Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Government at work: tornado area can't have basements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:45 PM
Original message
Government at work: tornado area can't have basements
Rules force many in Chapman, Kan., to rebuild without basements
By DAVID KLEPPER
The Star’s Topeka correspondent


CHAPMAN, Kan. | Tell a town of Kansas tornado survivors that they can’t have a basement? Amy Bemis has a word for talk like that.

“Insane,” she says.

Like most residents of Chapman, Kan., Bemis huddled in her basement the night of June 11, when a tornado destroyed scores of homes in this town of 1,250.

Recovery efforts are in full swing, and residents say they will remake Chapman better than it was before.

But the efforts to rebuild the community now face an obstacle townspeople did not expect: Federal reconstruction rules are forcing many residents to rebuild without the basements that sheltered them through the storm.

more...


http://www.kansascity.com/703/story/724447.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Slab houses are cheaper, which is why the Feds want them rebuilt
that way. That's the way to do it in hurricane country, any way.

However, they typically have their heads up their butts when it comes to confronting rebuilding in completely different areas.

This desperately needs to be changed. Foundations/basements should be intact. People should be able to rebuild on top of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. The way the government sees it...
Edited on Tue Jul-29-08 12:50 PM by DaveTheWave
The next time a big one hits they want less survivors to collect aid and assistance. Pretty much the way American health-care helps sustain social security by denying preventive care that leads to a longer and healthier life. Have a system where people die before they can collect or where their health is so bad they won't be collecting long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. It worked pretty well for New Orleans.
Levees still aren't repaired, and I am convinced it is absolutely intentional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. That is a perfect example
And the repairs that are being made are not what was recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. What is the Kansas Congressional delegation doing about this?
Their Senators: Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback

Their Representative: 1st District - Jerry Moran


All three are Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Do you rebuild the houses to provide shelter in the event of another tornado, or do you rebuild them to limit flood damage? Surely there is a way to build a safe room above ground. I would think a flood is more likely to occur than that a future tornado would take the same path as the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Nice to see someone who actually the article. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. The Reg sounds reasonable to me
I'm sure that inclusion of a safe room is eligible for reimbursement.

Last thing we should be spending taxpayer dollars on is building structures in a floodplain that are not 'flood-proof'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's the matter with Kansas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Great book. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think the feds can prohibit them from building one of these:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. But with what money?
The problem here is that people are relying on government grants to help them rebuild, which is why the government gets to say no to basements. Basements haven't been outlawed in Kansas, and people who can afford to rebuild with basements or storm shelters will. The rest of the folks are just SOOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Heck, I'd dig me a little hole in the back yard and rig up some sort of lid.
No basements. That's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. My wonderful In-laws lived in North Kansas
(both now deceased) and more then once we went to their fully furnished and very comfortable full basement when some really funky clouds were seen on the horizon. And thats a common site in Kansas. Next thing ya know the "feds" won't allow levies on industrial canals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder if they will do what the people NOLA do? They can't have basements either because of ground
water. You dig a hole and it fills up with water. So they build their basements above ground and bury it. The house looks like it's setting on top of a hill. But it's just the dirt that surrounds the basement which is actually the first floor because it's actually above ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. What?????

What houses have you seen in Louisiana with an above ground "basement" surrounded by dirt? I'm sorry but that's one of the funniest things I've ever heard. :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Well, that's what they turned into low income apartments.
The soil washed away, knock a few holes in the walls for windows and viola! :sarcasm: (and I'm away I misspelled voila)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. And where in New Orleans would those houses on hills (buried basements) be?
I never saw such a thing down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I've only seen a few houses in NOLA with basements. I asked them how they did it.
That's what they said. The basement is actually built above ground and buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I grew up near Chapman
Can't imagine having a house without a basement. We used ours for storm shelter several times a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm certain that the Kansans Republican congressfolk will rectify this egregious travesty.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. some comments left at the article:
Sounds like the best thing to do is act like animals. Murder, develop a gang, steal, do everything but help your neighbor. That's how New Orleans gets what it wants. Being able to throw out the race card at your convenience probably doesn't hurt either.

The gummit should just flat out QUIT insuring any of these people.
If your bulding in a flood plain, thats your problem. Not mine or the gummit's.


Well, for everyone who kept Bill Clinton in office for two terms, thank his administration. These rules were passed in 1995.These are administered by a bunch of fat-bottomed beaurocrats in Washington who push paper all day, go home and waste away the rest of the night,and amble in the next day, with nary a thought to the concerns of the average person, until it's time to hold us hostage for more pay. Bah! on all of them.

We're from the government and we're here to help. LOL



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh, more compassionate conservatism, I see.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. yep.
i was struck by that as well. a hella lot of ignorance, intolerance, and hatred out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. There are NO basements here in this part of North Texas.
Despite tornadoes, the ground is not amenable to basements.

When we moved here, we saw one house with an outdoor tornado shelter -- which was collapsing because of the soil.

I asked the realtor what people did when they had a tornado. Her answer: "We try not to have them."

We had moved from Kansas, where we had not considered any house without a basement -- and where we had spent many frightened hours huddling in the basement during tornado warnings.

Oh how I miss California and its earthquakes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Fuck FEMA
I have a friend from chapman, and his families' house was badly damaged and had to be razed. They had adequate insurance but since FEMA is being douches about this, their insurance won't cover the rebuild if it includes a basement. There is virtually no risk of severe flooding there, bc the river that runs by town is essentially impossible to breach it's banks. Many many rivers in the state are at low levels and have been for years. The federal govt has no right determining local zoning and construction ordinances. Fuck off, FEMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm glad FEMA hasn't taken over CA's building codes.
I've heard it said several times today that the reason there has been a little damage is due to California's building codes and California always updating those codes.

Fuck you FEMA. What happened to letting the states decide?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. Houses built in flood plains can't rebuild with basements?
I can see the point of that, but they need to be built with some sort of safe room instead then. And have the "safe room" be funded by the gvt too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC