Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice adviser: ‘The biggest stupid idea was to invade Iraq in the first place.’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:36 PM
Original message
Rice adviser: ‘The biggest stupid idea was to invade Iraq in the first place.’
Rice adviser: ‘The biggest stupid idea was to invade Iraq in the first place.’

Former Australian Army officer David Kilcullen, who helped Gen. David Petraeus “design his 2007 counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq,” is currently an adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. In a recent interview with Spencer Ackerman, Kilcullen, the main author of an upcoming handbook on counterinsurgency for senior policy-makers, said he tells them they should “think very, very carefully before intervening” in other countries. As an example, Kilcullen called the invasion of Iraq “f*cking stupid“:

More bluntly, Kilcullen, who helped Petraeus design his 2007 counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq, called the decision to invade Iraq “stupid” — in fact, he said “f*cking stupid” — and suggested that if policy-makers apply the manual’s lessons, similar wars can be avoided in the future.

“The biggest stupid idea,” Kilcullen said, “was to invade Iraq in the first place.”

more at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/28/rice-adviser-the-biggest-stupid-idea-was-to-invade-iraq-in-the-first-place/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, just Wow!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. NO! The biggest stupid idea was to elect Dubya as president. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It's a good thing he wasn't...twice.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Take that up with Justice Scalia
He's the one who elected him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. make that selected n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Bush wasn't elected, he was selected by one vote in the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. heh. Maybe you would like to reconsider that point?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Why? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Try NEVER elected.
And be truthful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Like you, I'm well aware of the debacle that led to Dubya taking office in 2001 and 2005.
Nevertheless history will record those as elections in spite of any protest that you or I might make.

If it makes you feel good to say "selected" rather than "elected", go for it, but at this point it no longer concerns me.

I have much more important things that worry me among which is bringing our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Have a peaceful evening, :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. Not necessarily my good man, not necessarily. In spite of continued rethuglican attempts to revise
and rewrite electoral history, there is an ACTIVE movement in our country to re-examine elections 2000, 2002, 2004, and the only reason this is continuing is because good people are just not going to "get over it." I too am concerned with bringing our troops home from these illegal, immoral wars. But I do believe that if we do not learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. Sorry, but to decide the most severe electoral fraud in our nation's history "no longer concerns me" is to acquiesce to their crimes. No one said correcting these hideous miscarriages of electoral justice would be easy or swift. But I believe it must be done. We can deal with it now or we can deal with it again and again and again. And that, my friend, definitely concerns me.

You pick your battles. I'll pick mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. Even more stupid was to re-elect him?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. bush*/cheney* were NEVER LEGALLY AND LAWFULLY ELECTED.!
Edited on Tue Jul-29-08 10:29 AM by Raster
According to the News Consortium, Al Gore won Florida. And once you factor in Jeb and Cruella's dirty tricks, it becomes apparent that Gore won Florida by a large margin. Ah the beauty of controlling a state's election infrastructure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. See #26. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. See #35.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. What makes him believe they want to avoid future wars???
Ain't no money in peace. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Can't have disaster capitalism without the disaster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Peace is rather profitable
But it's profitable to MANY people, and that's not what they want.

They want HUGE profits(Legalized Looting) in a small number of hand(consolidation) and a relaxing of the legal oversight(Legal immunity for the people in charge).

You don't get that in peace. In peace, you get happy, productive people who look for better ways of doing things(Clean energy, for instance), get better educations and have more of a voice.

That is their worst nightmare. Happy, empowered progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Policy makers need a manual to avoid invading sovereign nations?
Wow, How did we manage for so long without that kind of insight - and blunder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, a double whammy in one week!
First we get Bush admitting that Wall Street got drunk with power... now this! What's next?

Fuck, even Scott McClellan is turning on his former boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yuh think?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nope that was the 3rd,,
The 2nd was to elect Bush the 2nd time
The 1st was his Supreme Selection!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. bush was not elected a second time either.
KKKarl stole it for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Rove stole it?
He certainly had something to do with it, but Bush won the election by carrying Ohio after many citizens had their right to vote thrown down a deep, black well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. what ever, thrown out, switched.. whatever way you want to color it. It was rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. I prefer that Ohio votes were thrown down a black well
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Got that, McWhine? The invasion you supported was stupid.
And so are you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. (I miss molly) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why is an Australian an advisor to the Secretary of State? No Americans with the
qualifications?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Apparently, none that would work for the War Chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. It was not "stupid" - it was a crime that didn't go as planned, like a botched bank robbery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, they have gotten away with the loot.
So far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Unless, of course, the idea was to win Republican elections. Then it really worked!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yeah, that's what we thought and now over 4000 dead Soldiers,
5 years, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis Dead, how many trillion$$$$..it all came tragically true.

But, the mainstreammediawhores will not admit they marched the drum to war..the little creepy press and mediawhores should all be indicted along with the bushites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. yeah-wow
he's a day late & a dollar short-- like everyone in this administration. it makes me sick-- if they weren't in politics they'd be jobless!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I'm a mommy in a small city in Ohio
And I knew they had no reason to go into Iraq!
How come I had more info about it than the leaders of this country!

Now it wasn't a good idea!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC