SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 05:43 PM
Original message |
Maybe it's time to move the refineries to South Dakota |
|
or Nebraska or West Virginia.. It seems to me that it may just be too expensive to continue to have these things in harm's way..
|
AldebTX
(739 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Most are near ports....we've got to import that oil don't ya know.
|
dbonds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They are there because that is where all the offshore rigs are. |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 05:49 PM by dbonds
If you move them too far way then gasoline goes up because of shipping prices of the crude to the refinery. We might need to build a pipeline from that area to maybe somewhere more inland though.
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Ratface Cornyn just said the damages could be 100BILLION |
|
and they could be offline for 9 months.. surely it would be cheaper to ship it up the mississippi and then truck it...or build the refineries more inland..even if it means land or river transport....Rebuilding the infrastructure every year seems like a lose-lose to me:shrug:
|
dbonds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I agree. Wouldn't have to go too far inland, N LA area, or NE texas. |
|
We could build a pipeline to reduce the transport cost.
|
nebenaube
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I voted earlier for Nevada |
|
West Virginia is just to green still.
|
Wiley50
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
6. No Oil Company In US Has Applied For Permit To Build A New Refinery In 35 Years n/t |
|
They are and have been aware of Peak Oil and the need to transition from hydrocarbon fuel for decades
and have not wanted to invest money in new infrastructure when it won't operate long enough to turn a profit.
That's why they are fighting the world for the last reserves these days and delaying the transition unti
they capitalize as much as possible. They are making a killing on these days of short supply.
|
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. They shut a lot down in the 90's. A couple I know of in Ohio. |
|
With the intent to create a bottleneck, and tighten supply. There are documents to prove that they conspired.
|
DU9598
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Funny you should mention South Dakota |
|
Just across the river from Sioux City, Iowa, the Houston-based energy company Hyperion is in the early stages to secure land to build the nation's newest and hopefully greenist oil refinery. Read about it here: < http://www.absolutedsm.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2202&start=210>
|
dysfunctional press
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
i don't think that they would be too kind to a refinery.
it's best to have them closer to the source- i.e. tankers and off-shore rigs.
|
Sal Minella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Think this one (in So. Dak) is intended for oil piped down from Canada -- |
|
'member when The Dark Lord of Dark Matter went to Canada to check on the oil sands resources? So what that it's an ecological disaster, you think he cares?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |