Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Back to the Future: Speaker Christine Pelosi names David Addington

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 05:05 PM
Original message
Back to the Future: Speaker Christine Pelosi names David Addington
Back to the Future: Speaker Christine Pelosi names David Addington Co-Chair, Office of Congressional Ethics.

July 26, 2018

Press Release: "The Office of Congressional Ethics is essential to an effective ethics process in the House,” said Speaker Pelosi. “This bipartisan board of outside experts who will be charged with reviewing allegations of misconduct and making recommendations to the House Ethics Committee. With the creation of the Office of Congressional Ethics, we have brought a new element of transparency and accountability to the ethics process.”

Addington, who was instrumental in formulating the Bush administration’s strategy for The War on Terror, survived an effort to impeach Mr. Bush for programs that Mr. Addington largely crafted -- torture, illegal wiretapping and the illegal invasion of Iraq -- when Christine Pelosi’s mother famously took impeachment “off of the table”. Mr. Addington and most of his unindicted co-conspirators were never brought to trial after President Obama took office as it was thought that national healing was more important than partisan bickering.

Addington will succeed Porter Goss, appointed by the first woman Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, to the Office of Congressional Ethics in 2008. Goss began his career in the CIA assassins’ unit, Operation 40, which was tasked with unauthorized black ops in Cuba while President John F. Kennedy was negotiating with the USSR. He was instrumental in the Iran Contra Florida drug running operation, in tanking the House 9/11 investigation and later gutted the CIA for Dick Cheney.

Below: Porter Goss with sundry CIA assassins, second from the left.



When approached for comment, Speaker Pelosi said “No comment. Ethics are off the table.”




http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/pressreleases?id=0762
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds about right...
"The swamp" is not only not being "drained," it's getting deeper by the day.

Nancy needs to start up those pumps, ASAP, if not sooner...I hope she didn't buy her swamp pumps from Jeb Bush's crooked partners!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There's so much sh!t on Goss, I couldn't even do this as a straight piece.
Those people he's sitting with were involved in just about every major assasination from 1960 on.

This is why we impeach criminals. So they don't come back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Absolutely muthafukken right.
"This is why we impeach criminals. So they don't come back."

Refusal to impeach and then prosecute is tacit approval of future crimes. There is only one other way to take apart the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. "So they don't come back." ...But I have always heard that...
You put criminals in jail and some they even put to sleep, so that they are no longer a threat to society. Then when those evil felons come up for parole, you add some more hard time to their stay in the slammer, because they might still be a serious threat to we law abiding citizens. But then I guess that, that kind of "sh!t"(the law of the land)is for the rank and file taxpaying type citizen.

I think the folks in King W's court believe that they are totally "Above The Law" of the land. They dare congress to do it's job now. Bush Inc. have made up their "New Reality" and their big bluff/blitz has caused congress to throw in it's last card...impeachment. GAME OVER?

"We don't need no stinking checks and balances," Saddam Hussein 1989...or there abouts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. When our Democratic Speaker makes these appointments
Bush et al's "belief" that they are above the law seems more and more founded in fact. Maybe they are. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. jeez, Where did you get that pic?. . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's been around. So awful.
Usually in connection with Dallas although that doesn't pop up very much. One of the guys at the table claims to have been at Dallas and at Los Angeles. We don't even need to go there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_40

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. *SPLAT*
Either that was my brain exploding, or my drink spewing across my monitor; I can't quite decide. ;)

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The War of Terror really is Iran Contra polished up and gone mainstream
Edited on Sat Jul-26-08 11:33 PM by sfexpat2000
It's the same @ssholes. And Iran Contra was just the Bay of Pigs guys after Watergate. Here's an article that compares Terra with Irangate from 2006:

The Swift-Boating of America
By Greg Grandin

An illegal war, torture rooms, warrantless wiretapping, manipulated intelligence, secret prisons, disinformation planted in the press, graft, and billions of reconstruction dollars gone missing: just when it seemed that the Bush administration had reached its corruption quota comes a new scandal. This one is a bribery case involving defense contractors, Republican congressmen, prostitutes, secret Hawaiian getaways, Scottish castles, and -- wait for it -- the Watergate Hotel. At its center is the just ex-Executive Director of the CIA, Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, whose sole qualification for being appointed to that post by just ex-Director Porter Goss seems to have been his ability, while head of the Agency's Frankfurt post, to hand out bottled-water contracts to friends and show junketing politicians a good time.



http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2006/05/mother_of_all_scandals.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. A good read on the...
"The Swift-Boating of America"

Mob Rule = Bushism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. I can see Addington coming back. I can see that (and not just him)
especially since he won't be held accountable for his crimes....

That's exactly the kind of "healing" America engages in...Goss/Ethics

Goss will gloss and they will all come out smelling like roses.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Goss and Gates need to be added to deck of cards we should make
in honor of Octafish. Addington. They'll all be with us for some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. God this pisses me off. What was she thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. And what a great position to blackmail Congress from, no?
Maybe the appointment wasn't up to her but we should notice that Boehner was the Republlican who ostensibly helped make this "choice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. She's a crook, just like the rest of them !
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 04:51 PM by screembloodymurder
What are you thinking? I mean no offense, but how much proof do you need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. from 2004: Porter Goss? NO WAY! - Buzzflash
August 11, 2004

Porter Goss? NO WAY!

A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION
by One Citizen

On Tuesday, President George Bush nominated Porter Goss, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee to head the Central Intelligence Agency.

Before confirmation, Congress should fire these questions at Porter Goss at his upcoming CIA chief hearings.

Would Porter Goss swear to commit full CIA resources for the purpose of prosecuting the person(s) responsible for leaking the fact that Valerie Plame was a CIA undercover agent to the press? That leak is known to have badly undercut each and every CIA field agent's confidence that they could freely report intelligence without fear of reprisal from the Bush Administration. Since this is one National Security issue where George "Slam Dunk" Tenet let us all down, will Goss commit to repairing the damage?

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/04/08/con04330.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. Kinda like hiring Tony Soprano to run the Banking Oversight Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yep. I'm used t BushCo doing that but it's a little alarming when Pelosi does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. HuffPo: it's time to subpoena Porter Goss (2007)


In March 2005, then-CIA director Porter Goss told the Senate "there are no techniques...that are being employed that are in any way against the law or would ...be considered torture." When Senator John McCain asked him about waterboarding, Goss would say only that is was "an area of what I will call professional interrogation techniques."

We now know that the CIA destroyed videotaped evidence of the torture of terrorist suspect Abu Zubaydah, despite the fact there were ongoing federal court cases where the tapes might have been relevant as evidence and the 9/11 Commission had requested such evidence. The Congress must aggressively investigate this issue to discover whether or not criminal activity was being covered up and justice obstructed.

An Iran-Contra-style select committee must be formed with members of the House and Senate to hold serious hearings and begin a thorough investigation. This inquiry cannot be left to the Intelligence Committees because their members -- security hawks all -- have been severely compromised by their past condoning of torture in CIA interrogations. Only an entirely new committee, which Congress has the power to form in an instant, can begin to find out for the American people what was happening behind closed doors and whether or not heads should roll at Langley for obstruction of justice.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/its-time-to-subpoena-por_b_76377.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. Here'a lala's piece: Porter Goss on Ethics Committee?
July 25, 2008
Porter Goss on ethics committee?

So....

Former CIA Director Porter Goss has been appointed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) as co-chairman of the new Office of Congressional Ethics.

Let me see if I understand this:

1. A man who is alleged to have been involved in funneling large amounts of money in contracts to dubious "defense contractor" Brent Wilkes (whose companies were mostly on paper) knows something about ethics does he?

2. A man who is alleged to have been involved in the bribery of US Congressman Randy Duke Cunningham and took part in hooker parties along with his subordinates, knows something about ethics, does he?

3. A man who as the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee did not think it important to investigate the outing of CIA officer Valeria Plame Wilson by the White House as political pay-back, knows something about ethics, does he? This same who as a CIA officer himself should have known better, right?

http://www.atlargely.com/2008/07/porter-goss-on.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. do you think it's possible she is making this OUTRAGEOUS appointment as a way to show in code
she is being blackmailed? I'm not taking Pelosi's side but it's so outrageous that it causes one to wonder-WTF?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. We've hit a threshhold, that's for sure. I don't know, mod mom.
It's not possible for her not to know what Goss is.

If we can assume she knows what he is, the possibilities are sort of ugly. If he was somehow pushed on her, then we're in trouble. If she chose him, we're in trouble. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. be careful
the gender police are alleging that any attack on Pelosi is an attack on women - that criticism of how she is not doing her job and her choices is sexism at its finest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Pelosi can't be criticized because she's a woman?
The gender police need to go back for regrooving. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I know it is insane
but it is true

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. Commondreams: Porter Goss -- Cheney's Cat's Paw? (2004)
Comments from three former CIA analysts.

http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/0811-05.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
24. Sibel Edmonds replies to Porter Goss (2006)
Edited on Sun Jul-27-08 11:13 AM by sfexpat2000
Sibel Edmonds Replies to Porter Goss Op-Ed on Whistleblowers...

The Former FBI Translator Destroys the Current CIA Director's Latest Attempt at Misleading America...

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=2409
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Rep Pelosi is complicit in the Busholini Crimes.
She supported the Crimes. This is why she took Impeachment of Bush &/or Cheney "Off the table" which was not her prerogative to do. Other top Dems were complicit, as well. There was no blackmail. It was not needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. How can we remove her?
Who do we call? She's lost all confidence. I want her out or I'll vote third party. It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Even more than removing her, imho, it's a matter of bringing this corruption
up and into the disinfecting light.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC