Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Department of Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:08 PM
Original message
U.S. Department of Media
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 12:09 PM by davidswanson
Last Friday one of two things indisputably happened. Either a dozen senior Congress members and several well-known expert witnesses went certifiably and collectively insane, or charges of the most extreme executive abuses of power ever heard in the history of this nation were backed up by overwhelming evidence during a six-hour hearing of the House Judiciary Committee focused on the possible need to impeach the President and the Vice President. Either way, a nation with a public communications system worthy of a democracy would have learned the news.

What we actually have in this country is a news media conglomerate that functions as a part of the executive branch of the federal government. Call it the United States Department of Media. But "branch" is not the right word, since the executive branch is all that remains of our government (aside from whatever Dick Cheney is). The legislative and judicial branches have been eliminated. Or, rather, they are constantly and effectively being shut out of the government, in no small part by the Media Department. But "department," too, is not the right word if one imagines any degree of independent decision making. None of the so-called departments and agencies in the executive government are any longer empowered to make significant decisions independent of the president (and whatever Dick Cheney is). And the Media Department is no exception.

One project of the U.S. Department of Media is the Cover Nothing Network (CNN) on which associate deputy undersecretaries of Media Campbell Brown and Erica Hill reported on Friday that there is not enough time for impeachment and that if the Democrats led the way to impeachment voters would punish them, and that therefore the hearing was a waste of money that could have been better spent publicizing the president kissing babies. I'm not making any of this up. Here's video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bzx6ttmbTbs

Now, you'd think the Democrats would get credit for successfully violating the laws of physics by impeaching Bush and Cheney after CNN reported that there was not sufficient time to do so. Instead, CNN preemptively reports that instead of a Nobel prize in physics, Democrats would receive opposition from voters if they were to impeach Bush or Cheney, quite regardless of the supposed fact that there is not time to do so. Presumably it is part of CNN's passion for saving money that allows it to employ public officials too stupid to even realize they've done no research whatsoever that might provide them with the slightest clue as to whether or not what they are saying is complete horseshit.

Yet, most of the other state broadcast and cable and print outlets did even better at avoiding the news by reporting nothing at all. That fine performance didn't cost us a dime, and was worth every penny. But what did we miss?

Well, we missed the fact that the president now violates numerous laws and announces his intention to do so with "signing statements." This is absolutely unprecedented and indisputably a major violation of the basic outline of the U.S. Constitution. We missed that the current president has violated numerous requests, subpoenas, and contempt citations, effectively shutting down the Congress as a body with any right to control our government or even to know what our government is doing. We missed that this is completely unprecedented and a major violation of the basic system established by the Constitution, and that when Richard Nixon moved in the direction that this president has gone so far in, the Judiciary Committee voted to impeach Nixon. We missed that the current president has openly confessed to violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and that in this and numerous other cases impeachments of Bush and Cheney could be accomplished in under an hour, all the necessary information already being in the public domain.

That is to say, either we missed THAT and much more, or we missed witnessing the mass hypnosis of John Conyers, Hank Johnson, Bruce Fein, Tammy Baldwin, Vincent Bugliosi, Maurice Hinchey, Dennis Kucinich, Robert Wexler, Sheila Jackson-Lee, Liz Holtzman, Rocky Anderson, Elliott Adams, Bob Barr, Bobby Scott, Zoe Lofgren, Jerrold Nadler, and several other individuals, together with dozens of members of the public in the same room and hundreds more outside. Don't we have a right to know what happened? Who hypnotized them and why? How was it done? Who funded it? And is it possible that what actually occurred on Friday was a long-standing hypnosis wearing off momentarily? How will we ever know? And if we ourselves look at the White House website and appear to see numerous signing statements declaring the right to violate laws, and numerous public refusals to comply with subpoenas, are we going insane too? Are we falling into some sort of delusion? Are we secretly exploding with repressed anger and hatred for bibles, guns, and flags? And why do we hate our country so much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Campbell Brown married to the Fox
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 12:16 PM by seemslikeadream


Weekend Today co-anchor Campbell Brown, 37, and Dan Senor, 34, a FOX News analyst, were married on Sunday in Colorado.

The bride wore a Vera Wang gown at the afternoon ceremony, which took place at the Beaver Creek Chapel in Beaver Creek, Colo. After the "I do's," guests headed to Beaver Creek Mountain for a reception at the Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch resort.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1179281,00.html



SHAME ON YOU CAMPBELL BROWN
SHAME ON YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopewell1985 Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. WOW
She is hot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yea FASCISM is all the rage these days
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 12:40 PM by seemslikeadream
What better way to convey nazi principles than to wrap it up in a pretty package so one could spew the crap to the unsuspecting sheep. She's HOT I'll believe everything that vomits out of her mouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
desktop Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. CNN is a total joke now, a right wing one that is
Ted Turner was incensed when Rupert Murdoch started FOXnews here. He knew the destructive anti-human reputation of this man. Little did he know his own former network would start challenging FOX for the title as the most lying right wing propaganda network. PBS is the only neutral site left and republicans try every year to shut them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I don't know if you've noticed that PBS ain't exactly neutral anymore.
For every centrist person on a panel, there are 2 right wingers.

Thankfully they haven't been able to get rid of Bill Moyers yet.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Yep.
Pretty much gone as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. That's the truth. Ain't no real teevee news in the States. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Yeah, two years ago. Is this news? You didn't know until now? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Uhhhhhhhh DUH!~
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 09:23 PM by seemslikeadream
Didn't you hear what she said?

Last night on CNN? THAT'S THE NEWS BUDDY

What she said and WHO her husband is the news




Malloy has spent over an hour on this tonight also



Yea I knew it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yeah, I thought you'd know which is why I was confused. Based on previous "reporting" I'd seen from
Brown & Co. before, unfortunately I'm not surprised at the comments. It wasn't all surprising when Browm married that Bushco shill either.

"CNN...the most trusted name in news." Not.

Been home sick today so that probably contributed to my confusion & flat affect about this. But these days I'm surprised when they actually report the facts and truth. Those are infrequent and fleeting moments.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fascism. It is literally the elephant in the room. nt
14 points of fascism all laid out for those who are not too blind to see it.

U.S. Department of Media would be #6.

http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm

The above has become a fav or mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. case in point to your last paragraph: the shooter from Knoxville who blames the "libruls"
for everything that is wrong with Amurika and his life


Instead of the "department of media" why not call it the Department of - hey look over here Britney's shaved her head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am hoping the non-coverage
of hearings is going to have an unexpected consequence.
The MSM is not tainting the public opinion with their excessive talking points defending the administrations actions.

When the Impeachment gets underway the voting public and the rest of America will be confronted, due to the negligence of the MSM, with a litany of crimes, corruption, and Constitutional violations.

I have no choice other than to hope the Speaker, when viewing the extent of evidence from hearings in both the House and Senate, calls for Impeachment Hearings.

I read an interesting comment on www.askthespeaker.org - nobody has the authority to take any part of the Constitution out.

I wonder if she realizes this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is, indeed, life after TV news.
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 01:45 PM by SimpleTrend
Pay every month for subscriptions to watch non-news news AND commercial advertising? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Those signing statements?
Wasn't there a Supreme Court case regarding them? Didn't the Supremes rule they were unconstitutional? Kinda like the line item veto?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. No offense, David, but I think it would be more accurate to say that the U.S.
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 03:39 PM by bertman
government's Executive Branch is the revenue-collection and enforcement arm of the International Energy and Banking System, which uses the U.S. News Media Conglomerate as its Department of Propaganda Dissemination.

Just sayin'.


This is an excellent post. To see Campbell Brown and Erica Hill do their vaudeville routine the other day made my jaw drop. Despite years of watching numbnuts reports say ABSOLUTELY STUPID SHIT I was still caught totally off guard by their teenage-pajama-party approach to that news item. No pretense whatsoever of journalistic objectivity or curiosity. Just make it a fucking joke, girls. And who the hell do they quote but Trent Franks, who sounded like a fascist propagandist from Nazi Germany throughout the entire hearing.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why not go all the way
and call it what the Nazis did, the Ministry of Propaganda.
The RGNN (Rove Goebbels News Network).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You are correct. Ministry of Propaganda it is from now on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. A more accurate description for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC