Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

this bailout should be funded with a one-time wealth tax...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 12:34 PM
Original message
this bailout should be funded with a one-time wealth tax...
http://www.forbes.com/2008/09/16/forbes-400-billionaires-lists-400list08_cx_mn_0917richamericans_land.html

The rich haven't gotten richer--or poorer--this year. For the second year in a row, the price of admission to The Forbes 400 is $1.3 billion. In this, the 27th edition of the list, the assembled net worth of America's wealthiest rose by $30 billion--only 2%--to $1.57 trillion. More ...

so- just the top 400 alone all have net worth's of over 1.3 billion, with a cumulative total of $1.57 trillion.
THESE are the class of people who have most benefited from the wall street over the years, and as such should foot a substantial portion of any bailout.

how about a one-time wealth tax of- a. 50% of all wealth over $500million. -OR- b. 25% of all wealth over $100million...depending on which one would raise the most money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whichever candidate proposes this better have good bodyguards
And a steel helmet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Pretty much. This this the group of people who control America behind the scenes. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think that is so outlandish.
I would like to see us get it behind us in a very short period. Maybe spread that out over a few years so the hit doesn't hurt so much. I agree, most of the people at that level have gained from these market shenanigans. Also people in 401k, or pension plans. But it really is the ones at the very high levels who benefitted the most and should give back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's a good idea
Let's have that one time be April 15th every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. income taxes are for annual income- this would be a one-time tax on all accumulated wealth...
not on the previous year's income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I got that
I was just making a small joke about a big problem. We need to restore normal taxation to the wealthy before China calls in all the IOU's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would be happy with a reasonable approach to capital gains.
How can you ask for bailouts for capital losses and still be against capital gains taxes? It makes no sense to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. they'll decry the retiree's who are living on investment income...
to solve that issue- i would propose doubling the capital gains tax on investment income over $75k per person per year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backwoodsbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. won't work
say 25% over whatever number you want to throw out there.Net worth doesn't equal hard cash.How many people worth 1 billion have 250 million in hard cash to hand over?

This would just make a bad situation worse as people have to dump stock to try to come up with the money we want to try to ...you know...stop stock from tumbling :)

This would send us into a depression
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC