So which is better~ "Change we can believe in" or "Change we need"

[Winterblues]

And why the change? :shrug:

[DJ13]

1. I like "Change worth fighting for" myself

But nobody asked me for my opinion.

Of those two I like the first one, as it was the original.

[Winterblues]

5. Everyone knows we need change, even McCain is running on that.

But can we believe in McCain's Change? I don't like the Change at all. It should still be "Change we can believe in" IMO.

[laststeamtrain]

2. "Don't let Sarah Palin steal your change." n/t

[targetpractice]

3. I was hoping for "Change for the better"

Whereas, McCain/Palin is "Change for the worse"

[ColbertWatcher]

4. I agree with posted #1 Change worth fighting for.

But, to answer your question, maybe because "believe" is too wishy-washy a verb. And maybe because "need" has the same feel as "necessity" like clean air and clean water, etc.

[TygrBright]

6. I think "Change we're f***ing DESPERATE for..." says it more accurately. n/t

[MzNov]

7. Drop "change" already. Let's do new framing with "healing",

"recovery" "road to getting America back"

"repair" "rebound" yada yada

change is definite, just too broad