Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Racist Sock?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 06:32 PM
Original message
A Racist Sock?
http://www.racialicious.com/2008/09/15/a-racist-sock/

Y’all know this job gets to me sometimes, right? Everyday, I get an email inbox and a del.icio.us inbox full of racist goodies from here and around the world.

But I was really about to pack it in when I got an email about a sock.

A sock?

A fucking sock?

How are they going to make a racist sock? I’m used to racist tee-shirts, but a sock just crosses the line!

Then I re-read the email, and found out it wasn’t the sock that was racist, it was the marketing of said sock.

Reader Tennille writes:

Old Navy is now selling what they call border patrol socks for baby in sizes 0-6 months through 5T. Here’s the description and the link: “Fun socks feature military inspired embroidery sure to have your little man transforming everything he can get his hands on into an aerial assault vehicle capable of unstoppable fire power only to be used in the defense of the defenseless <…> The racist, xenophobic, and gendered messages in these socks are amazingly obvious and saddening to me. I thought this might make good fodder for a posting.”

Tennille sent me the email August 26th. I checked the link, saw it was as she stated, and the socks were called “Border Patrol.” Fail, Old Navy, Fail.

Now that I am prepping this post (a hot three weeks later), I notice some changes have been made.

The socks are now called “Military Graphic Socks for Baby,” and the description has changed:

Get his feet in fighting shape! Cute cartoonish graphics of helicopters and jets suit his adventurous spirit.

Well, they got rid of the racism and xenophobia - two out of three. I’m glad someone finally noticed and caught on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's all conditioning. Check out kids clothes at many stores,
Edited on Mon Sep-15-08 07:34 PM by vickiss
camo in all shades. Even for infants. It ties in with the video assault on kids by our military, imho.

The little girls clothes look a bit skanky too. And I am not a prude by any means, but do 6yo girls really need black lace, infants need stilettos? Makes you fear for these little girls pushed by corps into growing up way too fast. Maybe I am a prude...

Bastards cannot have my grandson, my nephews or my nieces.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC