Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pay day lenders spent $3.8 Million lobbying... in Virginia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 12:54 PM
Original message
Pay day lenders spent $3.8 Million lobbying... in Virginia
http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2008-07-25-0214.html

Lobbyists' spending sets record
Payday-lending backers spent $3.8 million while total topped $20 million

Payday lenders spent millions of dollars attempting to influence legislation before the General Assembly this year.

The payday-lending effort -- lenders spent an estimated $3.8 million on lobbying the legislature -- helped RT-D
FIRST push lobbyists' spending for the past year to more than $20 million.

The lobbying reports cover the period from May 1, 2007, to April 30, 2008, so lobbying for the recent transportation session is not included.

Payday lenders were successful in blocking a cap on interest rates but still face more restrictions than in the past when a new law takes effect Jan. 1.

About $3 million of the payday lenders' expenditures went for advertising and grassroots lobbying. The Community Financial Services Association of America, an umbrella group for the industry, spent $1.9 million on radio, television, print and Web advertising. Virginians for Financial Choices spent $928,000 on grassroots efforts.

In contrast to the proponents, opponents of payday lending spent $129,000.

Ward R. Scull III, a Newport News moving and storage executive and leader in the drive to clamp down on payday lenders, said industry spending will keep the issue alive.

"It's a drop in the bucket to payday lenders," he said. "It did force them to spend money they otherwise would not have spent and it added awareness, for better or for worse, in Virginia of the issue."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. We got rid of about 60% of these bottom feeding scumbag bastards here in Oregon.
We're far better off for doing it and the people that still use the remaining companies have a fair chance of using them as advertised, instead of the endless cycle of debt and collections the majority of the 'industry' creates.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I used to work at one of those places
And I'm sure the profit margin is far in excess of their expenditures to keep it legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC