Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republicans and Drilling - Possible responses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:00 PM
Original message
The Republicans and Drilling - Possible responses
Edited on Thu Jul-24-08 07:42 PM by FLDem5
A few possible one-liners for your use - please add any you have:

- Republicans won't release the Strategic Oil Reserve, which belongs to the taxpayers.

- Republicans want to drill, which will only make oil companies richer, Democrats want to create new working class jobs in solar and wind for millions of American workers.

- PLEASE, even T. Boone Pickens agrees we can't drill our way out of this one.

- A few year's worth of oil isn't worth trashing the environment any more.

- Guarantee me that the price of gas for the U.S. consumer will go down, and that the oil companies will not sell to the highest overseas bidder, namely China ...

- Refineries are running at full capacity, what is the point of getting more oil into the pipelines if it can't be refined?

- Where will all of this new oil be refined? Which new refinery? Oh, right, there are none. There are tankers full of oil sitting in line to be refined into gasoline. That wouldn't change if we drilled. How about one of these companies try to build a refinery? Oh, right, that would increase supply, and reduce their profit per gallon. Not gonna happen.

- since we're sending 2/3 more gas OUT of the country than we did just last year, why bother to drill more, since we don't keep it here anyway?

- ANWR contains about 10 billion gallons, US consumption is about 20 million gallons a day. This works out to be about 500 days supply, about a year and four months. This isn't about supply, it's ABOUT profit!




Post yours, we'll make a quick list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. A few more year's worth
of oil is not worth the wholesale environmental destruction it would render.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I modified yours to be more "my level of speech" friendly,
I hope you don't mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Angry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where will all of this new oil be refined? Which new refinery?

Oh, right, there are none. There are tankers full of oil sitting in line to be refined into gasoline. That wouldn't change if we drilled.

How about one of these companies try to build a refinery? Oh, right, that would increase supply, and reduce their profit per gallon. Not gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Guarantee me that the price of gas for the U.S. consumer will go down.
And that the oil companies will not sell to the highest overseas bidder, namely China ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Also, refineries are running at full capacity
what is the point of getting more oil into the pipelines if it can't be refined?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. a take on post # 2
I thought the problem was that there weren't any new refineries ... and why aren't the existing ones running at full production?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7.  - these are all GREAT! Keep them coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can't think of any right now, but this deserves more participation...
...and a kick and a rec.

Good job.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. since we're already sending 1/3 more gas OUT of the country than we did
Edited on Thu Jul-24-08 07:38 PM by AZDemDist6
just last year, why bother to drill more, since we don't keep it here anyway

:shrug:

edit cuz I had the % wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm not quite sure how to condense that
are you saying that we send out 2/3 of the oil that we drill for here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. exports of gas are up 33% over last year
WASHINGTON3 (Reuters) - While the U.S. oil industry want access to more federal lands to help reduce reliance on foreign suppliers, American-based companies are shipping record amounts of gasoline and diesel fuel to other countries.

A record 1.6 million barrels a day in U.S. refined petroleum products were exported during the first four months of this year, up 33 percent from 1.2 million barrels a day over the same period in 2007. Shipments this February topped 1.8 million barrels a day for the first time during any month,
according to final numbers from the Energy Department.

The surge in exports appears to contradict the pleas from the U.S. oil industry and the Bush administration for Congress to open more offshore waters and Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling.

.......

But environmentalists and other opponents to expanding drilling areas could seize on the record exports to argue Congress should not open more acres if U.S. refineries are churning crude oil into petroleum products that are sent out of the American market.

(Forbes, 7-3-08)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3618662&mesg_id=3618662

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Holy Crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. and here's why....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. LOL! Thanks for that link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mendocino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. ANWR contains about 10 billion gallons
US consumption is about 20 million gallons a day.

This works out to be about 500 days supply, about a year and four months.

This isn't about supply, it's ABOUT profit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Just to clarify, US consumption is about 21 million barrels/day, not gallons. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Big Oil already has 26 million acres of leases they're not using.
Why are they holding the leases if they aren't using the land?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. The USGS is not telling the truth concerning arctic energy resources
Edited on Thu Jul-24-08 08:45 PM by gbrooks
They recently published a preliminary resource estimate for arctic Oil and Gas resources totalling 90 Billion barrels of Oil and 1,670 Tcf of Natural Gas. The problem is this is not a resource estimate in the traditional sense since it ignores economic issues regarding development and production costs. See below that they are basing their estimates on the notion of 'technically recoverable' resources.

"Technically recoverable resources are those producible using currently available technology and industry practices. For the purposes of this study, the USGS did not consider economic factors such as the effects of permanent sea ice or oceanic water depth in its assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources." http://www.energycurrent.com/index.php?id=2&storyid=12060

This notion is based on the state of existing technology not existing productive capacity. In other words we have drill rig technology that works at arctic depths and weather conditions. However there are on ten deep drill rigs in the world and eight of them are locked in ten year leases off the coast of Brazil.

In other words the 90 Billion bbl oil, 1,670 Trillion cf gas figure is pure speculation with a conservative downstream production potential of 20 or 30 years.

These resources might as well be on Mars for the good they will do in our lifetime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC