Question and rant about subpoenas.

[ananda]

I am so pissed!

Will somebody please explain to me why a subpoena
doesn't carry with it the force of law?

I just don't get it!

[firedupdem]

1. I'm waiting too. I don't understand how you refuse to answer to

a subpoena.

[Blue_In_AK]

2. Ed O'Callaghan, former terrorism laywer,

McCain's goon sent here to quash this investigation, says it's because too much politics was injected into the matter. I guess he should know since he's the one who did the injecting. I'm just sick about this.

[Misskittycat]

3. It does carry the force of law, but you need to have someone willing to exert that force.

[bobthedrummer]

4. Just put them there subpoenas on ignore...

[shellgame26]

5. just imagine

if everyone did it.

[lligrd]

6. Rule Of Law, Rule Of Law, Rule Of Law

Whatever happened to that Repug chant?

[sinkingfeeling]

7. Amazing isn't it? Todd Palin can't be bothered because he's too 'busy'. But Bill Clinton, when

President of the United States, was forced by the Repubs to answer to a subpoena.

[Shine]

8. I feel ya on that one. It's absolutely insane.

How can they so blatantly disrespect the rule of law and fucking get away with it?? !

:grr: