Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Lies That Keep on Giving

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 08:35 PM
Original message
The Lies That Keep on Giving
from the American Prospect:



THE LIES THAT KEEP ON GIVING.

Reporters continue to timidly equivocate over the McCain campaign's dishonesty about Sarah Palin's record. Two lies in particular stand out because they are central to the "fellow maverick" rationale for Palin's candidacy: her purported opposition to "The Bridge to Nowhere" and the fabrication that she "sold the governor's jet on eBay."

A week ago, the Washington Post's Michael Dobbs purported to "fact check" Palin's claim regarding "The Bridge To Nowhere." He begins with this exact quote:

told Congress, 'Thanks, but no thanks,' on that bridge to nowhere."


Dobbs then concludes that the statement is "half-true" because "Palin did make the final call to kill plans for the bridge, but by the time she did it was no longer a politically viable project." Well that's not the claim Palin made. Palin claimed she "told Congress 'Thanks, but no thanks,' on that bridge to nowhere," a far more specific assertion than simply having "killed the bridge." But the important point of the story, as Bob Somerby points out, is that Palin told Congress nothing. Nada. Zip. Bubkus. ZERO. Palin didn't tell Congress anything at all, and in no sense is the statement "I told Congress thanks but no thanks" even remotely true -- it's not half true, it's just completely false.

In "fact-checking" Palin's claim, Dobbs forgets to actually evaluate the veracity of the original statement, divining an interpretation of what Palin meant rather than what she actually said. This is generally, how "fact-checking" this claim has been approached. By not challenging what Somerby points out is the most compelling part of the story, they allow the lie to continue being repeated. The media has shown such a reluctance to identify this whopper as a lie that the McCain campaign has cut a commercial touting this massive fabrication as part of Palin's "maverick" credentials.
This has continued with other demonstrably false claims made by the McCain campaign, most notably that Palin "sold the governor's jet on eBay." Palin herself has taken pains to avoid saying she "sold" the plane, but these subtleties escape her running mate. She put it up on eBay, it didn't sell, and they had to sell it at a loss (the dominant theme of Palin's lies is that every single one seems to cost taxpayers millions). Nevertheless, the McCain campaign has continued to repeat the lie. On Friday, when CNN's Campbell Brown confronted Bay Buchanan with the McCain campaign's dishonesty, Buchanan pitched a fit. But when Brown asked for Paul Begala's opinion, Begala, allegedly a liberal, said this (emphasis mine):

BEGALA: No, I will say, it's actually something Bay and I agree on. We're both press bashers irrespective of what the campaigns want. I think the corporate media has fallen in love with this woman and has given her rock star status and need to give her a much thorough review of her record. In defense of governor Palin, I think that the eBay thing with the plane is within the acceptable bounds of hyperbole.


Begala thinks outright lies are within "acceptable bounds of hyperbole" and that Palin's record should be "reviewed" but not in a manner that challenges her most outrageous claims.

The press shouldn't require any motivation to confront politicians on bogus claims. But is it any surprise that they fail to do so when the so-called opposition is willing to give them a pass rather than hammering them on their flagrant dishonesty?

--A. Serwer

Posted by Adam Serwer on September 8, 2008 2:05 PM


http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=09&year=2008&base_name=the_lie_that_keeps_on_giving



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. She figures she can just lie about any old shit & won't matter.
She thinks her shit smells sweet too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. The McCain campaign is lying about their candidates' records
Today, they're out with a new ad that pushes blatant lies to dress up these party-line politicians as agents of change.

Let's set the record straight:

Palin was a supporter of the infamous Bridge to Nowhere -- the symbol of the Republican culture of corruption -- only turning her back on it after the project's bloated pork-barrel waste was exposed.

In just six years, John McCain has voted for nearly $150 billion in earmarks -- just like the Bridge to Nowhere.

Watch our hard-hitting response ad and share it with everyone you know.

The McCain campaign will say or do anything to sound like "mavericks" or reformers -- but the record shows that their ticket is in lockstep with George Bush and his dead-end policies.

But a little straight talk cuts easily through these lies.

While the ad trumps up the pair's reformer credentials, McCain and Palin are defending the very things they claim to fight against. How can they be trusted to change the same system they've exploited?

Barack Obama and Joe Biden understand the change we need in Washington.

Watch the ad and spread the truth to stop the McCain campaign's lies right now:

http://my.barackobama.com/nomavericks

Keep fighting the good fight,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC