L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:27 AM
Original message |
***** Official HOUSE JUDICIARY hearing = MUKASEY, deceptive election practices ***** |
|
Hearing just started and Conyers is discussing elections WEBCAST link: http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/calendar.html
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
1. CONYER: Key members of Bush Admin fail to appear because DoJ fails |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-23-08 09:30 AM by L. Coyote
Conyers talking about Rove failing to appear, failures of DoJ to produce documents, .....
AG has failed to appoint a single independent prosecutor....
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Conyers introducing Mukasey now, Mukasey opening statement |
|
after "absolutely not" allowing a brief colloquey by an R.
"There have been moments of disagreement" Mukasey = not evidence of broken system, evidence of genius of the system LOL
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Rep. Jerry Nalder has the first set of questions. Torture!! |
|
Nadler: Have you or anyone in the Dept. investigated interrogations before the Yoo memo?
Mukasey: I do not know!!
Nadler: Why can't we get the unclassified opinions?
Mukasey: Deliberative privilege.
Nadler: Are you asserting a new privilege?
Mukasey: One of the kinds of privilege we have.
|
Clovis Sangrail
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
4. no webcast link for today |
notadmblnd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Dated 7/23 Watch now four or 5th down the list. |
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Who the hell uses real media any more? |
|
Grrr..
That's what McCain would stream in.
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. I do all the time. It is a common streaming format. |
|
It is also a proprietary file format, so they have had an advantage in making users use their viewer.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Well, it was common in 1995. |
|
Not so much today. It's a horrible and obsolete product and format.
They don't make a player for my OS (XP64), but even if they did it would just be annoying ad-ware.
|
druidity33
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
mine keeps loading in Quicktime (which i do not have the latest plugin for)...
:(
Anyone got an audio link?
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
druidity33
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
that link doesn't work for me. But i found a different one through Emptywheel that's working fine.
Break now...
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
07/23/2008 WatchWebCast Full Committee 10:15 A.M. in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building Hearing on: Oversight of the U.S. Department of Justice
|
libnnc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
6. just for the record... |
|
Mukasey: "Are you going to place me under oath or something?"
Conyers: "No that won't be necessary."
|
VP505
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. IMHO, that gives Mukasey |
|
the green light to lie with impunity. Serious oversight, I don't think so.
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Not so. Lying to Congress is a felony. |
|
There is never a need to swear in a witness to Congress. It is more a formality and allows prosecution for perjury instead of lying to Congress.
|
fascisthunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
libnnc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Conyers just waved it off. Not necessary.
They aren't asking him any serious questions so far.
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
8. What is DoJ doing to prevent purges of legitimate voters? |
|
Mukasey: Provisional ballots!
Mukasey: I don't know that that in fact happened!! LOL.
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
17. thanks for headsup and thread. |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Rep. Jackson Lee: Civil Rights, Civil Liberties, ICE Raids |
|
broken watch list process delays in citizenship applications
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Rep. Maxine Waters: Civil Rights, Voting Rights, Discrimination Complaints |
|
Discrimination complaints in your own department? How many pending? Initiatives?
Less than 5% African-American FBI agents?
Mukasey: "I don't know"
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Illegal alien voters. Mukasey: Proper IDs needed to vote. |
|
The Rs are parading out their ruse again!!
Because Dems turned out in higher numbers in Indiana, this proves voter ID is a good idea ad gives legal vters enouh confdence to vote.
Mukasey: You do not cut down voter numbers with voter ID laws!! :rofl: THAT IS A LIE!!!!
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |
24. Rep. Wexler: How Admin effectively nullified Congress, subpoenas.. |
|
"unprecedented abuse of exective privilege"
FBI interviews related to Plame leak classified as White House business by DoJ.
Wexler: "Does your Justice Dept. consider all FBI investigators to be part of the White House?"
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
25. nevermind - question answered in last post :) |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-23-08 11:00 AM by JoeIsOneOfUs
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |
26. Mukasey: Executive Privilege is "discussions generally" in the Executive |
|
to provide information to the President.
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
28. I like this woman who's asking ?s now - Rove has to COME and claim privilege on each ? |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
30. Sanchez is cutting him off repeatedly to ask her questions. |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
34. she may as well get the ?s out for the record, because he's not giving real answers |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
29. Rep. Sanchez: Siegelman? "Do you support Karl Rove's..." |
|
claim of Executive Privilege.
Mukasey: "Don't know that" re case law that subpoenaed person must appear.
Sanchez: How can executive privilege be claimed by Rove regarding conversations with persons in Alabama?
No-bid contract to Ashcroft????
|
druidity33
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
|
This lady should be running the hearing. Give her more time!
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
32. can someone give me the brief version of Mukasey's background |
|
military? law? govmt?
Listening to a few of these answers, I'm agreeing with Biden's complaint before Senate Judiciary that Mukasey never answers ?s straight.
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. Reagan judge rises to top of US Court in NYC, involved in early anti-terror |
|
rulings, like approving use of evidence obtained by torture. Lawyers in the So NY USA offices also moved to DC to the White House legal staff when they needed more attorneys for Dem oversight. So NY is the USA office that handles lots of SEC matters, lots of corporate crime, things like letting Rs off easy.
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
36. very helpful, thanks. |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message |
37. Just saw this thread. They are in recess, are they coming back soon? |
|
Anybody know? I want to know if I have enough time to go grab lunch.
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
39. just started up again. |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
42. Thanks, it came back up just as I posted this |
|
Issa was up so I went out and got lunch. LOL
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
38. Issssssssssssssa is up |
|
sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
40. Who's the Maine-ah who's asking ?s |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. nevermind, on to the next one |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-23-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message |