ullad
(153 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:06 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 08:09 PM by ullad
Just curious, is he chewing tobacco? His left cheek seems to bulge. Or does he have a POW injury there?
|
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's where he had cancer surgery. |
lilymidnite
(330 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message |
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Oh, I thought it was from when he was beaten |
|
hmmm, I had no idea it was due to cancer.
|
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Melanoma, 4 of them. The lumpiness is the result of swelling due to the removal of ly,ph glands.
Melanoma is the most dangerous type of skin cancer. Don't you feel safe and secure, knowing Miss Moosemeat is ready to take over on day one?
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. No, And I won't be friendly with anybody who votes for the liar and the liar |
|
Liars squared. Only bigots would vote for such a crew.
|
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
15. The lump is big enough to deserve a pet name, really. |
greblc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
ullad
(153 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. You people here are just too much LOL |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 08:16 PM by ullad
It looks like he has cotton or something stuffed in his cheek.
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. The "you people" comment. Buh-bye! |
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Restylane injections to look less old. Problem is, when you inject skin that sags..... |
|
You get balloons, not a face.
|
ullad
(153 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Then he should have injections on the right side to be evenly saggy |
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. I'm sure he did, but remember, people don't age even..... |
|
... maybe that side has sagged a LOT and if they tried to "match" them, maybe one side of his face would be higher than the other, or who knows? All I know is that he looks like he has a half lb. of nuts in one cheek.
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. That's a good point. We know that they have work done when they run. |
|
I wonder how much Cindy Mc has had done recently.
BTW, I'm amazed you even got a look at his left profile. They usually try to keep his right profile to the camera.
|
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. If you notice McCain's forehead, it's almost without lines. |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 08:30 PM by Sarah Ibarruri
How many 72 year old men's foreheads look that way? Particularly ones like McCain who are showing early signs of decrepitude via their poor memory and inability to be fully coherent?
As for all 3, McCain, Palin and Cindy, all 3 have had their teeth crowned and Palin chose the whitest color on the dental color card.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
16. second one today that i`ve seen.... |
|
nothing happening on the other sites today?
|
NEDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. The OP has been tombstoned |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |