Tweety and *ucker -- "Bush should do the RIGHT THING and pardon Libby"

[Atman]

"He didn't rob a bank, he was just protecting his boss."

Okay. The standard is set by the GOP. TREASON is okay, it's JUST PROTECTING YOUR BOSS.

Blowjobs are impeachable offenses, though.

This, AFTER Tweety acknowledged that Cheney had all but committed "war crimes." Tweety's own words. WAR CRIMES by waging a war of aggression against Iraq.

But Bush should do "the right thing" and pardon Libby.

Republicans are the lowest form of treasonous scum on this planet.

.

[Demeter]

1. Bush Should Pardon Libby and Get His Ass Impeached?

Is that what they advocate?

[emulatorloo]

2. Um, This other thread says: "Tweety is eviscerating Kate O'Berne (National Review hack)"

about her demand that Scooter be pardoned.

What a delight to behold!"

:rofl:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x362974


Are you sure he isn't just baiting Tucker?

[Atman]

3. Tuckerbating?

:rofl:

.

[emulatorloo]

4. Tweaking his little bowtie until he squeaks out something outrageous!

:rofl:

[malaise]

7. Tweety changed his position as

soon as he changed studios. :rofl: :rofl:

[malaise]

5. Mindblowing scum

but it's all good. Let them expose themselves.

Credit the members of the Libby Lobby with gratitude, though it comes at a high price: exposing themselves as partisans for whom the war and politics mean more than the truth and law.
David Corn today.

[elfin]

6. Saw that, too and screamed at the tube

"Just following orders" and protecting treasonous acts apparently no problem for Matthews and Tucker (or "Ucker" ).

[AndyA]

14. Put an "F" in front of that "Ucker" and you've got it right.

Can't stand the guy.

[rudylarusso]

8. Just suppose

It’s 1997: Suppose that Bill Clinton had got it in his head that Timothy McVeigh was aided and abetted by Uzbekistan on the way to the Alfred P. Murrah Building. Uzbekistan is ruled by a fierce dictator—Shavkat Mirizyoyev. The Uzbek government is known for its human rights violations which include such horrific practices as boiling people alive. Uzbekistan also sits on some (not a lot of) oil reserves. Hillary Clinton is convinced that there is a connection between Mirizyoyev and the Oklahoma City bombing and that, worse yet, Uzbekistan is developing weapons of mass destruction. Bill Clinton orders the CIA to develop a dossier. Unconvinced by initial results, Hillary and George Stephanopoulos pressure the CIA. William Cohen, with the aid of Sandy Berger, creates his own internal intelligence arm. The raw data is cherry picked and stove piped. They learn of a report by the British that Tajikistan was supplying Uzbekistan with aluminum tubes suitable only for nuclear warheads. Hillary hears reports that the evidence is shaky. She asks the CIA to investigate. The CIA sends Howard Baker to Uzbekistan to look into it. He reports back to the CIA that the tubes are too small to be compatible with use in a nuclear device. Bill Clinton gives his State of the Union address and makes the case against Uzbekistan, including the dubious aluminum tube report. Baker believes that the President (who he voted for) is taking the wrong path and prints an article in the Washington Times—“What I did not find in Uzbekistan.” Hillary Clinton is livid. She finds out that Baker’s daughter is a CIA agent (she doesn’t care, or bother to find out, if she’s undercover) working on WMDs. She concludes that Baker was sent on a boondoggle as a result of nepotism. She instructs Dee Dee Myers to “leak” the news to selective sources. Sandy Berger and George Stephanopoulos join in the fun. Finally, Robert Scheer prints an article exposing the young Ms. Baker and the cover firm she used—Scaife & Ailes. The CIA, naturally, is upset by this obvious breach of security and reports the matter to the DOJ. Janet Reno refers the matter to Patrick Fitzgerald—an independent attorney of impeccable credentials. An investigation ensues. In the process, Sandy Berger lies repeatedly and often to the Grand Jury and the FBI. He is indicted. Tried. Convicted. Question: how would Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity or Anne Coulter react? Would they say that it was a travesty that Berger was convicted and that he should be immediately pardoned? Would they say that Hillary at all times acted above board and simply is the victim of blogging moonbats? Would they say that it is simply off the radar to consider impeaching Bill Clinton for leading us into a foolish war against Uzbekistan? I thought not.

[gratefultobelib]

9. Wow! Quite a post for your first one!

[BootinUp]

11. Welcome to DU Rudy....

Good post!

[Atman]

16. Dude, this is front page material!

Welcome to DU! Thanks for that post!


.

[daleo]

18. Yeah, that's great. n/t

[NI4NI]

19. Good Job, RudyLaRusso

Welcome to the Underground!

[malaise]

20. Great post n/t

[achtung_circus]

21. Blogging?

in 1997?

Other than that artistic licence you nailed it.

Welcome to DU

[BootinUp]

10. You trying to get me fired up?

I'm too tired ...to read this shit though. What an outrage.

[AnnInLa]

12. By that reasoning, all of the Nazis would have had to be pardoned

for their unspeakable crimes.

[Disturbed]

13. Tucker's father was one of the leading fund raisers for Libby.

Does Tucker ever mention that?

[senseandsensibility]

15. Wasn't it just yesterday that there was a tweety appreciation

thread on DU? It was very well received. He was respectfully referred to as Chris Matthews. I didn't add to it, however, since I knew he would be back in Tweety form before the week was out. Looks like he did so even sooner.

[Atman]

17. I wasn't part of it.

I've seen Tweety flapping in the wind too many times to fall for his bullshit anymore. He is bought and paid for by the GOP.

.