Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rendell: If I Was Palin You'd Be Calling For My Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:51 AM
Original message
Rendell: If I Was Palin You'd Be Calling For My Impeachment
Huffington Post - Sam Stein



Gov. Ed Rendell decried a double standard in the treatment of Sarah Palin on Monday, saying that if it was he who was at the center of the "troopergate" investigation, the press would be calling for his head.

"She a reformer," said the Pennsylvania Democrat. "And yet she is being investigated on the charge that she used her power as governor to fire someone who was going through a messy divorce with a relative of hers. Could you imagine if I was doing the same thing in Pennsylvania? You would be calling for my impeachment."

The remarks came at the end of a long list of criticisms that Rendell, one of the foremost supporters of Sen. Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary, launched against the Republican vice presidential nominee. Ignoring the directive of the Obama campaign to focus attentions on McCain, Rendell called out Palin on everything from ethics to earmarks.

" has tried to again obscure the facts about Gov. Palin. 'She is a reformer and against earmarks.' No she isn't, when she was mayor of that town she hired a lobbyist to get earmarks... 'She was against the bridge to nowhere.' No she wasn't. She was for the bridge to nowhere first... She is a budget balancer. But she left the town in greater debt then when she became mayor, so she is not a budget balancer."

"I like her," Rendell concluded. "She is a good person, she has tremendous potential but in no way shape or form is she ready to be president of the United States."

The Rendell call, organized to preempt a McCain appearance in Pennsylvania, was ostensibly on the topic of how the Arizona Republican has engaged in dirty politics when it came to discussing Obama's tax record. And on this issue, Rendell was again in vintage outspoken form.

"First of all, let me say it should be embarrassing for the Republican ticket that Rick Davis, Sen. McCain's campaign manager, said 'this election is not about issues.' Good lord, with all the challenges facing America it has to be about issues...They don't want to talk about issues because when the truth comes out about issues the American people will favor Sen. Obama tremendously."

The Republicans, he added, "would make the all time all-star team for spiders the way they can spin."

But most questions, as has been the case since the Palin announcement, were focused on the Alaska governor.

Would she siphon of Clinton supporters in Pennsylvania? No, said Rendell, who expected Obama to receive somewhere along the lines of "95,96, or 97 percent of the vote."

Was she qualified to serve as VP? Absolutely not, he bemoaned.

The McCain camp argues that, "Governor Palin, because of her executive experience as a mayor of a small 9,000 person town and governor of Alaska for 20 months, has that experience. Well, I refer you to a McCain camp document they put out when Gov. Kaine was considered to be vice president. They attacked his experience and derided Richmond because it was the 105th largest city ... I think Gov. Palin was mayor of the 50,000th city in the America... It was fair game to say Gov. Kaine was not qualified because of his credentials. If they are going to be consistent then they believe that Gov. Palin is unqualified to be vice president."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go get 'em, Ed! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nice! More of this please..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. If they are going to be consistent then they believe that Gov. Palin is unqualified to be VP
Well, Ed, the GOPiggies are nothing if not inconsistent.

Remember, It's Okay As Long As Your A Republican (IOALAYAR)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. More Governors Should Do The Same Thing...
Bravo, Ed...this guy knows the role of the surrogate...especially in the 24/7 cable era...and he's got the unique perch of serving as a governor...and one of a far larger state. Damn right...Eliot Spitzer got chased from office for far less that Grandma Barracuda. But, then, we don't want to get into the sex or "sexist" thing.

I'd love to see a female governor come out and really put the "wood" to the "hockey mom"...like a Janet Napolitano who can attack without being called "sexist".

I see some "Sarah" fatigue coming soon...especially in the corporate media...who got jerked around in "Palinpaloozah"...as the novelty of Granmda starts wearing very thin. The problem with the "deference" campaign is that without Palin herself coming out to defend her record, the questions can become statements of "fact"...the job of Democrat surrogates (not the candidates) is to keep putting those questions out there and demand she answer...and if not, then push the media to either get the answers or help them with "the answers". Two can play at this spin game.

Ed just showed how it can and should be done...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC