FKA MNChimpH8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:15 PM
Original message |
Who the hell is this nattering snot on Abrams |
|
She spoke more than the other three put together in the first segment and completely ignored Gen Clark's point that no President is required to defer to any general.
|
Speck Tater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. from the Washington Times. Mooney. 'nuf said. NT |
FKA MNChimpH8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. This is the one I was talking about and that explains everything |
|
Catherine Crier and Wes Clark are both sane humans.
|
curious one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. She is an ex-judge. I don't remember if she worked for Cnn, Fox, or even |
|
Court TV. I didn't recognize her after the plastic surgery.
|
lisa58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. She was on, but she's not the wingnut. |
|
I don't remember the wingnut's name, but she was screechy and stupid.
|
lisa58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-22-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. The ex-judge with plastic surgery led me to her... |
|
...I didn't watch so I don't know - Catherine Crier tends to be very constitutionally oriented and rarely (but sometimes) pisses me off.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |