Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deadline passes; horse in Hickman still grazing ( 7 lawyers to defend horse from annexation)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:31 PM
Original message
Deadline passes; horse in Hickman still grazing ( 7 lawyers to defend horse from annexation)

http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10433900

Published Monday September 15, 2008
Deadline passes; horse in Hickman still grazing
BY PAUL HAMMEL
WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

LINCOLN – A 1 p.m. deadline passed today and the last horse in the Lincoln suburb of Hickman is still grazing in his pasture, awaiting the start of an anticipated court battle over whether he must move out.

Defenders of the horse, named "Peter Rabbit," have become so numerous that the city of 1,500 has had to establish a separate voice-mail system for phone callers and a separate e - mail address for those wanting to protest the city’s decision to enforce an ordinance banning livestock within city limits.

A team of seven lawyers saddled up last week to defend the horse, whose pasture is now surrounded by development in the fast-growing suburb.

Kelly Hoffschneider, Hickman’s city attorney, said the community plans to begin issuing citations to the horse’s owner, Harley Scott, as soon as Scott returns to his home in Hickman.

Scott was out of town on Monday, as was his son, Jack, who owns the pasture on which Peter Rabbit, 32, has lived his entire life.

Scott can then either pay the $100-a-day citations or – as he’s promised in the past – fight the tickets in court.

The tale of the horse took a turn two years ago his pasture was annexed within the city, putting the horse in violation of the city law. It’s sparked a battle that is spiced with small-town politics and clashing personalities.

The Scotts have argued that the horse should enjoy "grandfather rights" and be left alone, while city officials maintain that allowing an exception could cause problems with others wishing to have horses, goats and pigs in the city.

Also at link previous stories: • Legal posse formed to help save old Hickman horse

• Legal cavalry rides to old horse's defense


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow - I've never heard of any change in city limits or zoning
that didn't grandfather existing land use!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Friggin economy is going to shit and they're arguing over a horse...
Let the old guy eat his grass for a couple more years. Gees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. The horse is in violation. Really?
Here is a family of bobcats who moved into a home emptied by foreclosure.


http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-bobcats5-2008sep05,1,1680944.story

When will people accept that some things in nature cannot be annexed?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC