Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin thinks Pledge written by Founding Fathers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:12 AM
Original message
Palin thinks Pledge written by Founding Fathers
Palin thinks Pledge written by Founding Fathers Hotlist
by JLFinch - Aug 31, 2008 - http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/31/174153/834/246/581480


Good lord, this woman is a female George Bush.

Here is Palin's response to a candidate questionnaire for the Alaska 2006 gubernatorial race:

11. Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance

.....................

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. What an idiot.
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Perfectly said. Cannot add anything to that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Now we have to have 200 threads on how idiots are unfairly attacked.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, to be fair, this is really is an insult to idiots.. :D
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. But, it is an everyday thing for a MORAN.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. freaking Knights of Columbus!!!!!!!
The Knights of Columbus in New York City felt that the pledge was incomplete without any reference to a deity. Appealing to the authority of Abraham Lincoln, the Knights felt that the words "under God" which were from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address were most appropriate to add to the Pledge. In New York City on April 22, 1951, the Board of Directors of the Knights of Columbus adopted a resolution to amend their recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at the opening of each of the meetings of the 800 Fourth Degree Assemblies of the Knights of Columbus by addition of the words "under God" after the words "one nation." In the following two years, the idea spread throughout Knights of Columbus organizations nationwide. On August 21, 1952, the Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus at its annual meeting adopted a resolution urging that the change be made universal and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President (as Presiding Officer of the Senate) and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The National Fraternal Congress meeting in Boston on September 24, 1952, adopted a similar resolution upon the recommendation of its President, Supreme Knight Luke E. Hart. Several State Fraternal Congresses acted likewise almost immediately thereafter. This campaign led to several official attempts to prompt Congress to adopt the Knights of Columbus’ policy for the entire nation. These attempts failed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance#Addition_of_the_words_.22under_God.22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Thank you for the information.
I don't know much about history, but I DID know that the pledge came from the 1950s. It's really awful that she doesn't know that and she's trying to be vice president.

:hide: :( :cry:


buffy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. It actually came from 1892 and was modified most recently in the 1950s
The wikipedia link has it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Opps, sorry about that, but
still 1892... She is still so wrong.

buffy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poiuytsister Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Palin and CO will probably have the Wiki site scrubbed by now
Just like she cleaned her own up to delete anything scandalous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. I found a missing WA Post article today!
Showing she wasn't lukewarm against the Bridge to Nowhere until it was obvious it was going nowhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. i just read that Bellamy wanted to add "equality and fraternity" but didn't
because it would be seen as controversial by many who opposed rights for blacks and women.

but this is an example of the problem i have with people. most who want to make a big issue about the need to recite the pledge probably have no knowledge about it's history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh My
It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Some people just say stuff without thinking about factuality!
Because it will get them elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. and how many stars were on the original flag, sweetie? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. BENJAMIN WAS A REPUBLICAN AND FOUNDED THE FRANKLIN MINT
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. UNDER GOD WAS ADDED BY THE REPUBICANS AS ANTI COMMIE
IN 1954
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. Actually Louis Charles Rabaut (D - Michigan) got that ball rolling in 1953. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Conservative cartoon American history
That's like the person I heard say that we fought the American Revolution to defend the Constitution.

Uuuuhh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Puppy killer Palin---wolf puppies that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. So help me if she gets elected to any federal office
my head will explode. I'm serious. And it won't be pretty. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadicalTexan Donating Member (607 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. This is what my 58-year-old mother keeps saying
She's been yelling at me over the phone since Friday.

I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. I could understand it if McSame had called HER a c*nt
Or, more specifically, a stupid c*nt. But I suppose it applies to his wife, too. Not big on selecting intelligent women, is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. stunning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. Damn.
It's really mind-boggling that she was elected mayor anywhere in this country, or on Earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Wow. Just Wow.
That's appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. Lack of historical knowledge is just red meat for the Repug base
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 03:14 AM by last_texas_dem
Think about it. They ate up Chimpy's idiocy and gaffes and found them refreshing and endearing. Palin is on their side on the right-wing issues- and that's what matters. The more she reveals herself to not be too into that thar book larnin', the more strongly the wingnut base will root for her. Recent history proves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. She's adorable!
Speaks in complete sentences just like a grown up girl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
22. Her answer to #3 is interesting ...
3. Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?
JB: We should not exclude abstinence-until-marriage education programs.
SP: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.


So, when she got pregnant and eloped she can claim she wasn't taught "abstinence-until-marriage".

Or, when her daughter suddenly appeared with a ring on her finger at the Dayton McCain rally (where he said the GOP picked her to be his running mate) it's okay for her to have sex.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuckYouAROCK Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
24. What an idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. What a total idiot
Even non-Americans with any interest in history know that the Pledge was written long after the Founding Fathers.

In any case, I suspect she'd rather not have to say the older version about 'one nation indivisible' as she apparently gave some support to the Alaska Independence Party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Dose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. I wonder if the founding fathers enjoyed the Chicago World's Fair? Someone should ask them. They are
immortal, right? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Only the four on Mt. Rushmore!! LOL
I was surprised they had glasses back then. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
32. K&R for folks like me who missed this earlier
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
33. The Pledge of Allegiance wasn't written by a conservative
It was written by a self-described Christian socialist in the 19th century.

http://history.vineyard.net/pledge.htm

Excerpt:

Francis Bellamy (1855 - 1931), a Baptist minister, wrote the original Pledge in August 1892. He was a Christian Socialist. In his Pledge, he is expressing the ideas of his first cousin, Edward Bellamy, author of the American socialist utopian novels, Looking Backward (1888) and Equality (1897).

Francis Bellamy in his sermons and lectures and Edward Bellamy in his novels and articles described in detail how the middle class could create a planned economy with political, social and economic equality for all. The government would run a peace time economy similar to our present military industrial complex.

The Pledge was published in the September 8th issue of The Youth's Companion, the leading family magazine and the Reader's Digest of its day. Its owner and editor, Daniel Ford, had hired Francis in 1891 as his assistant when Francis was pressured into leaving his baptist church in Boston because of his socialist sermons. As a member of his congregation, Ford had enjoyed Francis's sermons. Ford later founded the liberal and often controversial Ford Hall Forum, located in downtown Boston.


Originally, the words "under God" weren't put in until the Cold War.

The Pledge of Allegiance was first recited in 1892, the year it was first written. The author was Francis Bellamy, a Baptist minister from New York. Bellamy was also a chairman of a committee of state superintendents of education in the National Education Association.
Public schools all around the country were preparing a celebration in honor of the 400th anniversary of Columbus Day. Bellamy wanted a special celebration, and he wanted to center it around a flag-raising ceremony and salute. With this in mind, he wrote his pledge:

"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

Notice the words "my flag." They stayed this way in the Pledge until 1924, when a National Flag Conference announced that the words "my flag" would be changed to "the flag of the United States of America."

"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

The Pledge stayed this way until 1954, when Congress added the words "under God." This was the final change, giving the Pledge its current wording:

"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."


http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/articles/ushistory/pledgeofallegiancehistory.htm

I didn't know the Founding Fathers lived until 1954! :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
34. They also think they put it on our money as well.
None of that crap happened until the Red Scare bullshit of the 20th century.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yes people, she really is that fucking stupid.
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 10:55 AM by dkofos
gwb with tits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
37. She's in good company.
It wasn't all that long ago that Karen Hughes explained to a group of dignitaries (I think she was in the Middle East at the time) that "...one nation under God" is in our Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC