|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:37 PM Original message |
Bush's IQ is apparently 125? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarryNite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzNick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
56. IQ test = BS. I know, I've scored between 120 and... 180!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 05:20 AM Response to Reply #56 |
80. Sorry, but I think GPA's do mean something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. No chance in Hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smokey nj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe they forgot to put in a decimal point . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WA98296 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
That Is Quite Enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. I know the ad you're talking about. The IQ changes from time to time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Lol, I guess the decider don't know how smurt he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. I saw it at 99 once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. Maybe for the whole family, but that's a stretch, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. Only when using the metric system... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. IQ is a capacity to learn not evidence of learning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Not dumb, but completely lacking in "common sense". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. If you use 100% of a 110 IQ, you are smarter than someone who uses half of a 200 IQ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
49. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TK421 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. Wrong source....sorry, but that was his body weight at one time during his heavy coke-use days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. Double post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ishoutandscream2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. Hell, that's my IQ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. No Fucking Way He's a 105 tops.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
20score (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
14. It's a little known fact that his father was able to buy 50 IQ points from his contacts from Yale. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileyRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. I thought 125 would be average. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. No. There are 2 accepted IQ tests. And in neither would 125 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
39. 138 is exceptional.... who told you that you were average? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileyRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #39 |
71. I'm pretty average |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tpsbmam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
16. No chance in hell is his IQ 125...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
17. If IQ stands for 'Idiot Quotient" then I believe it. Otherwise, no way in hell. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
18. Only if IQ tests give out bonus points for legacies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
19. No way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. hehe more like 1+2+5=8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faux pas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
21. 125 is probably his hat size, NO WAY that's his IQ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
50. 125 would be huge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:46 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. His EGO's hat size is 125; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faux pas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 02:45 AM Response to Reply #50 |
70. 125 would probably fit his over inflated empty fat head. For sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
24. 125 isn't really all that much for a Harvard grad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeposeTheBoyKing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. I tested once at 135 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Trust me, his IQ ain't 125. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
29. I hope you don't believe everything you see on the internets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. lol, I'll get my routing number hold on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Please hurry. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. By the way, I'm completely friggin broke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
32. Wow. He must have been sober that day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
33. He entered office with a 125 left over from Clinton... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
34. ROFLMAO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
35. They obviously tested the pretzel, not the container. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
38. Really? Let me see if this works. I'm Pope John Paul the Second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
40. Well yes, but that's not base 10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
41. No No No. . . ."1. 25". . . get it RIGHT people!. . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
42. But the person he is playing is more like 92...and that person is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
43. That was BEFORE drugs and alcohol took their toll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chicagoexpat (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
44. Only on a VERY GENEROUS curve (the famed "gentleman's curve" employed @ Yale for the rich & fatuous) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
45. If you count his score three times maybe.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JitterbugPerfume (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
46. yeah right , his IQ is 125 AND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
47. Then mine must be 250 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Riddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
48. Maybe they measured it in metric. 125 kph = 77 mph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
51. He very well may have scored 125 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riverdeep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
85. The source of this dubious claim comes from just one guy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
52. Did he take the test on a Diebold machine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdxmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
53. Damn, don't you hate those misplaced decimals? That should be 12.5 N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renaissance Man (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
54. 125 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
misanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-12-08 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
55. 100 is median average for general population**nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
58. 125? Maybe in octal. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
entanglement (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 12:58 AM Response to Reply #58 |
63. That's 85 in base 10...still sounds a tad high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
59. Bush is more intellectually lazy and incurious than anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
60. Son of a gun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 04:57 AM Response to Reply #60 |
78. Many Bushels. Countless, Unending Bushels. A Cornucopia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
61. I'm a 186'er. I can believe it, having seen him "slip" and not try to "pass". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
62. That's according to a test that measures "Capacity for Pure Evil"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
64. I believe it. I knew a guy who tested 130, he was an ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 01:10 AM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Unfortunately IQ is not an indicator of character . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
65. 100 is average. He probably is 125 but Cheney is over 150. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dems_rightnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 06:32 AM Response to Reply #65 |
82. You can't be serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 11:58 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. actually its about top 20-25% from what I understand and I've seen the bell curves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
66. consider, this test was done before W ever picked up a beer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sivafae (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
68. Any stripper'll tell you, it takes a lot of smarts to act that dumb. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
69. No, that's -125 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
72. You need to consider the units: 125 morans = IQ of 63 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
73. Internet IQ tests are totally unreliable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bean fidhleir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
74. 100 is the middle of "average", but there's measurement slop of about 15 points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PfcHammer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
75. Prolly a printing error. Should say 125 proof. hehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burma Jones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
76. He's not as dumb as he is lazy......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arthritisR_US (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
77. that seems awfully high for him...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
79. A true estimate would be 92. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
81. Let me guess: The test was scored by Diebold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 06:35 AM Response to Original message |
83. I didn't know that they had touch screen IQ tests too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
84. It's possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laststeamtrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
86. Isn't that the aggregate for the whole family? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duke Newcombe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
88. There's an IQ, and there's practical application |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oak2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
89. Makes sense: just smart enough to be manipulative, but not smart enough to be genuinely bright n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
90. there is no test that a rich frat-boy repuke can't buy an A on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-15-08 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
91. I'll buy that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC