This site should be banned!!!!

[samplegirl]

If liberals did this.......it would be rightwing talking daily!!

Republicans are pigs!!!!

http://www.shoottheliberals.com/

[samplegirl]

1. What genius thought this one up???

[Not Me]

8. Here's their domain registration info

The data contained in this Registrar's WHOIS database,
while believed by the registrar to be reliable, is provided "as is"
with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy. This
information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you
in obtaining information about domain name registration records.
Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden without the prior written
permission of this registrar. By submitting an inquiry,
you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty. In particular,
you agree not to use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise make possible,
dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety, for any
purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and
solicitations of any kind, including spam. You further agree
not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic electronic
processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose,
including mining this data for your own personal or commercial purposes.

Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified
in the "registrant" field. In most cases, the Registrar
is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database.


Registrant:
Domains by Proxy, Inc.

DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States

Registered through: Sitequest.net
Domain Name: SHOOTTHELIBERALS.COM
Created on: 20-Nov-07
Expires on: 21-Nov-09
Last Updated on: 07-Mar-08

Administrative Contact:
Private, Registration [e-mail]
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
[phone] Fax -- [phone]

Technical Contact:
Private, Registration [e-mail]
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
[phone] Fax -- [phone]

Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.BLUEHOST.COM
NS2.BLUEHOST.COM

[WePurrsevere]

17. Domains by Proxy is for those who want to remain annonymous. It's quite possibly

registered through GoDaddy. BlueHost.com is probably just the sites host... they probably choose it due to the name. :eyes:

[Rocknrule]

33. Probably Jim Adkisson

[lynnertic]

2. I'll help by not following the link to give them traffic/ad revenue.

Thanks for the warning.

[begin_within]

26. I did, and there's nothing even remotely clever, original, entertaining or funny there.

There are like 12 "games" but only 2 are operational, the others say "Coming Soon." The ones that work appear to be just hacks of existing games, to include faces of Democrats. Very poor Photoshop work too (they probably just used Paint or whatever that free thing that comes with Windows is called).

[Phred42]

3. The Reich-minded ARE insane.

We are going to have to stop ignoring that fact and deal with it head on - eventually.

[polichick]

4. Not pigs, SOCIOPATHS. That's the word that should go viral!

[libodem]

5. OMG!

After watching part 1 and 2 of Bill Moyer's Journal this morning in the DU video section this is not only scary it should be illegal. I'm outraged.

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

6. Banned from what?

What the fuck are you talking about?

[samplegirl]

12. O.K.

Removed!!!

[dems_rightnow]

14. What should be our criteria for removing internet material?

You're now Queen of the Internet, tell us your rules.

[fascisthunter]

18. Maybe a Web Site Inciting Murder

tell ya what... I dare you to say Shoot (enter name of group) on DU. Why do you suppose it would get you banned from this site?

[samplegirl]

27. Same reason it would of been a locked thread

in the D.U. Watch who your calling Queen smartass.

[Regret My New Name]

7. Why advertise it?

Now a couple hundred (or probably more) people who would have never seen it are going to click on it to see what you're talking about.
Maybe that was the goal, I dunno.... Either way, it might be tasteless and lame, but I don't think we should be going around banning websites just for that.

[samplegirl]

13. Well let's just see how long this would last if it were shoot

the Republicans!!!

[Forrest Greene]

20. Well, Just As An Experiment

...why not register exactly that domain name, & see?

[Bjorn Against]

9. That is in very poor taste...

I don't think it should be banned because it is clearly satire and I don't think it could be reasonably considered to be a serious threat. I support the first amendment even for sick disgusting people like the ones who put this site up. But make no mistake, these people are evil and I hope this tasteless site backfires on them and ends up hurting John McCain.

[heliarc]

10. Fascists. nt

[mass independent]

11. If it weren't for the fact

that I'm a strong believer in the Constitution I may agree with you.

Unfortunately that 1st Amendment thing cuts both ways. At least it's supposed to at least if anyone running the government is paying attention to the document which hasn't been really the case of recent.

Which makes me find the headline on their site, "Stop Liberals From Stealing Bill Of Rights" all the more ironic. I might even find it funny if that statement and that site weren't just plain frightening on a certain level.

At least they're lumping McCain in with liberals (huh?) if you watch their entire lies and distortions flash intro.

[tpsbmam]

28. Freedom of speech doesn't include....

inciting violence against other people. That said, I haven't and won't go to the site so I'm going only by the name of the site.

Schenck v. United States (1919):

Oliver Wendell Holmes: The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. <...> The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.

Brandenburg v. Ohio: speech could only be banned when it was directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot), the test which remains until this day.

[Taverner]

15. Alright - who wants to start shoottherepublicans.com with me

And I'll go balls out over these people

Have a Shooting gallery gane where you chase an unarmed Sarah Palin through the woods. Oh, and you're an armed bear.

[fascisthunter]

16. Can't They Be Sued for Inciting Murder or Terrorism?

[dems_rightnow]

19. No

Does it really look like they're requesting the deaths of democrats? Really?

It's an obvious satire and game, although stupid.

[fascisthunter]

21. It "OBVIOUS"? Hmmm... very interesting

[dems_rightnow]

22. It's obvious to me...

.... regardless of how "interesting" you find that.

[fascisthunter]

23. not too interesting, but interesting enough

I Think legal action is required in this instance... I'd let the court decide over your objection....

This type of shit should never be tolerated. Since you think it's satire, how about I build a web site with your identity as the url and see how satirical you find it.

[samplegirl]

24. This is even below freeper

mentality.

[dems_rightnow]

30. Do you think I'm defending that site?

I'm not. To make it very clear.....

It's repugnant and vile. It's not funny or particularly novel. However, I don't think it's anything criminal, which would be the only way I'd support internet censorship.

[samplegirl]

31. I just get tired trying to defend which party

is truly the party of hate!!!

[tpsbmam]

36. The game becomes a little more serious when you think of people like this.....

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/jul/28/church-shooting-police-find-manifesto-suspects-car/

Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity on accused shooter's reading list

4-page letter outlines frustration, hatred of 'liberal movement'


All you need is for one unbalanced person to go to that site and stoke their hatred and willingness to take this to real life. Nothing good can come of a site like this. That's not to say that something bad will, but for sure nothing good can come of it.

[ElectricSoul]

25. Ban the Site

I agree.

[ThatsMyBarack]

29. Welcome to DU, Electric Soul!

:hi:

(I won't even LOOK at that site in question!)

[samplegirl]

32. Sometimes were not always sweet in here

and one forgets were on the same side even though we have different opionions.
Hope you feel free to leave yours and welcome to D.U.

:hi:

[SmileyRose]

34. er - banning websites?

Now see, to me that's right up there with wiping one's ass with the Constitution.

[BigAnth]

35. Some real high-brow stuff here. "Where Did My Metals Go?" w/ pic of Kerry

Are these guys just plain stupid cause they're fundies, or are they trying to appeal to the sub-literate crowd?