Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WIRED News:How Carlyle Group pulled off $325 million deal with a blacklisted Russian weapons company

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 10:53 AM
Original message
WIRED News:How Carlyle Group pulled off $325 million deal with a blacklisted Russian weapons company

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/07/how-to-do-busin.html#more

How to Do Business With a Blacklisted Russian Weapons Company

We now know that the U.S. Army handed out a sole-sourced deal to sell nearly two dozen Russian Mi-17 helicopters to Iraq. But the lingering question is, how?

Rosoboronexport, the Russian state agency in charge of military exports, is blacklisted from working on U.S. government deals. So how did the U.S. Army and the Carlyle Group-owned company ARINC manage to pull off the $325 million deal? Or more to the point, did they knowingly violate this ban?

Let's talk about that ban. In July 2006, Rosoboronexport was accused by the U.S. government of violating the Iran-Syria Nonproliferation Act and was placed on what is informally called a "no go" list, ostensibly shutting the Russians out of some big-ticket foreign military sales to Iraq (ironically, the Russians deny wanting to sell weapons to Iraq, given their unhappiness over the U.S.-led invasion).

...

Given all this, how did ARINC set up the helicopter deal? According to contract details confirmed by the Pentagon, ARINC avoided the Rosoboronexport ban by purchasing the helicopters as commercial items from Kazan, a Russian helicopter manufacturer, thus avoiding direct work with the Russian state agency, which handles military exports. The helicopters would be converted for military use in the United Arab Emirates. That would make the deal costly, but legal.

Well, unless the other companies involved are owned by Rosoboronexport.

...

So, who is responsible for this colossal mess? Well, it could be the State Department, whose spokespeople were too afraid to even go on the record saying that working with Rosoboronexport is illegal despite rather clear language in the federal register; it could be the U.S. Army, which negotiated this deal, or it could be the Pentagon, which has oversight of these sales. Or, it could be that this is evidence, yet again, that contracting in Iraq has thoroughly destroyed the interagency process and oversight that is supposed to ensure that U.S. laws are enforced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Viktor Bout know about this?
Wouldn't want Carlyle to cut out their favorite cut-out.

Thank you for the heads-up, sabra! K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R #5
This needs many more eyes. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Laws are for little people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC