Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's IQ is apparently 125?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:37 PM
Original message
Bush's IQ is apparently 125?
Just saw this little "click on me" ad for one of those internet IQ tests. It has a cartoon picture of Bush and a caption that says: "His IQ is 125. Are you smarter than Bush?"

Have the changed the scale? I thought 100+ was basically above average. There's no fuckin way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzNick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. IQ test = BS. I know, I've scored between 120 and... 180!!!
IQ test only test one thing: your capacity to pass IQ tests.

I have consistantly passed them with increasing scores.

Even in the army, they said I was so f-ing smart and put me in front of a computer doing stuff I can't tell. It was interesting but I miss not being a grunt. Sometimes.

Am I smart? I like to think so, but am I a genius? No, certainly not.

Do I feel smarter than Bush? Quite a lot.

IQ tests do not mean anything. GPAs either. Some smart people do not do as well as some idiots, because they did not take the same classes, or the teacher is more lenient, or simply the smart guy wants to spend more time doing other things.

It cracks me up when I hear that Bush had a higher GPA that Kerry. Well, that proves that Bush is better at doing what he is asked to do and that Kerry is a maverick.

I did not do well at school, to be frank, good thing I had a passion for computers and programming, somehow software engineers are paid better than teachers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #56
80. Sorry, but I think GPA's do mean something.
They don't measure how smart people are, but they are a factor in determining how hard someone works. Usually, I think people with high GPA's are hard workers. And there are other factors, of course. People with low GPA's aren't necessarily lazy; they may have to work more (as in paid work) during school, or they may have kids to take care of, or they may simply be bad test-takers. But I think a high GPA is one of many indications that someone is a pretty hard worker. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. No chance in Hell
Maybe 12.5, and they forgot the decimal point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe they forgot to put in a decimal point .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
That Is Quite Enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I know the ad you're talking about. The IQ changes from time to time.
I've seen it at 100, 125 and a couple others before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Lol, I guess the decider don't know how smurt he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. I saw it at 99 once
and figured it was correct, or close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe for the whole family, but that's a stretch, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Only when using the metric system...
divide by 2.54 to get his actual IQ, 49.2

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. IQ is a capacity to learn not evidence of learning
You can have a 200 IQ and be dumb as a mud fence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Not dumb, but completely lacking in "common sense".
But 125? Really? That's considered gifted - and I'm not talking "differently" gifted. There's no way in hell. Without the MSM, the Neocons, PNACers and the loyalists, he'd have gone down in flames before the 2000 election.

I've been around awhile and can't recall any famous personality with as many enablers or given as many free passes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. If you use 100% of a 110 IQ, you are smarter than someone who uses half of a 200 IQ
That's my point. It's the capacity to know, it's not what he actually knows. He's a howling idiot, no question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. I agree
It isn't the best analogy in the world but I feel the human mind is not unlike a muscle. It needs exercise.

"A man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them."
-Mark Twain

Whatever brain cells he didn't destroy snortin' whiskey and drinkin' cocaine have died either from loneliness or atrophy. He has never stuck me as a man with much interest in book smarts or even much curiosity about the world around him.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wrong source....sorry, but that was his body weight at one time during his heavy coke-use days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Double post
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 06:46 PM by Tallison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hell, that's my IQ
Measured by the Stanford Binet I took about ten years ago. I am now thoroughly depressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. No Fucking Way He's a 105 tops....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's a little known fact that his father was able to buy 50 IQ points from his contacts from Yale.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 06:56 PM by 20score
They're not real points per se, but..you know, lipstick on a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. I thought 125 would be average.
IQ changes over time, mostly because the test is subjective, IMHO. But I *KNOW* I'm average and the lowest I have ever tested is 138.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. No. There are 2 accepted IQ tests. And in neither would 125
be considered average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. 138 is exceptional.... who told you that you were average? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #39
71. I'm pretty average
My SAT's were just below 1000, I struggled in college to the point I wasn't able to juggle working with studies and ended up getting too tired to go on. (so I never finished). I have my talents, don't misunderstand, but after nearly 50 years in this world and seeing some pretty dang smart people around me and some pretty dang stupid people around me, I am definitely AVERAGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. No chance in hell is his IQ 125......
That's the "superior range." My dogs are smarter than Bush. The average physician is in the high average range (110-119) just to give you a frame of reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. If IQ stands for 'Idiot Quotient" then I believe it. Otherwise, no way in hell. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Only if IQ tests give out bonus points for legacies.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 06:54 PM by Marr
I think it's pretty obvious that Junior has below average intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. No way.
Bush can't be that smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. hehe more like 1+2+5=8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. 125 is probably his hat size, NO WAY that's his IQ!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. 125 would be huge
I have a pretty big head, and take 7 7/8. A size 125 hat? That's big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. His EGO's hat size is 125;
He probably still can't think of a single mistake he's ever made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #50
70. 125 would probably fit his over inflated empty fat head. For sure
there's nothing inside it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. 125 isn't really all that much for a Harvard grad
besides, it's not your IQ it's what you do with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeposeTheBoyKing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. I tested once at 135
No freaking way am I only 10 points smarter than Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Trust me, his IQ ain't 125. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. I hope you don't believe everything you see on the internets.
But, if you do, I am a Nigerian prince ...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. lol, I'll get my routing number hold on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Please hurry. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. By the way, I'm completely friggin broke
Still want it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. Wow. He must have been sober that day.
Aberration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. He entered office with a 125 left over from Clinton...
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 07:43 PM by Orsino
...but will of course leave behind a huge deficit. Hell, if Obama doesn't disinfect carefully, he'll probably lose twenty points the first time he sits in the big chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Lol
Duzy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
34. ROFLMAO!
:rofl: Must've lower the bar on IQ. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. They obviously tested the pretzel, not the container.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. Really? Let me see if this works. I'm Pope John Paul the Second.
Hey, I said it and I'm sure I can find about 12 batshit insane people who talk to light poles on Cleveland's streets who'd agree with me, so it MUST be true.

Bewsh cannot even form a coherent sentence. He can't even get the phrase "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me" right in front of a small audience.

I'm guessing learning capacity is dictated by the dictators as well as history. If that's true, I weep for our future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. Well yes, but that's not base 10
Octal at best, base 6 at worst.

There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary math and those who don't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. No No No. . . ."1. 25". . . get it RIGHT people!. . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
42. But the person he is playing is more like 92...and that person is...
...the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
43. That was BEFORE drugs and alcohol took their toll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagoexpat Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
44. Only on a VERY GENEROUS curve (the famed "gentleman's curve" employed @ Yale for the rich & fatuous)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
45. If you count his score three times maybe..
...otherwise I call bullshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. yeah right , his IQ is 125 AND
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 10:27 PM by JitterbugPerfume
I am fk'ing Einstein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
47. Then mine must be 250
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
48. Maybe they measured it in metric. 125 kph = 77 mph
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
51. He very well may have scored 125
There is a class bias to IQ tests, or so it's been alleged. If so, then the construct that IQ measures may be something other than intelligence: it may be whether one has gotten the sort of upbringing the folks who designed the tests regard as "good." If that's the case, then 125 may be a fairly low score for someone such as Bush, who certainly had every advantage. (See Schiff & Lewontin).

Also, we would want to know what test was used. My wife's a psychologist, and she's tested me with several different ones. The one her grad school regarded as definitive at the time was the Weschler (WAIS, in whatever version), which has a number of different subtests. Bush probably did about average at the verbal tasks, but he might have been good at some of the performance subtests. You can also get better at the test, so if he took the test 10 times and scored 125 on the last one, then his actual IQ is probably lower. It also is the case that most folks score lower as they age. If the reported score of 125 is based on a test Bush took in the Air National Guard, then his score today is probably much lower, given his notorious intellectual sloth.

For what it's worth, IQ probably does measure something. Mine's fairly high, and I do have a PhD, so it seems possible that it is some sort of predictor of academic success. (Of course, it could be the other way around: if your mom takes you aside in first grade and tells you you're smarter than 99% of the population, she's also probably going to treat you differently, and you're probably going to act differently, than if you'd never taken the test.) I've also made some really, really stupid calls in my life for which all my vaunted book learning availed me little. The WAIS has no real social component, and so you can have a high IQ, swell verbal skills, and do great at block design, but not be able to tell if someone is lying to you, if you are being manipulated, or when someone wants to be your friend. This form of intelligence, this social cunning, is one area where I think Bush probably has a higher than average score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #51
85. The source of this dubious claim comes from just one guy,
Steve Sailor. He believes with every fiber of his being in the Bell Curve, and believes IQ is everything. According to him, Bush's is 125, Kerry is 120, and Gore is 134. All these things are based on things like their SAT scores and tests administered for the military when they were in their teens and twenties. To have one guy as the source of all of this is a bit odd. Multiple analysis from different people would be better. He does seek opinions from a couple of others, but one of them is Charles Murray.

According to him, Bush is extremely competitive but highly uncurious, and plays dumb as a form of camouflage.

I won't link to the site because it is basically an intellectual version of a white supremacy site, but you can google 'bush kerry iq'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
52. Did he take the test on a Diebold machine?
That's the only way that fucktard could even get CLOSE to 125.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. Damn, don't you hate those misplaced decimals? That should be 12.5 N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renaissance Man Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
54. 125
A 125 IQ is not that hard to attain. If you're in the 140+ range, then you're brilliant.

IQ tests that I've taken range anywhere from 130-145 depending upon the test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
55. 100 is median average for general population**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
58. 125? Maybe in octal. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #58
63. That's 85 in base 10...still sounds a tad high
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
59. Bush is more intellectually lazy and incurious than anything
He also thinks he already has all the answers, so...well, there's no room for further data at that point.

The sad thing is McShame is a couple notches below and so are those he surrounds himself with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
60. Son of a gun.
He certainly hides it well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #60
78. Many Bushels. Countless, Unending Bushels. A Cornucopia.
Teh CIA is taking notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
61. I'm a 186'er. I can believe it, having seen him "slip" and not try to "pass".
Bush only *seems* stupid, because that's how he plays the game.

It wins elections to be a "common man", to seem like an "average guy/girl".

The American populace has been trained to distrust intellect from a very young age.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
62. That's according to a test that measures "Capacity for Pure Evil"...
Cheney is off the charts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
64. I believe it. I knew a guy who tested 130, he was an ass.
The funniest thing is he held a grudge against the kids in the gifted program at school. One day in AP History he was bitching about it and said "You guys get it so good and just because of 5 points I don't get in" A buddy of mine said "130? That's far too low" Oh it was grand; he was so pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. Unfortunately IQ is not an indicator of character . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
65. 100 is average. He probably is 125 but Cheney is over 150.
Most of the people on this board are 125 or above. He's smart enough to know he's making some serious bank from being the president. He's smart enough to lie to our faces. He doesn't figure out how to do it. THAT takes serious intellect and he doesn't have that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #65
82. You can't be serious
about "most of the people on this board are 125 and above". That's something like the top 5%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. actually its about top 20-25% from what I understand and I've seen the bell curves
though I can't remember precise numbers anymore. 125 really isn't that amazing. I'm over 140, most of my friends are higher than me. Democrats/liberals tend to have much higher IQs (no BS) because they are more critical thinkers/more analytical/more flexible in their ability to think in the abstract. They (we) can shift mental landscapes and paradigms more easily which allows us to be more empathic. People on a board like this want to be mentally challenged and think outside the box (not to say there's no stubbornness) but most of us aren't dems just because we were raised that way and didn't think it through. Repubs/conservatives tend to buy whatever's being sold which is why the MSM propaganda works for them. The lemming mentality. That's more of an average IQ. Able to function, work, pay bills, hate, judge without knowing, etc. Sad but true.
As I said Bush is smart enough to realize that his behavior is criminal but not smart enough to think about anything beyond the immediate gratification though he is pretty proficient at CYA techniques. He's not the planner or the orchestrator. That takes greater intelligence ie Cheney, Rove, Wolfowitz et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
66. consider, this test was done before W ever picked up a beer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
68. Any stripper'll tell you, it takes a lot of smarts to act that dumb. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
69. No, that's -125
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
72. You need to consider the units: 125 morans = IQ of 63
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
73. Internet IQ tests are totally unreliable
Not even getting into the debate over the more general validity of IQ tests (very controversial issue), but if a test is thought really to measure IQ, it is not made widely available, in case people practice taking it and thus don't give a valid result when tested on it at a later stage.

Thus, Bush's score on an internet IQ test would tell us nothing about his actual intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
74. 100 is the middle of "average", but there's measurement slop of about 15 points
So anything from 85 to 115 is considered average.

A score of 116-132 is characterized as "bright", and it's possible that Bush legitimately scores in that range, because the only consensus among psychologists is that IQ tests measure IQ. There's no consensus about the tests measuring "intelligence" (or even that there is any such atomic quality as "intelligence")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
75. Prolly a printing error. Should say 125 proof. hehe
:toast: :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
76. He's not as dumb as he is lazy.........
And being lazy brained is a good definition of stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
77. that seems awfully high for him...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
79. A true estimate would be 92. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
81. Let me guess: The test was scored by Diebold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
83. I didn't know that they had touch screen IQ tests too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
84. It's possible
I read somewhere that 140 is the average IQ of a Yale graduate. Even though he didn't do great grade wise, he still managed to graduate without putting in a lot of hard work.
Al Gore also says that George Bush is not stupid like some people think. I think that Mr. Gore would be a good judge of that.
I have also noticed that Bush has seemed to get a lot dumber since he first ran for president. I don't know if this is because of stress, drugs/alcohol, other health problems, or an act. Perhaps it is a combination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
86. Isn't that the aggregate for the whole family? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
88. There's an IQ, and there's practical application
Bush ain't got the second right, so the number doesn't mean a hill of beans.

Also, the "normal" range for IQ scores is between 85 and 115.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
89. Makes sense: just smart enough to be manipulative, but not smart enough to be genuinely bright n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
90. there is no test that a rich frat-boy repuke can't buy an A on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
91. I'll buy that
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 12:36 AM by krispos42
He's narcissistic, psychotic, very ambitious, intellectually uncurious, has trouble-with cause-and-effect relationships (both by birth and by breeding), and can readily reject facts if they don't fit with his established mental framework. All of which has little to do with his ability to solve problems, understanding geometric relationships, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC