Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Firstread: Stevens can no longer serve on Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committees!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:12 PM
Original message
Firstread: Stevens can no longer serve on Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committees!
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/29/1231246.aspx

*** UPDATE II *** NBC's Ken Strickland adds that, per Senate GOP caucus rules, if a member is indicted, he or she can no longer serve as chairman or ranking member of a committee until the case is resolved. Upon conviction, the chair/ranking member would automatically be replaced.

Stevens is ranking member of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.


Yipee!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh perfect!
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. why do Ted Stevens and Science committee in the same sentence make my brain hurt?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe it's his Internet explanation: "a series of tubes" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. The data must be getting stuck in those damn tubes!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Science is in real trouble if Ted Stevens isn't around!
Edited on Tue Jul-29-08 02:39 PM by FSogol
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dance dance dance!
:party: :bounce: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtf80123 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. He just resigned
from this committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. LINK?
BTW, the title of the OP isn't exactly right. As the message itself says, repub rules preclude Stevens from serving as ranking member, but they don't preclude him from serving on the committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtf80123 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. C-Span
It is currently running in the scroll across the bottom of the screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. would John McCain become the new ranking memeber of the Commerce Committee?
he is the next senior member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtf80123 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Confirmed
Link

Statement from Alaska Senator Ted Stevens


I have proudly served this nation and Alaska for over 50 years. My public service began when I served in World War II. It saddens me to learn that these charges have been brought against me. I have never knowingly submitted a false disclosure form required by law as a U.S. Senator.

In accordance with Senate Republican Conference rules, I have temporarily relinquished my vice-chairmanship and ranking positions until I am absolved of these charges.

The impact of these charges on my family disturbs me greatly.

I am innocent of these charges and intend to prove that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. so he still serves on the committe, but isn't "vice chairman/ranking member"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's the Commerce/Transportation part that may be most significant
Edited on Tue Jul-29-08 04:40 PM by starroute
Since that's where the lobbyists line up for favors.

I've run into this a bit while looking into Jack Abramoff and SunCruz, and though I don't understand all the fine points, it's clear that there's considerable money involved in the regulation of the cruise ship industry. For example, here's something from 2000 about a Commerce Committee hearing on changing the laws regarding foreign-registered cruise ships. (If nothing else, seeing McCain's name as chairman and the mention of Carnival Cruise Lines, I'm reminded of that sex(?) scandal involving McCain and the female lobbyist that briefly surfaced earlier this year.)

http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/R?cp106:FLD010:@1(sr396)

UNITED STATES CRUISE VESSEL ACT

R E P O R T
of the
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
on
S. 1510

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman
TED STEVENS, Alaska
CONRAD BURNS, Montana
SLADE GORTON, Washington
TRENT LOTT, Mississippi
KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas
OLYMPIA SNOWE, Maine
JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri
BILL FRIST, Tennessee
SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan
SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas
ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina
DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii
JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia
JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts
JOHN B. BREAUX, Louisiana
RICHARD H. BRYAN, Nevada
BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota
RON WYDEN, Oregon
MAX CLELAND, Georgia

Subject to certain limited exceptions, the provisions of the law known as the Passenger Vessel Services Act (PVSA) (section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886) and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, provide that only those vessels built in the United States and continuously owned by U.S. citizens and documented in the U.S. may transport passengers in the coastwise trade of the United States (between U.S. ports). The law was enacted in a time when maritime transportation was a significant mode of both domestic and international transportation. The law was intended to prevent U.S.-based companies from facing strong competition in the domestic market from maritime nations such as Great Britain. The law did not address vacation cruising as no market existed at that time. ...

Following World War II, the nature of maritime travel changed significantly as both domestic and transoceanic flights became more common and affordable. Air travel provided new competition for passenger vessels. With dwindling passengers, some vessel operators started to package cruising more as a vacation at sea than a mode of travel. By the mid-1970's the last regularly scheduled transoceanic passenger service had ceased.

Companies had to do something with now-empty ships. Cruises to a few tropical ports slowly became popular. The first passenger ship specifically built for warm-weather cruising was introduced in 1970 by Carnival Cruise Lines. From there, the industry grew rapidly and has boomed since the mid-1980's when the first megaships were introduced to the market. ...

S. 2507, the United States Cruise Ship Tourism Act of 1998, was introduced by Senators McCain, Thurmond, Hutchison and Burns on September 22, 1998. The bill would have allowed foreign-built vessels to be reflagged as U.S. vessels and engage in domestic commerce, and permitted limited employment of foreign-flag cruise ships in the domestic commerce. S. 2507 would have allowed foreign-built cruise ships, fewer than ten years of age and at least 20,000 gross tons and with accommodations for at least 800 passengers, to be reflagged as U.S.-flag vessels to engage in foreign commerce. The bill would have limited each company that utilized the provisions of the bill to no more than three vessels, and would have waived certain design and safety standards provided that a Coast Guard-recognized classification society had approved the vessel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC