NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:55 AM
Original message |
If nuts like McCain didn't support invading Iraq no surge would have been needed |
|
Doesn't that say more about who was right on this issue?
Don
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message |
1. So simple, so true. This should be brought up more when |
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, nuts like McCain, Clinton, Feinstein, Kerry, Kennedy, etc. etc. |
|
Just one more example that it is becoming more and more obvious that we're living under the two party/same corporate master system of government.
|
StClone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Every good thing has to end |
|
With or without the surge the invasion would have either "gotten better" or the media would have gotten better about ignoring it or highlighting that things are improving (Solders aren't getting electrocuted in KBR showers any more after nearly 8 years or so.)
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The original battle plans for Iraq, written by generals before the war, called |
|
for 300,000 to 500,000 troops needed to invade Iraq and keep it stable. Rummy ignored all this. The surge was just an attempt to redo what they had done so wrong.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message |