Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John McCain,as Chair of International Republican Institute has Stronger NEOCON Roots Than Many Think

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:02 PM
Original message
John McCain,as Chair of International Republican Institute has Stronger NEOCON Roots Than Many Think
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 02:02 PM by mod mom
IN TODAY'S NYT THERE IS AN ARTICLE ON JOHN MCCAIN AND HIS TIES TO THE INTERNATIONAL REPUBLICAN INSTITUTE (IRI) THAT GOT LITTLE ATTENTION ON DU:

Democracy Group Gives Donors Access to McCain

HONORS FROM THE CHAIRMAN Senator John McCain presenting Freedom Awards from the International Republican Institute to Vice President Dick Cheney in 2001; Condoleezza Rice, now the secretary of state, in 2004; and President Bush in 2005.

By MIKE McINTIRE
Published: July 28, 2008
As Senator John McCain waited to speak at the annual awards dinner of the International Republican Institute, a democracy-building group he has led for 15 years, lobbyists and business executives dominated the stage at a Washington hotel ballroom.


First up that night in September 2006 was the institute’s vice chairman, Peter T. Madigan, a McCain campaign fund-raiser and lobbyist whose clients span the globe, from Dubai to Colombia. He thanked Timothy P. McKone, an AT&T lobbyist and McCain fund-raiser, for helping with the dinner arrangements and then introduced the chairman of AT&T,Edward E. Whitacre Jr., whose company had donated $200,000 for the event.

-snip

Today, with a budget of about $78 million and 400 employees working in 70 countries, the Republican institute has grown in size and stature. Its recent work has included organizing debates for candidates in Iraq, conducting a rare public opinion poll in Cuba and training political parties in Belarus.

Yet while the institute says its activities are nonpartisan and peaceful, left-leaning groups have long accused it of improper meddling in pursuit of a neoconservative agenda. A former American ambassador to Haiti has asserted that institute operatives undermined reconciliation efforts among Haitian political rivals, contributing to a coup in 2004. Two years earlier, the institute was criticized after its president at the time, George A. Folsom, praised a coup attempt against Venezuela’s leftist president, Hugo Chávez.

Major staffing decisions and appointments are a board matter; as chairman, Mr. McCain has played a significant, often decisive, role. His early choices show an attempt to balance the demands of politics, professionalism and personal loyalty. Bucking party officials, Mr. McCain successfully pushed for R. Bruce McColm, a human rights expert who was not an active Republican, to replace Mr. Buechner. John Dowd, the senator’s personal lawyer in the Keating Five scandal during the savings-and-loan crisis, became the institute’s general counsel, and Mr. Craner became vice president.

-snip


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/us/politics/28IRI.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin


International Republican Institute
Loosely affiliated with the Republican Party, the International Republican Insitute (IRI) works closely with the the National Endowment for Democracy and United States foreign policy instruments, including the U.S. Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development, to support economic and political development programs around the world. The organization is almost exclusively funded by the U.S. government and related agencies.
IRI's stated mission is to "support the growth of political and economic freedom, good governance and human rights around the world by educating people, parties and governments on the values and practices of democracy." However, it has also been linked to efforts to foment a violent military coup in Haiti. Max Blumenthal reports that Stanley Lucas is the program officer for the IRI's Haiti program. <1>


IRI Board of Directors and Personnel includes John McCain as chairman, Chuck Hagel, Randy Scheunemann many many others see link below.

http://www.iri.org/board.asp

MAX BLUMENTHAL WAS INTERVIEWED IN 2004 ON DEMOCRACY NOW REGARDING IRI's ROLE IN A VIOLENT COUP IN HAITI:
July 20, 2004
Did the Bush Administration Allow a Network of Right-Wing Republicans to Foment a Violent Coup in Haiti?
We speak with Max Blumenthal contibutor to Salon.com and author of a new investigative piece that examines the role of the United States in destabilizing the democratically-elected government of Jean Bertrand-Aristide through the International Republican Institute, a federally-funded, nonprofit political group backed by powerful Republicans close to the Bush administration.

-snip

The IRI, a nonprofit political group backed by powerful Republicans close to the Bush administration, initiated the destabilization of Aristide’s government by imposing harsh sanctions, training Aristide’s political opponents and encouraging them to reject internationally-sanctioned power-sharing agreements. Haiti’s political crisis eventually escalated into violence until Aristide was overthrown in February of this year in what he calls a modern-day kidnapping in the service of a coup backed by the United States.

-snip

MAX BLUMENTHAL: Well, to tell you about Stanley Lucas, and he is the program officer for the International Republican Institute, or I.R.I.‘s Haiti program. I.R.I. is active in 50 countries worldwide on a mission to “promote democracy”. In many of their programs, through their means, what they have demonstrated is something quite different. They have demonstrated—I.R.I has demonstrated a penchant for backing opponents in regimes deemed hostile to the U.S. and specifically to conservative interests, and I.R.I.’s program in Haiti has been probably its most bellicose thanks to Stanley Lucas. In Haiti there’s two sectors of Haitian society that are the traditional obstructionists to progressive change. Number one, that’s the industrial sector of the mulatto elite who run the sweatshops and lead the civil society wing of Aristide’s opposition. And two, there’s the military, which guarantees the conditions by which the elite can operate their sweatshops. Aristide disbanded the military in 1995, so, you know, the military hates him. Stanley Lucas is a bridge between these two sectors. He was schooled in Haiti’s finest schools with members of the mulatto elite. At the same time, he comes from a wealthy land owning family close to the Duvalier regime, which ruled Haiti with an iron fist for decades. His family is close to the military. Two of Stanley Lucas’s cousins massacred—organized a massacre of 250 peasants, in 1987, who were protesting for land reform after the Duvalier regime crumbled. The massacre—it was a terrible massacre documented by Amnesty International and described to me by someone who witnessed it firsthand. You would think that someone from this background wouldn’t be able to get a position at a group like the International Republican Institute that promotes democracy. However, Stanley Lucas is a valuable asset to them. He is a judo master who allegedly trained the military in counter insurgency tactics after the Duvalier regime collapsed. He was hired in 1992, but I don’t know why he was hired. When I asked I.R.I.‘s communications director why he was hired, he refused to tell me why, or what his duties consisted of between 1992 and 1998. A lot of people I spoke to suspect that Stanley Lucas is a CIA asset, including former ambassador—former U.S. Ambassador in the region. So, when Stanley Lucas was hired in 1992, the country was controlled by a military junta called FRAPP, which had ousted Aristide in 1990—in the first coup in that country. Frappe was busy massacring thousands of Aristide supporters. One off the recorded sources, who lived with Lucas, working with Lucas, in Haiti, told me he saw documents indicating that while Lucas was working for I.R.I., he was being paid by Michelle Francois, who was a notorious FRAPP leader. Stanley Lucas is an impeccable dresser, a smooth operater and a lady’s man with a broad smile and childlike demeanor that will put his enemies at ease. You have behind that facade an evil man who has been given way too much power. In my piece, I compared him to Achmed Chalabi, because Stanley Lucas is a card-carrying Republican who managed to ingratiate himself with powerful Republicans in Washington. He lobbied for the opposition to Aristide and managed to tie quite a bit of funding to them and introduced a number of Aristide’s most virulent opponents to powerful Republicans in Washington. When I.R.I.‘s campaign to destabilize Haiti began in earnest in 1998 with a $2 million grant in mostly taxpayer money from the U.S. Agency for International Development, Lucas hosted some of Aristide’s most virulent opponents in political training sessions. What he did was he merged all of these disparate groups into one big party called the Democratic Convergence. Now, the Democratic Convergence is not a traditional political party, it’s more like the political wing of a coup, because the strategy that it took was to forego the democratic process entirely. Boycott elections and initiate what seemed like an endless sequence of provocative protests. Between 2000 and 2002, the Democratic Convergence rejected over 20 internationally sanctioned power sharing agreements which heightened the tension and provoked more violence. At the time, the U.S. Ambassador, who was named Brian Dean Curran, a Clinton appointee, who was a highly respected career diplomat, uncovered evidence that Stanley Lucas was the one encouraging the Democratic Convergence to reject the compromises and to stay out of the democratic process. When he presented this evidence to the U.S. Agency for International Development, and he asked them to block Stanley Lucas from the program, Bush’s Assistant Secretary for the Western Hemisphere, Roger Noriega, apparently stepped in, and within four months—Lucas was barred for four months, but after four months, he was back. So, when he—when Lucas returned to the program, he retaliated against Ambassador Curran. What he did was he spread salacious rumors in Port-au-Prince in—and in Washington about Curran’s personal life. If I repeated these rumors, it would make Dick Cheney look like Ward Cleaver. It’s unheard of for someone like Lucas to actually sabotage a U.S. Ambassador. Lucas threatened two embassy officials and told them they would be fired once the real—“Real” U.S. policy was implemented. In 2003, Curran was forced to resign in disgust because of Lucas’s activities and the fact that Bush administration seemed to give Lucas their tacit approval. A number of embassy officials I spoke to were removed from Haiti by Roger Noriega for opposing what Stanley Lucas was doing in part. So this whole sad episode that led up to the coup was allowed to occur because of Bush’s policy of studied neglect in South America.

-snip

http://www.democracynow.org/2004/7/20/did_the_bush_administration_allow_a

TPM MUCKRAKER MRS. PANSTREPPON HAS MADE SOME INTERESTING CONNECTIONS TODAY:

John McCain & International Republican Institute: NYT Glosses over $18M Blackwater Bill

By Mrs Panstreppon - July 28, 2008, 8:33AM
-snip
But McIntire never touches on the enormous increase in IRI government funding since Bush took office. Nor did he question the whopping $18 million the IRI paid to Blackwater in 2005 and possibly 2006.
-snip
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/07/john-mccain-international-repu.php

SO GOOD OLE MAVERICK JOHN MCCAIN IS A LOT DEEPER INTO THE NEOCON WORLD THAN PREVIOUS REVEALED. HAS OTHERS HERE FOLLOWED THIS? (IT'S NEW TO ME) I WAS SHOCKED TO SEE CHUCK HAGEL 'S NAME AS WELL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. MORE MUCK: Taxpayer Funds for Center for a Free Cuba (backed by IRI):
-snip

But the story doesn't end there. Looking into the Center for a Free Cuba finds it backed by the International Republican Institute, which is chaired by (drumroll) John McCain.



IRI’s board of directors is chaired by U.S. Senator John McCain and includes former Secretary of State Lawrence S. Eagleburger, former Presidential Envoy to Iraq L. Paul Bremer, III and former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft

The IRI website proclaims it to be, "a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization committed to advancing freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, good governance and the rule of law."


But the Council on Hemispheric Affairs says, "The International Republican Institute’s ostensible democracy-building mission serves only as a screen for its energetic and unscrupulous promotion of an ultraconservative Republican foreign policy agenda.", and that it's Cuba program is a, "blatant attempt to funnel taxpayer funds to boondoggle programs of some of the most hardline factions of the Cuban-American community, who have long been a crucial pillar of support for the Republican party, especially in Florida."


It goes on to say, "Despite its elaborate rhetoric and claims to nonpartisanship, the IRI in fact operates as the powerful and well-funded foreign policy arm of the ultra rightist wing of the U.S. Republican Party.", and, "IRI’s seemingly innocuous activities, which are said to include party-building, media training, the organization of leadership trainings, the dissemination of newsletters and the strengthening of 'civil society', mask a far more aggressive and calculated attempt by the organization and affiliated hard right Republican Party ideologues to destabilize liberal political movements and governments (which it sees as containing the germ plasm of communism) in this hemisphere and around the world. Its central, though unstated, mission is to see to it that such vanguard movements have leaders perceived as being more agreeable to Washington’s orientation on a given issue.", and states also that, "Entities backed by the IRI, on the other hand, invariably show marked solicitude for the interests of large U.S. financial institutions and corporations—such as Chiquita Banana, whose former chairman Carl Lindner has long been one of the country’s primary donors of soft money to the Republican Party and was recently named a 'Super Ranger' fundraiser for the Bush-Cheney reelection campaign."

-snip
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/07/the-international-republican-i.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Your Taxpayer funds compliments the * Administration:
-snip

A report by the Cuban-American National Foundation released in May showed that less than 17 percent of $65 million in federal Cuba aid funds spent during the past 10 years went to ''direct, on-island assistance.'' The bulk of the money, the report said, went to academic studies and expenses of exile organizations, mostly in Miami and Washington.

The report echoed findings by The Miami Herald in 2006 and a congressional Government Accountability Office audit that found lax oversight of the programs and came as the Bush administration prepares to dole out a record $45.7 million in Cuba democracy grants.

-snip

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/story/612979.html

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Center for a Free Cuba" is basically a money laundering operation
when it's not busy sponsoring terrorism against pro-Cuba folks in Miami or against Cuba itself. And, yeah, that's our money these mfers are using to fund their scams!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=405x6432

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Just like they used taxpayer $ for HAVA they use it to spread taxpayer $ to fund
their other scams as well.

I don't get Cass Sunstein's recent comment that they have to see if law breaking is egregious enough-Egregious enough? My head is ready to explode! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's exactly the same business model. They get to use our money
to scr@w us, enrich themselves and they wrap themselves in the flag while the deed is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. We know their motive but what about the congressional enablers? That's the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Imho, there's a lot of back scratching going on.
But, I'm an optimist. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. No wonder they didn't want Obama to speak to Castro or his brother.
Hagel bothers me, too. Surely, he isn't a plant.

How many more groups like this are in operation? This invites deeper investigation and a whole lot of answers.

How much more has to be told before people take to the streets? I keep thinking there can't be more disclosures, but they are like the bunny that keeps going and going and going. Same names, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bush Family ties to Cuba (more robber baron stuff):
KEVIN PHILLIPS: George H. Walker was a real piece of work. I mean, he was a buccaneer. He was sort of a Joe Kennedy, but with a social register type qualification. He got involved in the 1920's with a bunch of Cuban companies, because of his ties to Percy Rockefeller and the National City Bank. They handled a lot of investments in Cuba. He was a director during the 1920's of eight or nine Cuban companies. George H. Walker had ties to the -- investment ties that were independent, so he had invested in some of these companies. One of them turned out several -- several turned out to merge into something called West Indies Sugar. West Indies Sugar became one of the major American companies in Cuba, and George H. Walker Jr., the son of George H. Walker and Prescott, Bush's cousin was a director, held a family seat on West Indies Sugar. Now during the late 1950's, West Indies Sugar was based in the Indy province in Cuba. That's where the Castro insurgency was developing. Castro and his people sort of shook down West Indies Sugar. They used their trucks and hit them up for money and so forth. They were unhappy with the Castro movement. In 1959 or 1960, I forget which year, Castro's people nationalized West Indies Sugar, and at this time George H. W. Bush's uncle was Director of West Indies Sugar. The value of West Indies sugar had been about $50 million and it wound up being virtually peanuts. I don't know how much their stake was. I couldn't begin to guess. It may not have been nearly as much as one would suggest from the bigger numbers. They were an unhappy set of campers when West Indies Sugar went bye-bye.

-snip

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/12/1448237

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Remember this snapshot from my Porter Goss thread?
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 03:01 PM by sfexpat2000
This is a snapshot of the Operation 40 guys, aka, a CIA assassins unit.

Well, if you go to the Wiki link, you find several of them are anti-Castro Cubans and those are the same guys (or their spawn) who are involved in the same scams today. It's all in the family.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ah yes...I remember all about them from Octafish's excellent threads as well.
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 03:00 PM by mod mom
I usually put the NSA Act of 47 as the start of the organized crime, but sometimes go back to the FDR coup. RICO anyone?

BTW WTF was Nancy thinking? Is she one of them, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't know but someone has to find out.
I'm at the point where I'm afraid to ask. It's one thing to disagree with her impeachment decision. It's another to see her putting people like Goss in an oversight position - not to mention, in a position to blackmail Congressional Democrats. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. International Republican Institute, a democracy-building group
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Democracy must not mean what I think it means.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC