Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:18 AM
Original message |
Was bush experienced or qualified enough to be the president? |
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |
1. your tense is wrong - "IS bush experienced or qualified . . . ." |
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is... |
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. or what the meaning of "was" was . . . . |
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message |
Squatch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Constitutionaly, he was qualified |
|
Although events would prove that he lacked certain critical required qualities not specified by the Constitution.
|
ananda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Bush is the poster boy for the consequences of inexperience and simplistic extremist views.
If the electorate took that as a caution, anyone who followed Bush would be toast; and anyone without experience and gravitas would also be unelectable.
In the current spate of candidates, we have both.
That tells you how flawed the American electoral process is, and the way the country has been divided against itself so that really good candidates simply cannot get nominated.
|
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I believe bush & reagan before him have proven that WE DON'T NEED presidents. |
|
We've been operating WITHOUT a president for 8 years now.
|
Tammie
(361 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |
6. He wasn't and he isn't |
|
And look where we're at now.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
|
and he still isn't. Cheney is the main factor.
|
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I think experience is overrated... |
|
however, he sure as fuck wasn't qualified.
Sid
|
Tindalos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
and look where that's gotten us.
|
Ganja Ninja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
11. He had the experience and qualification. |
|
He was simply unfit for the presidency. He was a moron. He lacked the temperament and intelligence to be president. Anybody else with his resume (leaving out all the bad grades and personal failures) would have been considered qualified as a former governor of a large state.
|
radfringe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |
12. no and it shows.... n/t |
JBoris
(675 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message |
14. He had "more executive experience than Obama and Biden combined"... just like Palin nt |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 08:46 AM by JBoris
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Nixon and Bush the Elder were probably the most qualified and experienced |
|
presidents of the latter half of the 20th century.
Didn't end up working out too well.
|
lpbk2713
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |
16. He was never qualified to run a lemonade stand. |
|
Everything he ever was involved with prior to the Y2K selection turned to chit. And since that time it has just been a steady case of history repeating itself. Just like someone once described him ... "Bush was born on third base and he's convinced he hit a triple".
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
dkofos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
19. No But they stole the election for him anyway. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |