Road Scholar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:16 PM
Original message |
Have you ever wondered if the wire tapping had anything to do |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 02:20 PM by In_Transit
with the complete reversal of the democrats in congress? I mean could it be that some of the key ones like Nancy "you know who" are being extorted or blackmailed. I just don't understand it.I honestly believe that the whole eavesdropping scam was using terrorism as a smokescreen so they could dig up trash on political opponents.What do you think?
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Well it does most certainly BushCo is using blackmail to drive through its agenda |
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. what are they doing that could allow them to be blackmailed? |
|
anyone in the public light ought to be leading a squeaky clean life. They should know that they are under incredible scrutiny.
No skeletons= no blackmail
and NO, I cannot run for office, nor would I want to. I'm not going to pretend to be clean.
|
Road Scholar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. You know the usual stuff, affairs, secret bank accounts, |
|
personal stuff like a blue dress somewhere.
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I think it's obvious. Bribes, blackmail, anthrax threats, you name it. |
|
Anything goes w/ these guys.
|
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
6. YES, if I was a betting man I would bet on it, and have been saying that for a while now |
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It had everything to do with the cave in by much of the leadership. |
|
Not necessarily that someone had the goods on them based on wiretapping -- rather that they had been beiefed on the illegal wiretapping and had not objected nor tried to take any action to oppose it. They abetted a crime, both after the fact and before (since the activity went on after they were briefed).
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
8. of course you are right |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message |