"There is a perception problem"

[babylonsister]

ANALYSIS-Civilian casualties fuel Afghan conflict
16 Jul 2008 09:34:23 GMT
Source: Reuters
By Jon Hemming


KABUL, July 16 (Reuters) - The killing of civilians in foreign military airstrikes is shattering Afghans' support for keeping international troops in their troubled land and driving angry young men into the arms of the Taliban, analysts say.

International troops do not target civilians and say they do their utmost to avoid harming them, but even as Taliban suicide bombers kill more innocents, it is foreign forces and the Afghan government they support that bear the brunt of the backlash.

"Such acts provoke public hatred towards internal and foreign forces and force people to join the enemy who encourages them to carry out terrorist and suicide attacks," said the state-run Hewad newspaper after the first of two controversial airstrikes this month.

First, Afghan officials say, U.S. aircraft killed 15 civilians in the northeast on July 4, then just three days later, hit a wedding in the east, killing 47, mostly women and children.

"The Americans will soon face new resistance with new motives if they continue such operations and do not care even a little about the lives of the people," the state-run daily Anis said.

While the U.S. military first of all denied civilians had been hit, then launched what is likely to be a lengthy investigation, most Afghans have already made up their minds.

"Such arbitrary bombing raids and brutal killings have been repeated so many times during the past nearly seven years that now it is difficult to believe these foreign forces have come to our country for assistance," the pro-government Weesa daily said.

"There is a perception problem," said NATO's civilian spokesman in Afghanistan, Mark Laity.

more...

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/ISL238298.htm

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

1. There is, indeed, a "perception problem".

The perception that we, of the west, are to "pick up the white man's burden" and bring our perception of civilization to their country and jam it down their throats by brute force.

Our, "perception" that they should be grateful for our noble efforts and line up for Big Macs and iPhones between the bouts of kissing our hands.

And, that they should be satisfied with apologies and investigations when we slaughter the citizenry to "protect" them.

[babylonsister]

2. Yes, and then there's the 'perception' that we're really good at

blowing up wedding parties...I'm so sick of 'us'.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x371262

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

3. It's way past time that we come to the realization that "they" are "us".

Human beings, not pawns on some political chessboard to be sacrificed for our "vital national interests".

[babylonsister]

5. I hear you, and agree. And am sad that the

distinction between pawns and humans hasn't been recognized in so long.

[bdamomma]

4. we will pay.

sadly if not us many more generations to come, how can we do this to our children.

[babylonsister]

6. Or their children? nt

[bdamomma]

7. true, both Afghanistani and Iraqi children who do not deserve

us killing them.