rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:08 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Do you believe that Nancy Pelosi will allow a full House vote on Contempt |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 12:09 PM by rateyes
of Congress Charges just passed in the Judiciary Committee against Karl Rove?
Choose one:
|
zanne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The most sensible poll I've seen in a long time. Kudos! nt |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thanks. Don't forget to vote. nt |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Alternate poll: Will she allow a vote on the sending of a Very Sternly-Written Letter? |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Hell, she allow that without a vote. nt |
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I predict she will, but that DUers will later assert that she didn't |
Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Be sure to start a thread when she does.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. be sure to respond.to the thread |
|
you'll be the only one, based on past experience. People like their memory holes.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. so when did meiers and bolton appear before the committee? |
|
there's one born every minute, and you're the living proof. check is in the mail.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. easy there, what's your hurry |
|
there'll be plenty of time to move the goalposts later.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. what the fuck does that even mean?! |
|
the GOAL of issuing subpoenas is to ensure that people appear before the judge, magistrate, or congressional committee. the GOAL of the subpoenas is not to appease rubes like youself whose only concern is that some idiot with a (D) appended to their name occupies a seat in congress despite doing fuckall.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. so the contempt vote will essentially be meaningless? |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It's neck and neck.... |
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
11. why would she allow one against Bolten and Miers |
|
and not one against Rove?
What's the reasoning behind this certainty that she won't allow the vote?
Is Pam Miles writing stories again?
|
pleah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Should have put HELL NO on the second choice, it would be a landslide! |
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
13. nope, but she'll write a stern chapter about it in her next book |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
14. He'll be held in contempt, just like Harriet Miers and Josh Bolten were |
|
And what happened to them? Not a damn thing. It was referred to the AG and the AG decided not to pursue it.I think he will be found in contempt, but nothing will happen.
|
Bozita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
17. "off the table" should be a third choice in this poll. |
Benhurst
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
The Republicans are so sensitive.
A vote would be hurtful and divisive.
|
DireStrike
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If she does, and they vote yes, then he will be held in contempt. IF AND IF AND IF AND IF... for NOTHING.
I feel like I'm wasting time even complaining about it. Even thinking about it!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message |