Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm sick to death of the implication that all liberal women would abort a fetus with Down syndrome

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:16 AM
Original message
I'm sick to death of the implication that all liberal women would abort a fetus with Down syndrome
I wish they'd stop implying that prochoice means that we're all having abortions just for the hell of it. I'm 100% prochoice but I wouldn't abort a fetus just because it had Down syndrome and I don't think I'm alone in holding that position. The assumption that we would all abort a Down's baby holds an ugly insinuation that disabled babies have no value by virtue of their disability. What utter bullshit. The republican party is just proving the theory that they're really only pro-fetus and don't give a god-damned once that fetus is born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fulllib Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Choice
Choice is good enough for Palin's daughter, but not for the rest of us.

I agree. The implication that disabled babies are being aborted left and right is annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. depends on how much money you have to care for the being
what kind of life can you give the child - they have lots of money - so the money part is easier

pro-life and pro-war are oxymoron's - you cannot be both and that is what republics are they like killing other people's children especially in other countries.

there are many people who would not abort a child even if they are pro-choice - they just don't want someone else telling them they can have or not have a baby - china says they can't have

the wing nuts and the churches need more followers so they don't want them to abort them

taking care of a 'healthy normal' child is hard - add on other factors -

They just won't have time to govern because their family will take up their time or maybe their family did not take up their time and that is why they have the problems they do

They are pretty dysfunctional but most of GOP are dysfunctional and it has worked for them - they are rich - that works for them

Until we walk in those shoes and have to make that decision, I don't think any of knows what we would chose but at least give us that choice - unless they are willing to support a womens child they have no right to say she has to have it -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, come on now, they're generally bigger children - we'd EAT 'em!
to do otherwise would be just to - wasteful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Go point
logical and true.

This ignorance and stereotyping of "liberals" is just a way to focus on the left and not the abysmal record of the Bush administration. I don't know anyone who would have an abortion for that reason alone.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have always said that once the baby leaves the womb, the repukes could not care less about it.
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 01:30 AM by BrklynLiberal
It verifies the idea that they are truly interested only in control of women, and not preserving life.

Why don't they support the health care, education, food and clothing aid that these children need?

Hypocrite: If you looked it up in the dictionary, there would be a picture of a repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. I've said the same in two other threads. I know LOTS of progressive women,
but can't imagine any of us choosing to end a pregnancy because of Down syndrome. This reflects on them, not us. They're the ones who see Down's as so horrible that they consider it heroic to actually have the child. This means, of course, that if they didn't think they'd end up in hell, they would terminate such a pregnancy.

Hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Why do you think older women get tested?
I fail to understand as to why you can't imagine a woman aborting Downs syndrome child.
Those tests are there for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well. maybe because there are two down children in my congregation.
I serve a progressive, pro-choice congregation, but Down's is just not that big a deal. The children go to school, and function rather well. They need more care and supervision than average kids, but not so much that it can't be dealt with. We had a Down's adult serve as liturgist Sunday. He did fine--always does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. so the parents can be mentally prepared ahead of time
and it doesn't come as a complete surprise when the child is born?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Is that why 90 % of the women who are given the diagnosis
abort the fetus? Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
32. Not always to abort. Often to prepare
Being ready for something like that before the birth can be hugely helpful.

Again, you cannot make gross generalizations with an issue like that - they simply do not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. 90 % of fetuses with Down syndrome are aborted-that's not
mass enough for ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. if it really is 90% then it's not just liberal women having the abortions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Most liberal women that I know get their tubes tied when they get into
their forties or get their husbands to have vasectomies because the chances of having a special needs baby increases and quite honestly they are at an age when they want to be with their grandchildren, not any new babies of their own. It seems like the responsible thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. It's what I did
Effective birth control allowed me to make it to age 42 without ever having an unplanned pregnancy and I intend to see that my daughters have the exact same right. And if their birth control should fail, I'll make sure they have the right to an abortion if that is what they choose to do. Proper sex education and access to birth control is the best way to reduce abortions and I sometimes wonder if the right wing deliberately opposes that just so they can continue to use abortion as a means of political manipulation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I would have to agree.
A 44 year old woman with 4 children and pregnant with Downs syndrome child. Many women would abort in a situation like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I think it will be pizza time
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 01:55 AM by Raine
soon, what do you want on it? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Meh. They're still here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Funny ... no mention of such a poll on the web.
You confabulating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Liberals? 90 percent of ALL unborn children diagnosed with Downs
syndrome are now aborted. Where do you get the Liberals angle?

(snip)

The 5,500 children born with Down syndrome each year in the United States suffer from mild to moderate mental retardation, are at high risk for congenital heart defects and a variety of other medical problems, and have an average life expectancy of 49. As adults, some hold jobs, but many have difficulty living independently.

“There are many couples who do not want to have a baby with Down syndrome,” said Deborah A. Driscoll, chief of the obstetrics department at the University of Pennsylvania and a lead author of the new recommendation from the obstetricians’ group. “They don’t have the resources, don’t have the emotional stamina, don’t have the family support. We are recommending this testing be offered so that parents have a choice.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/09/us/09down.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. And that's the beauty of choice
and where the republicans constantly try to manipulate it to imply that pro-choice means that we're having abortions just for fun. I don't think anyone wants to be in a position where they have to make that choice and that's why it's so important that we get rid of the bullshit abstinence only education and teach the facts about preventing pregnancy through effective birth control. We'll still need to have the legal right to obtain an abortion because accidents will always happen but the more accidents we can prevent the better off everyone is.

Teaching kids about birth control = telling them to have sex is bullshit the the same as teaching them to wear a seat belt = telling them to go have a car accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
40. That Person Go the Liberal Angle from the Same Propaganda
that claims Obama is a Muslim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Presumably they would just want the same choice Palin had....
As is typical of them, "Freedom for me, not for thee" seems to be the maxim they live by.


AND LEAVE TRIG ALONE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norepubsin08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. I know I am going to get beat up here but...
if you really want to be environmentally correct, then have no more than 2 children any thing beyond that and you're an eco terrorist as far as I am concerned...on the third preggo-ABORT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. At least you predicted correctly. Your comment is idiotic.
And this comes from someone who has the magical number of 2 children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. They never pass up a chance to call all liberals baby killers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. hey love your user name!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. Choice means just that.
The whole point is to give the woman the information she needs to decide what she wants to do. Until this country has universal, cradle to grave health care, the idea that mothers should have to birth children with serious health problems is really obnoxious. You'd think they'd at least have such health care if they wanted to encourage more births and fewer abortions.

Yeah, it's a moral dilemma, but it's the woman's moral dilemma, and she goes with what she thinks is best for her in her life at that moment. Who is to say it is wrong, whatever it is?

Liberal women are more moral than conservative women, and the daughters of conservatives likely have more abortions than those daughters of liberals. They have more to hide and more to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
25. I wouldn't do it either. But that doesn't mean no one should.
My neighbors have a daughter with Down Syndrome and she is a lovely young lady, holds an office job, loves reading science fiction. But it takes a lot of love and attention and work to make sure kids with this condition have decent lives. If you don't have it in you, you shouldn't have one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. I am against abortion for myself.
There are millions of liberal woman like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. Good post. They make us sound like a bunch of whack jobs
trying to get pregnant for the sole purpose of having an abortion. The issue is choice. Politicians need to keep their noses out of our uteri.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
29. I am an 'older' mom and I never even did the Down screening tests they recommended.
We weren't going to abort under any circumstance, so we didn't see the point in doing the screening. But that was my choice. I wouldn't deny another woman her own choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladyVet Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
30. this drives me crazy, too
I was 36 1/2 when my third son was born. I discussed the possibility of birth defects with my doctor, and decided to do an ultrasound before any other testing. No signs of Down Syndrome showed, so I didn't do the other tests. My son is 14, above average mentally, and a joy to my family (including his two much older brothers).

I would not have aborted in any case, but I'm glad I had that option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. They can't argue with us when the issue is properly framed: as choice.
So they have reframed it as "pro-abortion".

I agree with you - in fact, I didn't have an amnio with my 2nd, though my age would have indicated it. Because, personally, I would not have aborted. But so what? That would have been MY choice, that's all.

It's just a shame that people like Palin think she's entitled to HER choice, but other women are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
33. 91-93% of Down's pregnancies are aborted
Obviously most women choose to terminate rather than carry the child to term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. Do you have a source for that statistic? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. I just grabbed it from wikipedia
So take that with the requisite slabs of salt. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome#Ethical_issues>

However, I have heard it from other sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
34. We're also
all atheists, all marxists, want high taxes, high defecits,and won't be happy until we turn all America's children gay. At least that's what the radio tells me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'm pro-choice and had a child at 41.
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 08:39 AM by OnionPatch
There was never a question in my mind as to whether or not I would abort in the case of Down's. If it happened, it happened, and I was fully prepared to deal with being the parent of a Down's child. But I would never force that decision on someone else. That's the whole thing about Republicans--They love to force their beliefs on everyone else, all the while screaming "Freedom! Freedom!" They don't know the meaning of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. only pro-choicers make moral decisions
those who yield their decision making powers to authority, those who believe there is not a choice to be made, or that god made it for them, are not making moral decisions. they are simply surrendering to authority.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. Totally agree. It's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
41. Anti-Choicers are Liars with a Political Agenda
if they can smear, they will with no facts to back them up whatsoever...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
43. Exactly!
K (well it doesn't really need the kick but) and R!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC