Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:41 AM
Original message |
Should mccain & palin be required to pee in a cup like we're forced to when applying for a job? |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-16-08 05:48 AM by Philosoraptor
I'm sure that if bush had been given a pee test before the election, he'd have never been elected, or if he'd had random, surprise pee tests it would have been discovered that he was on a whole list of pharmaceuticals, and who knows what else.
|
grannie4peace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:43 AM
Response to Original message |
ITsec
(477 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. McCain couldn't aim it into the cup without spilling it everywhere... |
|
Where's nurse Ratched when we need her?
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:50 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I think its a fair request for anyone running for president |
|
If its good enough for the troops (Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen) it should be a requirement for a prospective Commander in Chief.
|
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. & good enough for my son applying at Sears Lawn & Garden |
LunaSea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message |
4. McCains never filled out a job application in his life. |
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They should also be required to be interviewed by a REAL journalist. Not one of these sympathizers like Charlie Gibson and Shaun Hannity.
Multiple interviews.
|
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. We treat these people like kings and potentates |
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I don't think anyone should be forced to take drug tests... they're an invasion of privacy |
|
that goes for you, me, anybody.
|
Jeanette in FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 06:04 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Yes and random tests as well |
|
If it is good enough for my company.
When we are doing work for the federal government, me and my employess can be drugged tested at will.
I never understood why our Federally elected officials can't be as well.
|
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-16-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Should be a requirement for anyone running for Public Office |
|
being nominated to fill a government post or judgeship.
|
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-17-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Yes.. And random colonoscopy too.. |
|
So we can have some idea what they're getting ready to pull out of their ass next.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |