Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why isn't dick cheney called before congress to explain where his energy policy went wrong.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:16 PM
Original message
why isn't dick cheney called before congress to explain where his energy policy went wrong.
after all, it was the dick cheney energy task force that put us where we are.

when cheney and bu$h* took office gasoline was about 1.49.

***snip***In his second week in office George W. Bush created the task force, officially known as the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG) with Dick Cheney as chairman. This group was supposed to “develop a national energy policy designed to help the private sector, and, as necessary and appropriate, State and local governments, promote dependable, affordable, and environmentally sound production and distribution of energy for the future."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Task_Force
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because this Congress has no power to do anything...
apart from what King George wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you'd think they might want to at least make a point....we are reaping the rewards of dickies progra
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 04:23 PM by spanone
m. like why didn't cheney warn us of the impending prices to come? why hasn't cheney called the oil producing nations together for an 'oil summit' to discuss the world's energy crisis?

you know, shit normal people when confronted with a crisis would do? just normal fucking questions....especially since the white house is blaming democrats for the problem since we can't

drill offshore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. They seem oblivious to Republican hypocrisy
Since the MSM has so utterly failed to do its job, it's only the comedy shows that seem to be able to find incriminating video clips which showcase Republican double-talk.

Yet the Democrats promise us that they'll "do more" if and when they gain a full majority in both houses of Congress. Yet the hobbled Republican minority seems able to easily thwart anything the Dems do.

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Apparently a woman who claims she was groped by a sitting president
has more power to get access to every piece of information, from visitor logs to attorney's notes, than the Congress has to find out what an incompetent president and a devious vice-president did to bring on the collapse of our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. when cheney and bu$h* took office gasoline was about 1.49
*sigh*

As for why congress won't do anything... ya got me. Cowardice? Complicity? Either way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If Congress requested his appearance, Cheney would just say
"Go fuck yourselves". He would never show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. according to cheney, nothing went wrong. but i say, make him say 'go fuck yourselves'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm with you... force him to show his indifference. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The energy policy went totally, absolutely right, in fact -- just look at Exxon-Mobil's financial
statements for the past several quarters -- what more could be expected from a Cheney energy policy than that, for goodness sake???

Certainly you didn't expect Dick Cheney, Halliburton Exec extrordinaire, to come up with a policy that would benefit the riff-raff???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because he never made the policy public.
Hell, he never even told us who was on it.

That should have been the first inclination of impeachment right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yes, but there is enough evidence to question...read this
The Washington Post reported on November 15, 2005 that it had obtained documents detailing how executives from major oil corporations, including Exxon-Mobil Corp., Conoco, Royal Dutch Shell Oil Corp., and the American subsidiary of British Petroleum met with Energy Task Force participants while they were developing national energy policy. Vice President Cheney was reported to have met personally with the Chief Executive Officer of BP (formerly British Petroleum) during the time of the Energy Task Force's activities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_task_force
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You'd think more Americans would be curious about what went on, huh?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. you'd think...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. they haven't made a taser yet that can overcome that fibrillator heart in his cybercarcass.
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 05:07 PM by librechik
and the rest of the time he just hides in the shadows, if you will. If Rove doesn't respond to subpoenas, why should he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because it didn't. Their policy has been to enrich themselves
and their immoral friends all along. Goddam bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. And I agree with the OP, wouldn't it be nice
to hear him admit that publicly ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. it didn't go wrong, it went exactly as he planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Indeed! Worked out well for him and his oily bidness buds.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
19.  On 5 March 2002 the US Government was ordered to make a full disclosure; this has not happened
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 06:45 PM by spanone
pending appeal.

In the Summer of 2003 a partial disclosure of these materials was made by the Commerce Department. This resulted in the release of documents, maps, and charts, dated March 2001, of Iraq's, Saudi Arabia's and United Arab Emirates' oil fields, pipelines, refineries, tanker terminals and development projects. That case eventually went to the Supreme Court and the ruling was to send the case back to the Court of Appeals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_task_force


you can bet today's supreme court would have taken the case and ruled in favor of cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC