I know supposedly nobody reads them anymore, but I do. At least Weds & Sunday I do. Anyway, I was irritated enough last Sunday to write about a letter saying that the Democrat's platform should be closer to the pro-life beliefs of early suffragists.
http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/stories/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1219480316114810.xml&coll=2I'm reading a lot right now about early suffragists so I wrote back. Was in the paper & they put the Woodhull quote in large letters to the side. Sorry, I'm just excited because the letter is from a "Feminist for Life" & guess who else is?
My letter:
Democrats' stance on abortion in line with suffragists -- letter to the editor
Sunday, August 31, 2008
I must respectfully disagree with the assertion by Marilyn Kopp that early suffragists were pro-life ("Early suffragettes opposed abortion," Aug. 24). The Democratic platform is actually right in line with the views of early suffragists, if you look beyond a couple of quotes.
At that time in history, being against abortion meant being an advocate of women's reproductive freedom. This is in stark contrast to today's pro-life movement, which is against abortion while also being against education and access to birth control, which would prevent many abortions.
Victoria Woodhull's views were distorted by the quote used. She thought abortion was terrible, but her opinion was, "Abortion is only a symptom of a more deep-seated disorder of the social state. It cannot be put down by law."
This is an opinion shared by many in the pro-choice community. Elizabeth Cady Stanton was against abortion as well but was an advocate of birth control and education to combat it. "There must be a remedy even for such a crying evil as this," she wrote. "But where shall it be found, at least where begin, if not in the complete enfranchisement and elevation of women?"
Melissa M. Piccirilli
Gates Mills
http://www.cleveland.com/letters/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/opinion/12200854965750.xml&coll=2