of the current real estate market meltdown.

On matters of higher priority...someplace around the fifth "really" it hit me- this guy is writing satire...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
62. let's see, when I graduated from college and learned a little personal finance
it was all about buying a house and investing in the stock market to ensure one's long-term security.

Hmmm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
67. This latest step, to effectively guarantee Fannie & Freddie, will be inflationary & devalue the $
That has to be a result of this action. We've seen significant erosion of the US dollar against other currencies. The Canadian dollar has advanced over 60% against the US dollar in the past 5-6 years.

It's going to get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. I honestly see a barter system emerging between
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 11:26 PM by Ichingcarpenter
people, although the 'economy' will continue.

The guy that bought my house, I made, in the early 80's in Austin
started a business back then that brought
like people together, such as carpenters, dentists,
farmers, electricians etc.

He made a money doing it and
had built a barter system from San Antonio to Austin.
Times were tough in the early 80s and I even used the system.

Back then we didn't have the internet, but I think
that this system will have a major comeback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
68. Takes over a decade to get the minimum wage increased
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 11:11 PM by DearAbby
we get a whiplash watching congress bail out Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, all on our dime...hell each person already owes tens of thousands to the national debt, whats a little bit more?


edit: STOP YUR WHINNING MY FRIENZ, SUCK IT UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. My sucking up has been outsourced to Drafur n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Cripes...
cheap foreign sweat-shop suckers chaps my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC