Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pakistan Orders Troops To Fire On US Soldiers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:52 AM
Original message
Pakistan Orders Troops To Fire On US Soldiers
http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1904

Pakistan Orders Troops To Fire On US Soldiers
by: Chris LeJeune
Wed Sep 17, 2008 at 10:01:44 AM EDT


So, just to review, Pakistan is harboring Al-Qaeda terrorists, has WMD (including nuclear), and has a horrible human rights record. Now, they are even showing open hostility against US forces.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) Pakistan's military has ordered its forces to open fire if U.S. troops launch another air or ground raid across the Afghan border, an army spokesman said Tuesday.

The orders, which come in response to a highly unusual Sept. 3 ground attack by U.S. commandos, are certain to heighten tensions between Washington and a key ally against terrorism. Although the ground attack was rare, there have been repeated reports of U.S. drone aircraft striking militant targets, most recently on Sept. 12.

Pakistani officials warn that stepped-up cross-border raids will accomplish little while fueling violent religious extremism in nuclear-armed Pakistan. Some complain that the country is a scapegoat for the failure to stabilize Afghanistan.


How is it that Pakistan is considered our "ally"? And why is it that we need to attack Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Correct me if I'm wrong,
but my recollection is that Pakistan is a sovereign country with a right to defend it's own territory.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No. Kidding. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think the point is Pakistan was the dim one's 'ally' . We gave them
tons of money and support while Musharraf was in office. And for what? I agree, they should protect and defend themselves. Someone needs to redraw the war zones or we're going to be fighting two other countries and will see countless more dead Americans. And for what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nixon excuse for invading Cambodia
"Tonight, American and South Vietnamese units will attack the headquarters for the entire Communist military operation in South Vietnam. This key control center has been occupied by the North Vietnamese and Vietcong for 5 years in blatant violation of Cambodia's neutrality.

This is not an invasion of Cambodia. The areas in which these attacks will be launched are completely occupied and controlled by North Vietnamese forces. Our purpose is not to occupy the areas. Once enemy forces are driven out of these sanctuaries and once their military supplies are destroyed, we will withdraw....


... We take this action not for the purpose of expanding the war into Cambodia but for the purpose of ending the war in Vietnam and winning the just peace we all desire."

- President Nixon's Speech on Cambodia, April 30, 1970.

http://vietnam.vassar.edu/doc15.html


Do you see the parallels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, I do, and have for the past 5 years. Whatever happened to
learning from history instead of repeating it, and the mistakes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Question.
If the Pakistan army were conducting raids into U.S. territory and killing American civilians, should U.S. troops be allowed to respond with force?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sure they are toying with te idea of turning Pakistan into a permanent enemy.
I mean, come on. Navy SEALS going into a remote area and gunning down a bunch of sheepherders? It serves no purpose but to be provocative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC