Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Odds of an October Surprise that could influence the election have risen appreciably."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:43 AM
Original message
"Odds of an October Surprise that could influence the election have risen appreciably."
LAT: An Afghan 'October surprise'?
New technology used in Iraq and Afghanistan to hunt down and kill terrorists may inject itself into the presidential race.
Tim Rutten
September 13, 2008

Friday, The Times' Greg Miller and Julian E. Barnes reported that the United States has escalated its war against Al Qaeda and its Taliban allies by "deploying Predator aircraft equipped with sophisticated new surveillance systems that were instrumental in crippling the insurgency in Iraq."

It's a story whose significance may extend well beyond the benighted hills and valleys of Pakistan's violent Pashtun hinterlands and onto the hustings of our current presidential campaign. Coupled with Thursday's report in the New York Times that President Bush has signed a secret order permitting Afghanistan-based U.S. special operations forces to cross into Pakistan without Islamabad's permission, the odds of an "October surprise" that could influence the general election have risen appreciably....

***

Beyond the purely military considerations, there are potentially significant political implications. First and most obvious is the question of the surge's efficacy. The answer matters, particularly to John McCain, who has been one of the surge's most resolute supporters. If it turns out that it was only one -- and, perhaps, the least consequential -- in a confluence of successful American initiatives, then McCain could go from steadfast to stubborn in voters' minds.

The real wild card pops up if this new surveillance technology allows U.S. forces to find and kill Osama bin Laden....

If U.S. special operations forces capture or kill Bin Laden, or if a CIA technician pushes a button and puts a Hellfire missile between his eyes, Bush will have made good on the vows he made seven years ago to bring the Al Qaeda leader to some sort of justice. In the eyes of many who supported him over the years, that would allow the president to leave office with at least part of his historical reputation intact.

There also are many Republican activists who must hope that an October surprise involving Bin Laden would give McCain -- unswerving supporter of the war and advocate of a muscular, hard-line foreign policy -- a boost by association. At the very least, anything that makes his connection to his party's now dismally unpopular president less of a stigma helps the GOP candidate....

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-rutten13-2008sep13,0,1960509.column
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. And when will they start using that new toy here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. When McCain's poll numbers dip to 30%. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. There's got to be a way to use this to political advantage...
...Obama's people need to discover and use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think it would be difficult, but this is suggested at the end of the article --
"Still, it's also possible that this particular October surprise might also help Barack Obama, at least at the margins, which is where this election increasingly looks to be decided. The Democratic nominee, after all, opposed going to war in Iraq, in part because it was a distraction from the conflict with the Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda, which had, after all, committed the 9/11 atrocities. If a military technology heretofore monopolized by operations in Iraq finally brings Bin Laden to answer for his crimes, Obama and his supporters can argue that the war in Iraq delayed the day of reckoning in Afghanistan."

Maybe if Obama could make this point preemptively, keeping in mind that the "Surprise" could be coming --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Seems That *Co Is Doing Everything That Obama Has Been Saying.....
- pull out of Iraq
- more troops to Afghanistan
- go into Pakistan to rid terrorists

It seems that most things that Obama has been running on - either *Co or McCain have gravitated to his ideas and they are trying to pre-empt him before Nov.

So I guess the Bush Doctrine is still in existence - and now it is being used to beat Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Isn't that the truth
This is the truth behind Biden's refrain "Barack Obama was right!" He's shown excellent judgment. If only the electorate could see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Seems to me the crux would be...
...making the questions about the timing and intent supersede the action in the voters' minds. "They're playing games with justice for political ambition. The people who died on September 11th deserve better. You deserve better. America deserves better."

Then use party affiliation to tie McCain in with that. The more times they use the ubiquitous photos of McCain all chummy with Shrub, the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Here's One:
Bill Clinton and the Democrats managed to capture, put on public trial, and convict ALL the terrorists involved in the First WTC Bombing.

*They did it in less than one year.

*The Democrats didn't have to borrow $1Trillion from China.

*There were ZERO American casualties.

*There were ZERO civilian casualties.

*The Democrats didn't have to SPY on American citizens.

*The rest of the World didn't wind up hating us.

*The Geneva Conventions weren't trashed.

*The US Constitution wasn't trashed.

*Nobody was tortured.


Who do you want chasing the terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Not bad, bvar22! And all true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Very effective! Nicely done**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. "...systems that were instrumental in crippling the insurgency in Iraq."
what do they do...? deploy huge wads of cash...? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another report...
...on the same effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northsongs Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. American forces into Pakistan...
I've been thinking about this a bit.
I can understand why all of a sudden Bush thinks getting Bin Laden would help his 'legacy'. But at the same time his press secretary is saying Bin Laden wasn't the mastermind of 911. I remember 3-4 years ago even Bush made the statement that he wasn't all that worried about Bin Laden anymore.

So it appears to be a totally political move on his part to now go after BL. The shame of it is he's putting American forces, once again, into danger to satisfy one of his egocentric visions.
Some legacy...


"When people think, they vote Democratic." - Bill Clinton

Obama-Biden '08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's not his legacy...
...It's BO they're going after, not OBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Excellent points, northsongs -- welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. They could show us a coffin with a wax model of bin laden
and say "that's his body... we succeeded" and who's to know better?
Like when they showed us pictures of the Hussein boys.
How do we KNOW they're dead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. HA HA HA HA
I said the exact same thing here three or four days ago on DU and was laughed at and ridiculed, and my OP never even got five recs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. "...instrumental in crippling the insurgency in Iraq."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC