Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Assuming you haven't lost your shirt or don't have a lot of wealth,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:48 AM
Original message
Assuming you haven't lost your shirt or don't have a lot of wealth,
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 11:52 AM by burythehatchet
does it not seem like this financial crisis is the "death" that must precede "rebirth"?

It seems like the echoes of 1932 are so clear - failed banking system, the call for regulation, and a generational leader, Democratic president coming into office.

Just as FDR changed the direction of America in 1933, Obama may have a silver lining in terms of having the flexibility to rewrite the compact between us and our government.

Universal (and I pray single payer) healthcare, consumer protection agencies that would have the power to represent the people, regulatory agencies headed by policy professionals instead of lobbyists. There could be a real possibility that the destruction that is occurring today may give birth to a better governance structure.

One can hope. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. First of all, Obama is running a weak, toothless, losing campaign
And if he did manage to win, Obama would need to pull an FDR and govern a lot more liberally than he has campaigned to be that kind of transformative leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Second of all
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah, right.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 11:53 AM by tabatha
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Well gee Wally, if you look at FDR's campaign, he was running a fairly conservative one also
It wasn't until after he got in that he swung hard to the left, when earned him the epithet of being a traitor to his class.

Let's get Obama in and see what he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Right, that's exactly what I said.
Who know Al Gore was secretly such a liberal, based on his 2000 campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. TROLL! BACK UNDER YOUR BRIDGE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Shadow! Back under my feet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. his proposal for rebuilding infrastructure is the fdr model
so, yes, one can hope.

with graham never having left mccain's campaign - the debate ought to be a barn burner at least in spirit if not in volume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the other side sees the same opportunity..
Shock Doctrine in operation right now.

And we haven't "elected" Obama yet... even if he gets the majority of the votes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. I would suggest one other:
An IRS, based upon a much fairer tax code, that is no longer the draconian, bloodthirsty monster in the closet. Through its actions and methods, it erodes so much trust in our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is my wish right now
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. Remember in 1930 there was 60% unemployment
We are sitting at 6% now. The pain won't really be felt until that rises considerably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Actually, I believe the true unemp rate is closer to 12%
the official number is not reflective of the true picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. There were areas where unemployment was that high, but overall
unemployment was no more than 25% in the US (in parts of Europe it was higher).

http://www.shambhala.org/business/goldocean/causdep.html

Additionally, since they've re-jiggered the way it is calculated, by 1930's figuring we'd be at better than 12% today, with some regional unemployment reaching close to 50%.

The powers that be like to exaggerate the Great Depression while minimizing current conditions to 'prove' that things are not as bad as they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. The death, was of living memory. The reason why regulations were maintained
for about 45-50 years after the Crash of 29. The stories of the great-grandparents who suffered the loses of the crash and the children they raised through the 1930's are gone, and their influence faded before them.

Now, new generations are learning the same lessons in a different venue in time.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC