Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

****SARAH PALIN'S EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIR****

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jpertello Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:27 AM
Original message
****SARAH PALIN'S EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIR****
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 09:27 AM by jpertello
Man Named in Alleged Sarah Palin Affair


Submitted by Alejandro Botticelli on Fri, 09/05/2008 - 21:55.

The John McCain camp has threatened legal action against the National Enquirer in recent days for reporting that his running mate, Sarah Palin, had an affair while married to her husband, Todd.

The Enquirer's own anonymous source claims: "Todd discovered the affair and quickly dissolved his friendship and business associations with the guy. Many people in Alaska are talking about the rumour and say Todd swept it under the rug."

The man at the center of the campaign, according to Alaskan Abroad, the blog of an Alaskan journalist, reports that the allegation refers to the time when Palin became mayor of Wasilla in the mid-1990s.

Palin's husband Todd owned a snowmobile dealership with his business partner Brad Hanson. Apparently Hanson, who was also married, and Sarah got on famously; Alaskan Abroad's sources say the two were "flirtatious but never consummated the relationship".

"When Todd found out, he reportedly dissolved the partnership and sold the dealership. Hanson is now a member of the Palmer City Council."

Brad Hanson is currently a city council member in Palmer, Alaska.

The McCain campaign has gone on record as saying the "affair story" is nothing more than a "vicious lie".

"The smearing of the Palin family must end. The allegations contained on the cover of the National Enquirer insinuating that Governor Palin had an extramarital affair are categorically false. It is a vicious lie," said McCain Chief Strategiest, Steve Schmidt.

"The efforts of the media and tabloids to destroy this fine and accomplished public servant are a disgrace. The American people will reject it."

The National Enquirer has gained some respect in recent weeks as the media outlet which broke another "extra marital affair" story. This one proved to be true and later confirmed by the target of the story, former Presidential candidate John Edwards.

Palin is at the center of another major scandal that could prove far more damaging. She herself has hired an attorney to try and diffuse the matter aptly titled "Trooper Gate".

An investigation is under way into whether Palin used her office to push for her ex-brother-in-law's firing from the Alaska State Police and whether she ultimately fired Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan for refusing to sack him.

Mike Wooten was the state trooper and ex-brother-in-law of Palin's. The Alaska Governor has denied any wrongdoing, saying her decision to fire Monegan involved budgetary concerns and moving the department in a new direction. Palin has acknowledged that aides and members of her family repeatedly discussed Wooten with Monegan or members of his department, but she said at no time did she or anyone else acting at her request use her office to press for Wooten's firing.

Before becoming governor, Palin wrote to state investigators in 2005, issuing a series of allegations against Wooten.

In 2006, state investigators found Wooten guilty of "a significant pattern of judgment failures," including using a Taser on his 10-year-old stepson and drinking beer while operating a state trooper vehicle. Wooten was suspended for 10 days as "a last chance to take corrective action."

Another firestorm involves Palin's decision to fly from Texas to Alaska, nearly nine hours, while 8 months pregnant after her water had apparently broke.

This controversy has Gambling911.com readers engaging in a heated discussion over the Republican Vice Presidential nominee‘s judgment.

http://www.gambling911.com/politics/man-named-alleged-sarah-palin-affair-090508.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whos your Baby's Daddy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Will Sarah, as Governor, make Alaska another "Hoosier State"?
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. How are Alaska and Indiana similar? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. ((sigh)) "Hoosier" ... "Who's your..."
The humor is lost when explanations are needed. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Perhaps when explanations are needed there was no humor.
Edited on Sun Sep-07-08 12:16 PM by usnret88
edited to add "sigh"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. they asked the McCain campaign who from obama's campaign
smeared palin. They cited pat buchanan. They could not lay one name down. Lying + breathing = Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. so the "affair" was a "flirtatious" relationship that was never consummated?
Color me very unimpressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It is a laughable assertion, actually.
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 09:46 AM by Lex
Who would believe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It was 'flirtatious' enough that Todd broke off contact.
Where there's smoke there's fire.

I'll patiently await any more news on this to unfold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. dupe
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 09:54 AM by GoesTo11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. "I did not consummate the affair with that man, Brad Hanson"
The article says they didn't consummate the affair. Maybe it's based on the same kind of parsing that Bill Clinton famously used about not having sexual relations.

By the way, the boyfriend is a high school hockey coach. Adds mystery to the Hockey Mom label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Depends on the fundie definition of "consumate" - which excludes oral sex
A friend's teenage son got involved with a fundie hottie he met through work. I had no idea how much sexual activity goes on at church "camps"! Oh, those su-u-u-u-u-umer nights!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. And this one time, at Church Camp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Maybe so, but if the NE's own "source" can't do better than that
you may be waiting a while for more concrete "evidence". Not saying more won't come out. Just saying that there is much to go on now and calling it an affair based on what even the source acknowledges seems like a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth_ Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Penetration fail?
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 09:42 AM by kurth_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. if there was that much why would the source (who obviously is not trying to help Palin)
parse words?

Maybe sometimes flirtation means flirtation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. No shit. Why do we keep coming up with this garbage?
We need to hammer on ethics and issues and things that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nothing will surprise me about Sarah Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Business partners attempt to seal divorce papers Denied.
From: http://www.pamshouseblend.com/

The latest bit of news about this is that Todd Palin's former business partner filed an emergency appeal to have his divorce records sealed. Oops -- it looks like the appeal was denied.

Petition to seal divorce papers: http://www.courtrecords.alaska.gov/pa/pa.urd/pamw2000.docket_lst?68762762

Note that the motion was denied on 9/4/08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. If you have nothing to hide......
So lets see what is in the divorce papers before we make judgement on the validity of the story.

BECAUSE WHERE THERE IS SMOKE......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Apparently, the reason he wanted the sealed was to protect himself
from reporters getting his personal information.

Smoking Gun has a copy of the petition.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0905083palin1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Good. Hope we see what's in there soon.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. And that's not even the same business partner.
The denied request came from Scott Richter.

Looks like we're gonna need a wall-size dry eraser board to keep track of all of Sarah's secrets. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. The Richter divorce papers would relate to a different scandal, not the alleged affair
Scott Richter (a friend of Todd Palin's) was in a divorce proceeding with his wife, Debbie. Debbie began seeing John Bitney, who was Governor Palin's legislative liaison. Bitney was thereupon fired. The allegation is that Scott Richter told Todd Palin about his unhappiness with Bitney, and Todd communicated this to Sarah Palin, costing Bitney his job. The Richter divorce papers might include allegations from Scott Richter about his wife's relationship with Bitney, which would provide part of the underpinning for another Palin scandal -- that a capable public servant was dismissed for reasons of petty personal vindictiveness.

I'm extremely dubious about the charge that Sarah Palin had an affair. This charge about Bitney, though, seems quite credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Finally, a post on this that makes some sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. That's a DIFFERENT Man!!!!!!! That man is Scott Richter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. ANOTHER FALSE RUMOR to distract from the issues and to
discredit the sites that spread the false rumors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Nothing to see here folks. This Palin Affair angle is a Dead-End
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. But it was perfectly fine for the NE to secretly follow Edwards to a hotel
Edited on Sat Sep-06-08 10:58 AM by Gman
take pictures and then publish a scandalous story. No problem there at all. At least Edwards was big enough to hold a PRESS CONFERENCE (something Palin won't do) to discuss the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
18.  Was it perfectly fine for the NE to secretly follow Edwards?
I imagine that there is more than one view of that here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. From the perspective of those threatening the NE with a lawsuit of Palin's affair
it was perfectly fine to follow Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Could that be because the Edwards affair actually happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I think they had an advance tip from his girl friend & didn't have to follow him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. A "flirtation"?? No affair. Geese......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. Nothing to see here folks. This Palin Affair angle is a Dead-End
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. So let the McCain campaign sue. That will be good press for them.
:rofl: They seem to be in "anything for the spotlight" mode after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
34. Another real yawner of a non-story
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
36. the "affair" story and the trig is bristol's bullshit 'story' are BOTH worthless directions to take-
there are PLENTY of FACTUAL items about her policy decisions that can gain MUCH BETTER traction than trying to smear her and/or her family on a personal level. that kind of stuff can EASILY backfire BIG-TIME. which is exactly as kkkarl rove is planning it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC