Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mandating Fire Sprinklers for the Home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 12:07 AM
Original message
Mandating Fire Sprinklers for the Home
Mandating Fire Sprinklers for the Home

By ANJALI ATHAVALEY

WSJ 9/18/08

Alberta Davidson woke up at 5 a.m. one morning last March to a blaring alarm. Her garage was on fire. But it wasn't her smoke detector that had gone off. Rather, the alarm was notifying her that the fire sprinklers in her garage had activated. The sprinklers helped keep the fire from spreading to the interior of her house in Fallbrook, Calif., where sprinklers are mandatory in new homes. "Fire sprinklers really saved my home and saved my life," says Ms. Davidson, 48. "Prior to the incident, we took them for granted." As concern over residential fire deaths grows, home sprinklers are becoming more widespread and could soon be mandatory in new homes across the country. As early as this weekend, the International Code Council, which sets the residential building code used in 46 states either at the state or local level, will vote on code changes that would make sprinklers mandatory in new one-family and two-family homes. Meanwhile, a growing number of communities in states ranging from California to Maryland are already requiring sprinklers in new homes and, in some cases, in homes that undergo significant enlargements.

(snip)

Supporters of mandatory sprinklers say they help extend the amount of time residents have to get out of the house during a fire by preventing flashover, which occurs when the temperature in a room reaches a point where all combustible materials burst into flames. In many cases, they put out smaller house fires altogether, says Gary Keith, vice president of field operations at the Quincy, Mass.-based National Fire Protection Association, a nonprofit that sets recommended fire-safety standards. That has spurred cities like University Park, Texas, where homes are generally two stories and built in close proximity to each other, to take action. The City Council there passed an ordinance last January, requiring sprinklers in new homes and homes that are 3,000 square feet that undergo an addition of 1,000 square feet or more. Mayor James H. Holmes III says that in University Park, sprinkler installation costs $10,000 to $15,000 for most homes. Many communities are also making sprinklers mandatory because of budget reasons, says Lawrence McKenna, fire program specialist at the Washington-based U.S. Fire Administration. Fewer people are volunteering to be firefighters these days. Many cities and counties are finding that, by requiring sprinklers, they can avoid expanding their fire departments or building costly new fire stations.

But the idea of requiring sprinklers in single-family homes nationwide has drawn heated opposition from builders, who say that sprinklers increase costs and require some maintenance by the homeowner. "While NAHB is not against residential sprinklers as an option for home owners, there is not enough evidence in making these mandatory," says Steve Orlowski, program manager at the National Association of Home Builders in Washington. Supporters of sprinkler ordinances point to a study by Scottsdale, Ariz., which made sprinklers mandatory in 1985. Fifteen years later, the average fire loss per single-family home with sprinklers was only $2,166, compared with an average loss of $45,019 in single-family homes without them. In single-family homes, one or two sprinkler heads controlled or extinguished fires 88% of the time.


(snip)

Residents who have been through house fires say, though, that they were shocked by the amount of water that filled their homes when their sprinkler systems activated. (A typical sprinkler emits 15 to 20 gallons of water per minute.) "It was like a hurricane," says James Bond, 36, a project manager at a remodeling company who had a house fire last New Year's Eve. A candle that was lit for an earlier party melted and caught the back of his couch on fire. The sprinkler helped to contain the fire so that Mr. Bond's guests could lift the couch and throw it outside. The house had $25,000 worth of water damage, but "I'd rather have that type of damage than have the house catch on fire," says Mr. Bond, of Clarksburg, Md.

Another concern for homeowners and builders is the cost of installing a sprinkler, which can vary depending on the community. According to a study of 10 communities in the U.S. and Canada released last week by the Fire Protection Research Foundation in Quincy, Mass., the average cost of sprinkler systems is $1.61 per square foot of space to be covered by the system. Beyond the initial cost, fire-safety officials and sprinkler manufacturers say maintenance is simple. In most cases, homeowners should turn on the water-flow test valve on the sprinkler system and make sure it is working once a year, says NFPA's Mr. Keith. Typically, there is a discharge point at the end of the system where the water should flow outside. They should also visually check the sprinkler heads to make sure nothing is obstructing them. Sprinklers are designed to last decades, but NFPA recommends having your sprinklers inspected by a contractor after 20 years... There is a financial benefit to sprinklers, too: Homeowners who have them can in most cases get a discount on homeowners insurance. According to the Fire Protection Research Foundation's study, insurers give an average premium discount of 7%.

(snip)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122170150213450731.html?mod=todays_us_personal_journal (subscription)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is an interesting question...
But for me, and ultimately for my husband, it was a no-brainer.

I saw "This Old House" do a segment on this very topic; they showed what happens when fire sprinklers do their thing.

I recorded the segment, and my husband watched it. Afterwards, he agreed with me.

We were in the process of building a new house, and we did have the sprinklers installed at the time.

When the fire captain came to inspect them, he told me he wished more new homes had them. Our city only mandates them in the garage, for new single family homes.

I heard about a new home that only had them in the garage. The family was away when the house caught fire. The place burned to the ground~~except for the garage. Fortunately, the valuable papers were in there.

We've had no maintenance to do on them.

It's a kind of insurance for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They are required in all homes in Scottsdale. They work well.
In Scottsdale, Arizona, a sprinkler ordinance was implemented on January 1, 1986. Ten years after the ordinance was passed, the Rural/Metro Fire Department published the Scottsdale Report. The study has now been updated to include 5 additional years of data.

41,408 homes, more than 50 percent of the homes in Scottsdale, are protected with fire sprinkler systems.

Lives Saved
in the 15 years there were 598 home fires. Of the 598 homefires, 49 were in single-family homes with fire sprinkler systems:
• There were no deaths in sprinklered homes.
• 13 people died in homes without sprinklers.
• The lives of 13 people who would have likely died without sprinklers, were saved

There was less damage in the homes with sprinklers*:
• Average fire loss per sprinklered incident: $2,166.
• Average fire loss per unsprinklered incident: $45,019.
• Annual fire losses in Scottsdale (2000-2001) were $3,021,225 compared to the national average of $9,144,442.

You are very smart getting them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks!
I thought it was a smart move!

The peace of mind is incomparable!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Any Figures for Water Damage from Malfunctioning Sprinklers?
I saw one of those go off all by itself (there was no fire) and spray water all over an office once.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if the odds of a house fire
are higher in some part of the country. My house is designed so that there is an easy exit from every room. Are there problems with leaks with these systems? An interesting idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ours is a two story house...
So it's hard to get down from upstairs...

We built our house 6 years ago, and we've never had any leaks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Everywhere I have lived in Phoenix/Scottsdale has had sprinklers, never had a drop.
Twenty years, not one incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I would think that California would top the list
with so many fires that destroy homes, when firefighters have to use the pools to hose the houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. I work in a Biopharm pilot plant
We actually mop the ceilings in process areas so the sprinkler heads get banged a bit in the process. None of them has ever leaked or discharged from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. No response from the libertarian left, or supporters of affordable housing?
This is a terrible idea for anyone who understands the cost of construction, as I do (having worked in the construction trade).

Of course it's just peachy for DUers who can afford new construction in a home. The top 10%.

Industry statistics come in handy sometimes.

(The US affordable housing plan, per industry AND blue dog "liberal" municipal plans, is to let homes depreciate -- create new slums -- from the initial market value that Dems and Republicans are so desperately trying to prop up by further inflating construction costs and depleting the global supply of iron and copper with over-engineered intensive regulation of private individuals. The initial market value of 80% of all new construction is only affordable by the top 10%. That includes over-affluent "blue" urbanites who are over-represented on the internet and, to cross-reference another thread, in the funny pages.)

The gov't will do nothing but continue to screw over the poor and benefit the rich in this country. Not just rich conservatives, but rich liberals as well. Let's mandate plastic jungle gyms and ban smoking in private homes while we're at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I understand the cost of construction too...and I'm all for this
Did you EVER see a building code regulation that didn't grandfather in all the weird shit people did before the reg was passed? This is all about new construction...where it costs about $1500 to sprinkler a 2000-sf home. (The $15,000 number I keep seeing is for retrofit installation...where cutting up the house to install CPVC all over the place does get expensive. Adding $1500 someplace that might actually HELP the home means installing an $1100 refrigerator instead of a $2600 refrigerator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Do they use CPVC for the water supply?
Wouldn't copper be better for something that is meant to fight fire?

What about using PEX?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. They use CPVC, and with good reason (not because it's cheaper)
CPVC is more fire-resistant than PEX is, and it's about as good as copper.

Besides, if it DOES catch fire, it's full of pressurized water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. I wish my apartment had them a month ago
When it burned to the ground, destroying everything I owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. How terrible it must have been for you
I thought that apartments are the first to be required to have sprinklers...

Perhaps only for new ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I don't know
I had lived in the same apartment for eight years and never even heard talk of them installing them. I'm still looking for a new place to live and have not seen any apartments that have them. I'm in Ohio and as far as I know, there is nothing that requires them here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC